Cargando…
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
Background: Despite offering an attractive option, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. Methods: Recognizing the paucity of data in the Asian population, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 24 patients (median age...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082354 |
_version_ | 1783577712390045696 |
---|---|
author | Park, Hyunkyung Byun, Ja Min Yoon, Sung-Soo Koh, Youngil Shin, Dong-Yeop Hong, Junshik Kim, Inho |
author_facet | Park, Hyunkyung Byun, Ja Min Yoon, Sung-Soo Koh, Youngil Shin, Dong-Yeop Hong, Junshik Kim, Inho |
author_sort | Park, Hyunkyung |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Despite offering an attractive option, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. Methods: Recognizing the paucity of data in the Asian population, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 24 patients (median age 52) undergoing alloSCT between April 2003 and November 2017. Results: The median time from diagnosis to alloSCT was 39.4 months. The majority of the patients (70.8%) underwent alloSCT followed by reduced intensity conditioning regimens after a median of five lines of therapy. Among 24 patients, 15 patients (62.5%) had a high-risk MM feature. The two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the total patients were 29.2 ± 9.3% and 44.3 ± 10.3%, respectively. Patients who were treated with less chemotherapy lines (<5) before alloSCT had a prolonged RFS and OS. All patients (seven patients) who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen had high-risk features, but two out of seven patients showed long-term survival without lasting sequelae. Nine patients (37.5%) experienced non-relapse mortality (NRM) within one year after alloSCT (the one-year cumulative incidence of NRM was 38.3 ± 10.1%). Conclusion: AlloSCT can still be implemented as effective salvage option in the treatment of relapsed/refractory high-risk MM. The optimal timing of alloSCT remains to be determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7466005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74660052020-09-14 Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? Park, Hyunkyung Byun, Ja Min Yoon, Sung-Soo Koh, Youngil Shin, Dong-Yeop Hong, Junshik Kim, Inho J Clin Med Article Background: Despite offering an attractive option, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. Methods: Recognizing the paucity of data in the Asian population, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 24 patients (median age 52) undergoing alloSCT between April 2003 and November 2017. Results: The median time from diagnosis to alloSCT was 39.4 months. The majority of the patients (70.8%) underwent alloSCT followed by reduced intensity conditioning regimens after a median of five lines of therapy. Among 24 patients, 15 patients (62.5%) had a high-risk MM feature. The two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the total patients were 29.2 ± 9.3% and 44.3 ± 10.3%, respectively. Patients who were treated with less chemotherapy lines (<5) before alloSCT had a prolonged RFS and OS. All patients (seven patients) who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen had high-risk features, but two out of seven patients showed long-term survival without lasting sequelae. Nine patients (37.5%) experienced non-relapse mortality (NRM) within one year after alloSCT (the one-year cumulative incidence of NRM was 38.3 ± 10.1%). Conclusion: AlloSCT can still be implemented as effective salvage option in the treatment of relapsed/refractory high-risk MM. The optimal timing of alloSCT remains to be determined. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7466005/ /pubmed/32717932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082354 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Hyunkyung Byun, Ja Min Yoon, Sung-Soo Koh, Youngil Shin, Dong-Yeop Hong, Junshik Kim, Inho Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? |
title | Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? |
title_full | Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? |
title_fullStr | Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? |
title_full_unstemmed | Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? |
title_short | Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? |
title_sort | allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treatment: is it still relevant? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082354 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkhyunkyung allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant AT byunjamin allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant AT yoonsungsoo allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant AT kohyoungil allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant AT shindongyeop allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant AT hongjunshik allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant AT kiminho allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant |