Cargando…

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?

Background: Despite offering an attractive option, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. Methods: Recognizing the paucity of data in the Asian population, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 24 patients (median age...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Hyunkyung, Byun, Ja Min, Yoon, Sung-Soo, Koh, Youngil, Shin, Dong-Yeop, Hong, Junshik, Kim, Inho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082354
_version_ 1783577712390045696
author Park, Hyunkyung
Byun, Ja Min
Yoon, Sung-Soo
Koh, Youngil
Shin, Dong-Yeop
Hong, Junshik
Kim, Inho
author_facet Park, Hyunkyung
Byun, Ja Min
Yoon, Sung-Soo
Koh, Youngil
Shin, Dong-Yeop
Hong, Junshik
Kim, Inho
author_sort Park, Hyunkyung
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite offering an attractive option, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. Methods: Recognizing the paucity of data in the Asian population, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 24 patients (median age 52) undergoing alloSCT between April 2003 and November 2017. Results: The median time from diagnosis to alloSCT was 39.4 months. The majority of the patients (70.8%) underwent alloSCT followed by reduced intensity conditioning regimens after a median of five lines of therapy. Among 24 patients, 15 patients (62.5%) had a high-risk MM feature. The two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the total patients were 29.2 ± 9.3% and 44.3 ± 10.3%, respectively. Patients who were treated with less chemotherapy lines (<5) before alloSCT had a prolonged RFS and OS. All patients (seven patients) who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen had high-risk features, but two out of seven patients showed long-term survival without lasting sequelae. Nine patients (37.5%) experienced non-relapse mortality (NRM) within one year after alloSCT (the one-year cumulative incidence of NRM was 38.3 ± 10.1%). Conclusion: AlloSCT can still be implemented as effective salvage option in the treatment of relapsed/refractory high-risk MM. The optimal timing of alloSCT remains to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7466005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74660052020-09-14 Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant? Park, Hyunkyung Byun, Ja Min Yoon, Sung-Soo Koh, Youngil Shin, Dong-Yeop Hong, Junshik Kim, Inho J Clin Med Article Background: Despite offering an attractive option, the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) remains unclear. Methods: Recognizing the paucity of data in the Asian population, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of 24 patients (median age 52) undergoing alloSCT between April 2003 and November 2017. Results: The median time from diagnosis to alloSCT was 39.4 months. The majority of the patients (70.8%) underwent alloSCT followed by reduced intensity conditioning regimens after a median of five lines of therapy. Among 24 patients, 15 patients (62.5%) had a high-risk MM feature. The two-year relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of the total patients were 29.2 ± 9.3% and 44.3 ± 10.3%, respectively. Patients who were treated with less chemotherapy lines (<5) before alloSCT had a prolonged RFS and OS. All patients (seven patients) who received a myeloablative conditioning regimen had high-risk features, but two out of seven patients showed long-term survival without lasting sequelae. Nine patients (37.5%) experienced non-relapse mortality (NRM) within one year after alloSCT (the one-year cumulative incidence of NRM was 38.3 ± 10.1%). Conclusion: AlloSCT can still be implemented as effective salvage option in the treatment of relapsed/refractory high-risk MM. The optimal timing of alloSCT remains to be determined. MDPI 2020-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7466005/ /pubmed/32717932 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082354 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Park, Hyunkyung
Byun, Ja Min
Yoon, Sung-Soo
Koh, Youngil
Shin, Dong-Yeop
Hong, Junshik
Kim, Inho
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
title Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
title_full Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
title_fullStr Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
title_full_unstemmed Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
title_short Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treatment: Is It Still Relevant?
title_sort allogeneic stem cell transplantation in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treatment: is it still relevant?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32717932
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082354
work_keys_str_mv AT parkhyunkyung allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant
AT byunjamin allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant
AT yoonsungsoo allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant
AT kohyoungil allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant
AT shindongyeop allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant
AT hongjunshik allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant
AT kiminho allogeneicstemcelltransplantationinrelapsedrefractorymultiplemyelomatreatmentisitstillrelevant