Cargando…

In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems

Solid polymer electrolytes for bipolar lithium ion batteries requiring electrochemical stability of 4.5 V vs. Li/Li(+) are presented. Thus, imidazolium-containing poly(ionic liquid) (PIL) networks were prepared by crosslinking UV-photopolymerization in an in situ approach (i.e., to allow preparation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Röchow, Eike T., Coeler, Matthias, Pospiech, Doris, Kobsch, Oliver, Mechtaeva, Elizaveta, Vogel, Roland, Voit, Brigitte, Nikolowski, Kristian, Wolter, Mareike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12081707
_version_ 1783577718633267200
author Röchow, Eike T.
Coeler, Matthias
Pospiech, Doris
Kobsch, Oliver
Mechtaeva, Elizaveta
Vogel, Roland
Voit, Brigitte
Nikolowski, Kristian
Wolter, Mareike
author_facet Röchow, Eike T.
Coeler, Matthias
Pospiech, Doris
Kobsch, Oliver
Mechtaeva, Elizaveta
Vogel, Roland
Voit, Brigitte
Nikolowski, Kristian
Wolter, Mareike
author_sort Röchow, Eike T.
collection PubMed
description Solid polymer electrolytes for bipolar lithium ion batteries requiring electrochemical stability of 4.5 V vs. Li/Li(+) are presented. Thus, imidazolium-containing poly(ionic liquid) (PIL) networks were prepared by crosslinking UV-photopolymerization in an in situ approach (i.e., to allow preparation directly on the electrodes used). The crosslinks in the network improve the mechanical stability of the samples, as indicated by the free-standing nature of the materials and temperature-dependent rheology measurements. The averaged mesh size calculated from rheologoical measurements varied between 1.66 nm with 10 mol% crosslinker and 4.35 nm without crosslinker. The chemical structure of the ionic liquid (IL) monomers in the network was varied to achieve the highest possible ionic conductivity. The systematic variation in three series with a number of new IL monomers offers a direct comparison of samples obtained under comparable conditions. The ionic conductivity of generation II and III PIL networks was improved by three orders of magnitude, to the range of 7.1 × 10(−6) S·cm(−1) at 20 °C and 2.3 × 10(−4) S·cm(−1) at 80 °C, compared to known poly(vinylimidazolium·TFSI) materials (generation I). The transition from linear homopolymers to networks reduces the ionic conductivity by about one order of magnitude, but allows free-standing films instead of sticky materials. The PIL networks have a much higher voltage stability than PEO with the same amount and type of conducting salt, lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI). GII-PIL networks are electrochemically stable up to a potential of 4.7 V vs. Li/Li(+), which is crucial for a potential application as a solid electrolyte. Cycling (cyclovoltammetry and lithium plating-stripping) experiments revealed that it is possible to conduct lithium ions through the GII-polymer networks at low currents. We concluded that the synthesized PIL networks represent suitable candidates for solid-state electrolytes in lithium ion batteries or solid-state batteries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7466031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74660312020-09-14 In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems Röchow, Eike T. Coeler, Matthias Pospiech, Doris Kobsch, Oliver Mechtaeva, Elizaveta Vogel, Roland Voit, Brigitte Nikolowski, Kristian Wolter, Mareike Polymers (Basel) Article Solid polymer electrolytes for bipolar lithium ion batteries requiring electrochemical stability of 4.5 V vs. Li/Li(+) are presented. Thus, imidazolium-containing poly(ionic liquid) (PIL) networks were prepared by crosslinking UV-photopolymerization in an in situ approach (i.e., to allow preparation directly on the electrodes used). The crosslinks in the network improve the mechanical stability of the samples, as indicated by the free-standing nature of the materials and temperature-dependent rheology measurements. The averaged mesh size calculated from rheologoical measurements varied between 1.66 nm with 10 mol% crosslinker and 4.35 nm without crosslinker. The chemical structure of the ionic liquid (IL) monomers in the network was varied to achieve the highest possible ionic conductivity. The systematic variation in three series with a number of new IL monomers offers a direct comparison of samples obtained under comparable conditions. The ionic conductivity of generation II and III PIL networks was improved by three orders of magnitude, to the range of 7.1 × 10(−6) S·cm(−1) at 20 °C and 2.3 × 10(−4) S·cm(−1) at 80 °C, compared to known poly(vinylimidazolium·TFSI) materials (generation I). The transition from linear homopolymers to networks reduces the ionic conductivity by about one order of magnitude, but allows free-standing films instead of sticky materials. The PIL networks have a much higher voltage stability than PEO with the same amount and type of conducting salt, lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl)imide (LiTFSI). GII-PIL networks are electrochemically stable up to a potential of 4.7 V vs. Li/Li(+), which is crucial for a potential application as a solid electrolyte. Cycling (cyclovoltammetry and lithium plating-stripping) experiments revealed that it is possible to conduct lithium ions through the GII-polymer networks at low currents. We concluded that the synthesized PIL networks represent suitable candidates for solid-state electrolytes in lithium ion batteries or solid-state batteries. MDPI 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7466031/ /pubmed/32751500 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12081707 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Röchow, Eike T.
Coeler, Matthias
Pospiech, Doris
Kobsch, Oliver
Mechtaeva, Elizaveta
Vogel, Roland
Voit, Brigitte
Nikolowski, Kristian
Wolter, Mareike
In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems
title In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems
title_full In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems
title_fullStr In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems
title_full_unstemmed In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems
title_short In Situ Preparation of Crosslinked Polymer Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries: A Comparison of Monomer Systems
title_sort in situ preparation of crosslinked polymer electrolytes for lithium ion batteries: a comparison of monomer systems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751500
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym12081707
work_keys_str_mv AT rochoweiket insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT coelermatthias insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT pospiechdoris insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT kobscholiver insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT mechtaevaelizaveta insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT vogelroland insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT voitbrigitte insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT nikolowskikristian insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems
AT woltermareike insitupreparationofcrosslinkedpolymerelectrolytesforlithiumionbatteriesacomparisonofmonomersystems