Cargando…

Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: A sensitive test reflecting subtle sensorimotor changes throughout disease progression independent of mobility impairment is currently lacking in progressive multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVES: We examined non-ambulatory measures of upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function that may re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miehm, Jules D, Buonaccorsi, John, Lim, Jongil, Sato, Sumire, Rajala, Caitlin, Averill, Julianna, Khalighinejad, Farnaz, Ionete, Carolina, Jones, Stephanie L, Kent, Jane A, van Emmerik, Richard EA
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217320934835
_version_ 1783577913161940992
author Miehm, Jules D
Buonaccorsi, John
Lim, Jongil
Sato, Sumire
Rajala, Caitlin
Averill, Julianna
Khalighinejad, Farnaz
Ionete, Carolina
Jones, Stephanie L
Kent, Jane A
van Emmerik, Richard EA
author_facet Miehm, Jules D
Buonaccorsi, John
Lim, Jongil
Sato, Sumire
Rajala, Caitlin
Averill, Julianna
Khalighinejad, Farnaz
Ionete, Carolina
Jones, Stephanie L
Kent, Jane A
van Emmerik, Richard EA
author_sort Miehm, Jules D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A sensitive test reflecting subtle sensorimotor changes throughout disease progression independent of mobility impairment is currently lacking in progressive multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVES: We examined non-ambulatory measures of upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function that may reveal differences between relapsing–remitting and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Cutaneous sensitivity, proprioception, central motor function and mobility were assessed in 32 relapsing–remitting and 31 progressive multiple sclerosis patients and 30 non-multiple sclerosis controls. RESULTS: Cutaneous sensation differed between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis at the foot and to a lesser extent the hand. Proprioception function in the upper but not the lower extremity differed between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis, but was different for both upper and lower extremities between multiple sclerosis patients and non-multiple sclerosis controls. Foot-tap but not hand-tap speed was slower in progressive compared to relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, suggestive of greater central motor function impairment in the lower extremity in progressive multiple sclerosis. In addition, the non-ambulatory sensorimotor measures were more sensitive in detecting differences between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis than mobility assessed with the 25-foot walk test. CONCLUSION: This study provides novel information about changes in sensorimotor function in progressive compared with relapsing–remitting forms of multiple sclerosis, and in particular the importance of assessing both upper and lower extremity function. Importantly, our findings showed loss of proprioceptive function in multiple sclerosis but also in progressive compared to relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7466899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74668992020-09-16 Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis Miehm, Jules D Buonaccorsi, John Lim, Jongil Sato, Sumire Rajala, Caitlin Averill, Julianna Khalighinejad, Farnaz Ionete, Carolina Jones, Stephanie L Kent, Jane A van Emmerik, Richard EA Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Paper BACKGROUND: A sensitive test reflecting subtle sensorimotor changes throughout disease progression independent of mobility impairment is currently lacking in progressive multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVES: We examined non-ambulatory measures of upper and lower extremity sensorimotor function that may reveal differences between relapsing–remitting and progressive forms of multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Cutaneous sensitivity, proprioception, central motor function and mobility were assessed in 32 relapsing–remitting and 31 progressive multiple sclerosis patients and 30 non-multiple sclerosis controls. RESULTS: Cutaneous sensation differed between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis at the foot and to a lesser extent the hand. Proprioception function in the upper but not the lower extremity differed between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis, but was different for both upper and lower extremities between multiple sclerosis patients and non-multiple sclerosis controls. Foot-tap but not hand-tap speed was slower in progressive compared to relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis, suggestive of greater central motor function impairment in the lower extremity in progressive multiple sclerosis. In addition, the non-ambulatory sensorimotor measures were more sensitive in detecting differences between relapsing–remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis than mobility assessed with the 25-foot walk test. CONCLUSION: This study provides novel information about changes in sensorimotor function in progressive compared with relapsing–remitting forms of multiple sclerosis, and in particular the importance of assessing both upper and lower extremity function. Importantly, our findings showed loss of proprioceptive function in multiple sclerosis but also in progressive compared to relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. SAGE Publications 2020-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7466899/ /pubmed/32944271 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217320934835 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Paper
Miehm, Jules D
Buonaccorsi, John
Lim, Jongil
Sato, Sumire
Rajala, Caitlin
Averill, Julianna
Khalighinejad, Farnaz
Ionete, Carolina
Jones, Stephanie L
Kent, Jane A
van Emmerik, Richard EA
Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
title Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
title_full Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
title_short Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
title_sort sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis
topic Original Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32944271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217320934835
work_keys_str_mv AT miehmjulesd sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT buonaccorsijohn sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT limjongil sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT satosumire sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT rajalacaitlin sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT averilljulianna sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT khalighinejadfarnaz sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT ionetecarolina sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT jonesstephaniel sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT kentjanea sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis
AT vanemmerikrichardea sensorimotorfunctioninprogressivemultiplesclerosis