Cargando…

Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)

Rebaudioside (Reb) D and M are the recent focus of the food industry to address the bitter taste challenge of Reb A, which is the most commonly used steviol glycoside in natural sweetener stevia. This study evaluated the sensory characteristics of Reb A, D, and M, compared to 14% (w/v) sucrose, usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tao, Ran, Cho, Sungeun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9081026
_version_ 1783577753669337088
author Tao, Ran
Cho, Sungeun
author_facet Tao, Ran
Cho, Sungeun
author_sort Tao, Ran
collection PubMed
description Rebaudioside (Reb) D and M are the recent focus of the food industry to address the bitter taste challenge of Reb A, which is the most commonly used steviol glycoside in natural sweetener stevia. This study evaluated the sensory characteristics of Reb A, D, and M, compared to 14% (w/v) sucrose, using a consumer panel and explored the relationship between 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status (i.e., non-tasters, medium tasters, supertasters) and the perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes of the three steviol glycosides. A total of 126 participants evaluated the intensities of in-mouth, immediate (5 s after expectorating), and lingering (1 min after expectorating) sweetness and bitterness of 0.1% Reb A, D, M, and 14% sucrose and described the aftertaste of the sweeteners by using a check-all-that-apply (CATA) question. The results showed that in-mouth sweetness and bitterness of Reb D and M were not significantly different from sucrose, unlike Reb A which showed significant bitterness. However, Reb D and M showed more intense lingering sweetness than sucrose. The CATA analysis resulted that Reb D and M were closer to positive attribute terms and also to sucrose than Reb A, but Reb D and M were still considered artificial, which may cause them to be perceived negatively. When comparing among PROP taster groups, no significant differences in the perceived sweetness and bitterness of the three steviol glycosides were found. This study generates important information about Reb A, D, and M for the food industry, especially working with products formulated to deliver reductions in sugar using a natural high-intensity sweetener, stevia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7466183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74661832020-09-14 Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M) Tao, Ran Cho, Sungeun Foods Article Rebaudioside (Reb) D and M are the recent focus of the food industry to address the bitter taste challenge of Reb A, which is the most commonly used steviol glycoside in natural sweetener stevia. This study evaluated the sensory characteristics of Reb A, D, and M, compared to 14% (w/v) sucrose, using a consumer panel and explored the relationship between 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status (i.e., non-tasters, medium tasters, supertasters) and the perceived intensity of sweet and bitter tastes of the three steviol glycosides. A total of 126 participants evaluated the intensities of in-mouth, immediate (5 s after expectorating), and lingering (1 min after expectorating) sweetness and bitterness of 0.1% Reb A, D, M, and 14% sucrose and described the aftertaste of the sweeteners by using a check-all-that-apply (CATA) question. The results showed that in-mouth sweetness and bitterness of Reb D and M were not significantly different from sucrose, unlike Reb A which showed significant bitterness. However, Reb D and M showed more intense lingering sweetness than sucrose. The CATA analysis resulted that Reb D and M were closer to positive attribute terms and also to sucrose than Reb A, but Reb D and M were still considered artificial, which may cause them to be perceived negatively. When comparing among PROP taster groups, no significant differences in the perceived sweetness and bitterness of the three steviol glycosides were found. This study generates important information about Reb A, D, and M for the food industry, especially working with products formulated to deliver reductions in sugar using a natural high-intensity sweetener, stevia. MDPI 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7466183/ /pubmed/32751835 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9081026 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Tao, Ran
Cho, Sungeun
Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
title Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
title_full Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
title_fullStr Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
title_full_unstemmed Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
title_short Consumer-Based Sensory Characterization of Steviol Glycosides (Rebaudioside A, D, and M)
title_sort consumer-based sensory characterization of steviol glycosides (rebaudioside a, d, and m)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32751835
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9081026
work_keys_str_mv AT taoran consumerbasedsensorycharacterizationofsteviolglycosidesrebaudiosideadandm
AT chosungeun consumerbasedsensorycharacterizationofsteviolglycosidesrebaudiosideadandm