Cargando…

Evaluation of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group’s systematic review priority-setting project

BACKGROUND: Health researchers and funders are increasingly consulting with stakeholders to set their research agendas but these activities are rarely evaluated. The Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group (CCCG) conducted a priority-setting project for systematic reviews in partnership with stak...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Synnot, Anneliese, Tong, Allison, Ryan, Rebecca, Hill, Sophie
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2020
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7465879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00604-x

Ejemplares similares

Selecting, refining and identifying priority Cochrane Reviews in health communication and participation in partnership with consumers and other stakeholders
por: Synnot, Anneliese J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Research priorities in health communication and participation: international survey of consumers and other stakeholders
por: Synnot, Anneliese, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE)
por: Tong, Allison, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping review
por: Synnot, Anneliese, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Rapid priority setting exercise on faecal incontinence for Cochrane Incontinence
por: Thomson, Katie H, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Identifying priority review questions for Cochrane Eyes and Vision: protocol for a priority setting exercise
por: Evans, Jennifer R, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Supporting implementation of Cochrane methods in complex communication reviews: resources developed and lessons learned for editorial practice and policy
por: Ryan, Rebecca, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Setting priorities for knowledge translation of Cochrane reviews for health equity: Evidence for Equity
por: Tugwell, Peter, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Development and assessment of a website presenting evidence-based information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project
por: Colombo, Cinzia, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects
por: Pollock, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

A systematic scoping review of the evidence for consumer involvement in organisations undertaking systematic reviews: focus on Cochrane
por: Morley, Richard F, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Meta-analysis and The Cochrane Collaboration: 20 years of the Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
por: McKenzie, Joanne E, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Presenting evidence-based health information for people with multiple sclerosis: the IN-DEEP project protocol
por: Hill, Sophie, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Perceived barriers and facilitators to participation in physical activity for children with disability: a qualitative study
por: Shields, Nora, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Web Search Behavior and Information Needs of People With Multiple Sclerosis: Focus Group Study and Analysis of Online Postings
por: Colombo, Cinzia, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
por: Pollock, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Self-care for anxiety and depression: a comparison of evidence from Cochrane reviews and practice to inform decision-making and priority-setting
por: Pilkington, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews
por: Al Faleh, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
por: Millard, Tanya, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research
por: Bunn, Frances, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Research priority setting related to older adults: a scoping review to inform the Cochrane-Campbell Global Ageing Partnership work programme
por: Barbeau, Victoria I, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Identifying key priorities for research to protect the consumer with food hypersensitivity: A UK Food Standards Agency Priority Setting Exercise
por: Turner, Paul J., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Eye and Vision Group Reviews
por: Mimouni, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Building blocks for meta-synthesis: data integration tables for summarising, mapping, and synthesising evidence on interventions for communicating with health consumers
por: Ryan, Rebecca E, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

COCHRANE CONTRIBUTES TO COLLABORATIVE COVID-19 LIVING EVIDENCE PROJECT
Publicado: (2020)

Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication
por: Kaufman, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Mortality Outcomes in Dermatology: An Exploration of Core Outcome Sets and Cochrane Skin Systematic Reviews
por: Sivesind, Torunn E, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration
por: Turner, Lucy, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews? – a survey of the Co-ordinating Editors of Cochrane review groups
por: Kirkham, Jamie J, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project
por: Lindson, Nicola, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Transitional care for patients with acute stroke—A priority‐setting project
por: Solbakken, Liss Marita, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
por: Siebert, Maximilian, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Most Cochrane systematic reviews and protocols did not adhere to the Cochrane's risk of bias 2.0 tool
por: Martimbianco, Ana Luiza Cabrera, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Alexander Cochran
Publicado: (1924)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Legenstein, Karin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Cochrane Pflegeforum
por: Djukic, Dejan, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Maintaining relevance in HIV systematic reviews: an evaluation of Cochrane reviews
por: Eshun-Wilson, Ingrid, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
por: Lundh, Andreas, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Cochrane Eyes and Vision: systematic reviews on myopia
por: Evans, Jennifer
Publicado: (2019)

The quality of Cochrane systematic reviews of acupuncture: an overview
por: Ji, Zhaochen, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_7v6gl9jhsmqo04coufrkhck3oh