Cargando…
Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera)
Measuring genome size across different species can yield important insights into evolution of the genome and allow for more informed decisions when designing next-generation genomic sequencing projects. New techniques for estimating genome size using shallow genomic sequence data have emerged which...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32601059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401028 |
_version_ | 1783577930100637696 |
---|---|
author | Pflug, James M. Holmes, Valerie Renee Burrus, Crystal Johnston, J. Spencer Maddison, David R. |
author_facet | Pflug, James M. Holmes, Valerie Renee Burrus, Crystal Johnston, J. Spencer Maddison, David R. |
author_sort | Pflug, James M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Measuring genome size across different species can yield important insights into evolution of the genome and allow for more informed decisions when designing next-generation genomic sequencing projects. New techniques for estimating genome size using shallow genomic sequence data have emerged which have the potential to augment our knowledge of genome sizes, yet these methods have only been used in a limited number of empirical studies. In this project, we compare estimation methods using next-generation sequencing (k-mer methods and average read depth of single-copy genes) to measurements from flow cytometry, a standard method for genome size measures, using ground beetles (Carabidae) and other members of the beetle suborder Adephaga as our test system. We also present a new protocol for using read-depth of single-copy genes to estimate genome size. Additionally, we report flow cytometry measurements for five previously unmeasured carabid species, as well as 21 new draft genomes and six new draft transcriptomes across eight species of adephagan beetles. No single sequence-based method performed well on all species, and all tended to underestimate the genome sizes, although only slightly in most samples. For one species, Bembidion sp. nr. transversale, most sequence-based methods yielded estimates half the size suggested by flow cytometry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7466995 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74669952020-09-14 Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) Pflug, James M. Holmes, Valerie Renee Burrus, Crystal Johnston, J. Spencer Maddison, David R. G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Measuring genome size across different species can yield important insights into evolution of the genome and allow for more informed decisions when designing next-generation genomic sequencing projects. New techniques for estimating genome size using shallow genomic sequence data have emerged which have the potential to augment our knowledge of genome sizes, yet these methods have only been used in a limited number of empirical studies. In this project, we compare estimation methods using next-generation sequencing (k-mer methods and average read depth of single-copy genes) to measurements from flow cytometry, a standard method for genome size measures, using ground beetles (Carabidae) and other members of the beetle suborder Adephaga as our test system. We also present a new protocol for using read-depth of single-copy genes to estimate genome size. Additionally, we report flow cytometry measurements for five previously unmeasured carabid species, as well as 21 new draft genomes and six new draft transcriptomes across eight species of adephagan beetles. No single sequence-based method performed well on all species, and all tended to underestimate the genome sizes, although only slightly in most samples. For one species, Bembidion sp. nr. transversale, most sequence-based methods yielded estimates half the size suggested by flow cytometry. Genetics Society of America 2020-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7466995/ /pubmed/32601059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401028 Text en Copyright © 2020 Pflug et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Investigations Pflug, James M. Holmes, Valerie Renee Burrus, Crystal Johnston, J. Spencer Maddison, David R. Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) |
title | Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) |
title_full | Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) |
title_fullStr | Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) |
title_short | Measuring Genome Sizes Using Read-Depth, k-mers, and Flow Cytometry: Methodological Comparisons in Beetles (Coleoptera) |
title_sort | measuring genome sizes using read-depth, k-mers, and flow cytometry: methodological comparisons in beetles (coleoptera) |
topic | Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7466995/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32601059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pflugjamesm measuringgenomesizesusingreaddepthkmersandflowcytometrymethodologicalcomparisonsinbeetlescoleoptera AT holmesvalerierenee measuringgenomesizesusingreaddepthkmersandflowcytometrymethodologicalcomparisonsinbeetlescoleoptera AT burruscrystal measuringgenomesizesusingreaddepthkmersandflowcytometrymethodologicalcomparisonsinbeetlescoleoptera AT johnstonjspencer measuringgenomesizesusingreaddepthkmersandflowcytometrymethodologicalcomparisonsinbeetlescoleoptera AT maddisondavidr measuringgenomesizesusingreaddepthkmersandflowcytometrymethodologicalcomparisonsinbeetlescoleoptera |