Cargando…
Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
Rebaudioside (Reb) D and M are the recent focus of the food industry to address the bitter taste challenge of Reb A, which is the most commonly used steviol glycoside in natural sweetener stevia. This study evaluated the sensory characteristics of Reb A, D, and M, compared to 14% (w/v) sucrose, usin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9081026 |
_version_ | 1783577753669337088 |
---|---|
author | Tao, Ran Cho, Sungeun |
author_facet | Tao, Ran Cho, Sungeun |
author_sort | Tao, Ran |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rebaudioside (Reb) D and M are the recent focus of the food industry to address the bitter taste challenge of Reb A, which is the most commonly used steviol glycoside in natural sweetener stevia. This study evaluated the sensory characteristics of Reb A, D, and M, compared to 14% (w/v) sucrose, using a consumer panel and explored the relationship between 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status (i.e., non-tasters, medium tasters, supertasters) and the perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes of the three steviol glycosides. A total of 126 participants evaluated the intensities of in-mouth, immediate (5 s after expectorating), and lingering (1 min after expectorating) sweetness and bitterness of 0.1% Reb A, D, M, and 14% sucrose and described the aftertaste of the sweeteners by using a check-all-that-apply (CATA) question. The results showed that in-mouth sweetness and bitterness of Reb D and M were not significantly different from sucrose, unlike Reb A which showed significant bitterness. However, Reb D and M showed more intense lingering sweetness than sucrose. The CATA analysis resulted that Reb D and M were closer to positive attribute terms and also to sucrose than Reb A, but Reb D and M were still considered artificial, which may cause them to be perceived negatively. When comparing among PROP taster groups, no significant differences in the perceived sweetness and bitterness of the three steviol glycosides were found. This study generates important information about Reb A, D, and M for the food industry, especially working with products formulated to deliver reductions in sugar using a natural high-intensity sweetener, stevia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7466183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74661832020-09-14 Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) Tao, Ran Cho, Sungeun Foods Article Rebaudioside (Reb) D and M are the recent focus of the food industry to address the bitter taste challenge of Reb A, which is the most commonly used steviol glycoside in natural sweetener stevia. This study evaluated the sensory characteristics of Reb A, D, and M, compared to 14% (w/v) sucrose, using a consumer panel and explored the relationship between 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status (i.e., non-tasters, medium tasters, supertasters) and the perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes of the three steviol glycosides. A total of 126 participants evaluated the intensities of in-mouth, immediate (5 s after expectorating), and lingering (1 min after expectorating) sweetness and bitterness of 0.1% Reb A, D, M, and 14% sucrose and described the aftertaste of the sweeteners by using a check-all-that-apply (CATA) question. The results showed that in-mouth sweetness and bitterness of Reb D and M were not significantly different from sucrose, unlike Reb A which showed significant bitterness. However, Reb D and M showed more intense lingering sweetness than sucrose. The CATA analysis resulted that Reb D and M were closer to positive attribute terms and also to sucrose than Reb A, but Reb D and M were still considered artificial, which may cause them to be perceived negatively. When comparing among PROP taster groups, no significant differences in the perceived sweetness and bitterness of the three steviol glycosides were found. This study generates important information about Reb A, D, and M for the food industry, especially working with products formulated to deliver reductions in sugar using a natural high-intensity sweetener, stevia. MDPI 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7466183/ /pubmed/32751835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9081026 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Tao, Ran Cho, Sungeun Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) |
title | Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) |
title_full | Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) |
title_fullStr | Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) |
title_full_unstemmed | Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) |
title_short | Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) |
title_sort | consumer-based sensory characterization of steviol glycosides (rebaudioside a, d, and m) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9081026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taoran consumerbasedsensorycharacterizationofsteviolglycosidesrebaudiosideadandm AT chosungeun consumerbasedsensorycharacterizationofsteviolglycosidesrebaudiosideadandm |