Cargando…
The effect of copartisan justice ministers on human rights in presidential democracies
A body of literature suggests that states with independent courts are more likely to protect human rights. A recent article challenges this notion by arguing that when both the president and his or her justice minister share the same party—i.e., they are copartisans—that state is less likely to prot...
Autor principal: | Holzer, Joshua |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467281/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234938 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Unequal treatment toward copartisans versus non-copartisans is reduced when partisanship can be falsified
por: Abascal, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The effect of two-round presidential elections on human rights
por: Holzer, Joshua
Publicado: (2020) -
Correction: Unequal treatment toward copartisans versus non-copartisans is reduced when partisanship can be falsified
por: Abascal, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Electoral laws and the survival of presidential democracies /
Publicado: (1995) -
Reevaluating the presidential runoff rule: Does a provision promote the protection of human rights?
por: Holzer, Joshua
Publicado: (2019)