Cargando…
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082571 |
_version_ | 1783577669058691072 |
---|---|
author | Caiati, Carlo Luzzi, Giovanni Pollice, Paolo Favale, Stefano Lepera, Mario Erminio |
author_facet | Caiati, Carlo Luzzi, Giovanni Pollice, Paolo Favale, Stefano Lepera, Mario Erminio |
author_sort | Caiati, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (p = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7465795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74657952020-09-04 A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography Caiati, Carlo Luzzi, Giovanni Pollice, Paolo Favale, Stefano Lepera, Mario Erminio J Clin Med Article Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (p = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC. MDPI 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7465795/ /pubmed/32784437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082571 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Caiati, Carlo Luzzi, Giovanni Pollice, Paolo Favale, Stefano Lepera, Mario Erminio A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title | A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_full | A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_fullStr | A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_short | A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography |
title_sort | novel clinical perspective on new masses after lead extraction (ghosts) by means of intracardiac echocardiography |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082571 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caiaticarlo anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT luzzigiovanni anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT pollicepaolo anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT favalestefano anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT leperamarioerminio anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT caiaticarlo novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT luzzigiovanni novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT pollicepaolo novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT favalestefano novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography AT leperamarioerminio novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography |