Cargando…

Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Background and Objectives: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance is the current gold standard for catheter-based procedures in the treatment of structural heart diseases. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), which can be performed under local anesthesia, has been recently introduced and is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moon, Jeonggeun, Park, Yeonjeong, Park, Su Jung, Oh, Pyung Chun, Jang, Albert Youngwoo, Chung, Wook-Jin, Kang, Woong Chol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56080401
_version_ 1783577797854232576
author Moon, Jeonggeun
Park, Yeonjeong
Park, Su Jung
Oh, Pyung Chun
Jang, Albert Youngwoo
Chung, Wook-Jin
Kang, Woong Chol
author_facet Moon, Jeonggeun
Park, Yeonjeong
Park, Su Jung
Oh, Pyung Chun
Jang, Albert Youngwoo
Chung, Wook-Jin
Kang, Woong Chol
author_sort Moon, Jeonggeun
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance is the current gold standard for catheter-based procedures in the treatment of structural heart diseases. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), which can be performed under local anesthesia, has been recently introduced and is becoming more widely used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ICE and TEE in patent foramen ovale (PFO) device closure. Materials and Methods: All 74 patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke undergoing PFO closure for secondary prophylaxis were selected from our registry. Intraprocedural TEE was performed by echocardiographer-cardiologists with the patient under general anesthesia. Conversely, ICE was performed with the patient under local anesthesia. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and immediate outcomes were compared between the TEE and ICE groups (n = 49 and n = 25, respectively). Results: Although patients in the ICE group were older (47 ± 10 vs. 57 ± 7 years, p < 0.001), sex and comorbidity variables were similar between the two groups. The degree of inducible right-to-left shunt via the PFO, assessed using preprocedural TEE, was also comparable. Notably, fluoroscopy time (22 ± 18 vs. 16 ± 7 min, p = 0.030), radiation dose (498 ± 880 vs. 196 ± 111 mGy, p = 0.022), and total procedural time in the catheter laboratory (99 ± 30 vs. 67 ± 12 min, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the ICE group than those in the TEE group. The entire hospital stay was similar between groups (3.8 ± 2.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.433). No procedural complications, such as device embolization, pericardial hemorrhage, major bleeding, mortality, or access-related vascular injury were reported in either group. Conclusions: ICE-guided PFO device closure is quicker and less hazardous in terms of radiation exposure than the TEE-guided procedure, with similar procedural outcomes and duration of hospital stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7466370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74663702020-09-14 Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Moon, Jeonggeun Park, Yeonjeong Park, Su Jung Oh, Pyung Chun Jang, Albert Youngwoo Chung, Wook-Jin Kang, Woong Chol Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance is the current gold standard for catheter-based procedures in the treatment of structural heart diseases. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), which can be performed under local anesthesia, has been recently introduced and is becoming more widely used. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ICE and TEE in patent foramen ovale (PFO) device closure. Materials and Methods: All 74 patients with a history of cryptogenic stroke undergoing PFO closure for secondary prophylaxis were selected from our registry. Intraprocedural TEE was performed by echocardiographer-cardiologists with the patient under general anesthesia. Conversely, ICE was performed with the patient under local anesthesia. Baseline characteristics, procedural details, and immediate outcomes were compared between the TEE and ICE groups (n = 49 and n = 25, respectively). Results: Although patients in the ICE group were older (47 ± 10 vs. 57 ± 7 years, p < 0.001), sex and comorbidity variables were similar between the two groups. The degree of inducible right-to-left shunt via the PFO, assessed using preprocedural TEE, was also comparable. Notably, fluoroscopy time (22 ± 18 vs. 16 ± 7 min, p = 0.030), radiation dose (498 ± 880 vs. 196 ± 111 mGy, p = 0.022), and total procedural time in the catheter laboratory (99 ± 30 vs. 67 ± 12 min, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the ICE group than those in the TEE group. The entire hospital stay was similar between groups (3.8 ± 2.2 vs. 3.4 ± 1.3 days, p = 0.433). No procedural complications, such as device embolization, pericardial hemorrhage, major bleeding, mortality, or access-related vascular injury were reported in either group. Conclusions: ICE-guided PFO device closure is quicker and less hazardous in terms of radiation exposure than the TEE-guided procedure, with similar procedural outcomes and duration of hospital stay. MDPI 2020-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7466370/ /pubmed/32784843 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56080401 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Moon, Jeonggeun
Park, Yeonjeong
Park, Su Jung
Oh, Pyung Chun
Jang, Albert Youngwoo
Chung, Wook-Jin
Kang, Woong Chol
Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
title Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
title_full Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
title_fullStr Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
title_short Comparison of Intracardiac Echocardiography and Transesophageal Echocardiography for Image Guidance in Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure
title_sort comparison of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for image guidance in percutaneous patent foramen ovale closure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466370/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32784843
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina56080401
work_keys_str_mv AT moonjeonggeun comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure
AT parkyeonjeong comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure
AT parksujung comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure
AT ohpyungchun comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure
AT jangalbertyoungwoo comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure
AT chungwookjin comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure
AT kangwoongchol comparisonofintracardiacechocardiographyandtransesophagealechocardiographyforimageguidanceinpercutaneouspatentforamenovaleclosure