Cargando…

Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined. PURPOSE: To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shultz, Christopher L., Schrader, Samuel N., Packard, Benjamin D., Wascher, Daniel C., Treme, Gehron P., Richter, Dustin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120945654
_version_ 1783577911114072064
author Shultz, Christopher L.
Schrader, Samuel N.
Packard, Benjamin D.
Wascher, Daniel C.
Treme, Gehron P.
Richter, Dustin L.
author_facet Shultz, Christopher L.
Schrader, Samuel N.
Packard, Benjamin D.
Wascher, Daniel C.
Treme, Gehron P.
Richter, Dustin L.
author_sort Shultz, Christopher L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined. PURPOSE: To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded. RESULTS: Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7466890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74668902020-09-16 Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary? Shultz, Christopher L. Schrader, Samuel N. Packard, Benjamin D. Wascher, Daniel C. Treme, Gehron P. Richter, Dustin L. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Although medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is well described for patellar instability, the utility of arthroscopy at the time of stabilization has not been fully defined. PURPOSE: To determine whether diagnostic arthroscopy in conjunction with MPFL reconstruction is associated with improvement in functional outcome, pain, and stability or a decrease in perioperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary MPFL reconstruction without tibial tubercle osteotomy were reviewed (96 patients, 101 knees). Knees were divided into MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy (n = 37), MPFL reconstruction with diagnostic arthroscopy (n = 41), and MPFL reconstruction with a targeted arthroscopic procedure (n = 23). Postoperative pain, motion, imaging, operative findings, perioperative complications, need for revision procedure, and postoperative Kujala scores were recorded. RESULTS: Pain at 2 weeks and 3 months postoperatively was similar between groups. Significantly improved knee flexion at 2 weeks was seen after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and reconstruction with targeted arthroscopic procedures (58° vs 42° and 48°, respectively; P = .02). Significantly longer tourniquet times were seen for targeted arthroscopic procedures versus the diagnostic and no arthroscopic procedures (73 vs 57 and 58 min, respectively; P = .0002), and significantly higher Kujala scores at follow-up were recorded after MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy versus reconstruction with diagnostic and targeted arthroscopic procedures (87.8 vs 80.2 and 70.1, respectively; P = .05; 42% response rate). There was no difference between groups in knee flexion, recurrent instability, or perioperative complications at 3 months. Diagnostic arthroscopy yielded findings not previously appreciated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 35% of patients, usually resulting in partial meniscectomy. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic arthroscopy with MPFL reconstruction may result in findings not previously appreciated on MRI. Postoperative pain, range of motion, and risk of complications were equal at 3 months postoperatively with or without arthroscopy. Despite higher Kujala scores in MPFL reconstruction without arthroscopy, the relationship between arthroscopy and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Surgeons can consider diagnostic arthroscopy but should be aware of no clear benefits in patient outcomes. SAGE Publications 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7466890/ /pubmed/32944586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120945654 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Shultz, Christopher L.
Schrader, Samuel N.
Packard, Benjamin D.
Wascher, Daniel C.
Treme, Gehron P.
Richter, Dustin L.
Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
title Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
title_full Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
title_fullStr Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
title_short Is Diagnostic Arthroscopy at the Time of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Necessary?
title_sort is diagnostic arthroscopy at the time of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction necessary?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120945654
work_keys_str_mv AT shultzchristopherl isdiagnosticarthroscopyatthetimeofmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionnecessary
AT schradersamueln isdiagnosticarthroscopyatthetimeofmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionnecessary
AT packardbenjamind isdiagnosticarthroscopyatthetimeofmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionnecessary
AT wascherdanielc isdiagnosticarthroscopyatthetimeofmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionnecessary
AT tremegehronp isdiagnosticarthroscopyatthetimeofmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionnecessary
AT richterdustinl isdiagnosticarthroscopyatthetimeofmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstructionnecessary