Cargando…

A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography

Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caiati, Carlo, Luzzi, Giovanni, Pollice, Paolo, Favale, Stefano, Lepera, Mario Erminio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082571
_version_ 1783577669058691072
author Caiati, Carlo
Luzzi, Giovanni
Pollice, Paolo
Favale, Stefano
Lepera, Mario Erminio
author_facet Caiati, Carlo
Luzzi, Giovanni
Pollice, Paolo
Favale, Stefano
Lepera, Mario Erminio
author_sort Caiati, Carlo
collection PubMed
description Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (p = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7465795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74657952020-09-04 A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography Caiati, Carlo Luzzi, Giovanni Pollice, Paolo Favale, Stefano Lepera, Mario Erminio J Clin Med Article Background: A lead-reactive fibrous capsule (FC) identified by ultrasounds as an atrial or ventricular lead thickness of more than 1 mm above the vendor-declared lead diameter (TL) and its local fibrotic attachment to the cardiac wall (FAC) have never been investigated in vivo, so their relationship with post-extraction masses (ghost) is not known. Methods: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) was performed twice during the same extraction procedure in 40 consecutive patients: before and immediately after infected lead extraction Results: The ghost detection rate was high: 60% (24/40 patients); ICE could identify both TL and FAC, TL being noted in 25/40 (62%) patients and FAC in 12/40 patients (30%). Both TL and FAC were significantly associated with ghosts (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), but TL had a higher prediction power. The specificity was similar: 94% (15/16) and 100% (16/16), respectively, but TL showed a much higher sensitivity: 100%, (24/24) vs 50% (12/24) (p = 0.016). The ghost group did not show a higher event rate in the follow-up (mean follow-up time = 20 ± 17 months). Conclusion: ICE is able to evaluate both TL and FAC in vivo; ghosts are mostly benign remnants of fibrotic lead capsule cut off during extraction and retained inside the heart by FAC. MDPI 2020-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7465795/ /pubmed/32784437 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082571 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Caiati, Carlo
Luzzi, Giovanni
Pollice, Paolo
Favale, Stefano
Lepera, Mario Erminio
A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_full A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_fullStr A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_short A Novel Clinical Perspective on New Masses after Lead Extraction (Ghosts) by Means of Intracardiac Echocardiography
title_sort novel clinical perspective on new masses after lead extraction (ghosts) by means of intracardiac echocardiography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082571
work_keys_str_mv AT caiaticarlo anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT luzzigiovanni anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT pollicepaolo anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT favalestefano anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT leperamarioerminio anovelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT caiaticarlo novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT luzzigiovanni novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT pollicepaolo novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT favalestefano novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography
AT leperamarioerminio novelclinicalperspectiveonnewmassesafterleadextractionghostsbymeansofintracardiacechocardiography