Cargando…

Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy

OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse rates; however, effectiveness of treatments may vary. It is important to understand real-world treatment patterns in the context of MS relapses. We describe MS relapses related to treatment patterns among patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowen, James, Mehta, Rina, Pelletier, Corey, Tian, Marc, Noxon, Virginia, Johnson, Barbara H., Bonafede, Machaon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1
_version_ 1783578006498836480
author Bowen, James
Mehta, Rina
Pelletier, Corey
Tian, Marc
Noxon, Virginia
Johnson, Barbara H.
Bonafede, Machaon
author_facet Bowen, James
Mehta, Rina
Pelletier, Corey
Tian, Marc
Noxon, Virginia
Johnson, Barbara H.
Bonafede, Machaon
author_sort Bowen, James
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse rates; however, effectiveness of treatments may vary. It is important to understand real-world treatment patterns in the context of MS relapses. We describe MS relapses related to treatment patterns among patients who switch treatment after their first DMT. METHODS: IBM MarketScan research databases were used to identify adult patients with MS who switched DMTs (index-first switch) after being newly treated with a DMT from January 2009 through March 2017, with 12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuing (at least 60 days without DMT) or switching DMTs. MS relapses were defined using a validated claims-based algorithm. Multivariable analysis was used to examine odds of 12-month persistence, odds of post-index relapse, and number of relapses. RESULTS: In total, 4121 patients with MS met all inclusion criteria (mean age 46.4 years; female 76.2%). Overall, 49.6% switched to an oral DMT, 36.5% to an injectable DMT, and 13.9% to an infusion DMT. Switching DMTs resulted in a 32.4% reduction in relapses between pre- and post-index. Only 54.6% of patients were persistent throughout the first year. Patients who switched to oral DMTs had 95% higher adjusted odds of persistence and 18% lower adjusted odds of a post-index period relapse than patients who switched to injectable DMTs. The number of baseline relapses was not associated with persistence but with 68% higher odds of a post-index relapse, with each additional baseline relapse associated with a 44% increase in number of post-index relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MS who switched DMTs, persistence was consistently low regardless of treatment. Although persistence with oral DMTs was slightly higher than with injectable DMTs, overall results indicate poor persistence to second-line therapy and highlight the need to improve long-term persistence with DMTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467407
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74674072020-09-11 Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy Bowen, James Mehta, Rina Pelletier, Corey Tian, Marc Noxon, Virginia Johnson, Barbara H. Bonafede, Machaon Adv Ther Original Research OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse rates; however, effectiveness of treatments may vary. It is important to understand real-world treatment patterns in the context of MS relapses. We describe MS relapses related to treatment patterns among patients who switch treatment after their first DMT. METHODS: IBM MarketScan research databases were used to identify adult patients with MS who switched DMTs (index-first switch) after being newly treated with a DMT from January 2009 through March 2017, with 12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuing (at least 60 days without DMT) or switching DMTs. MS relapses were defined using a validated claims-based algorithm. Multivariable analysis was used to examine odds of 12-month persistence, odds of post-index relapse, and number of relapses. RESULTS: In total, 4121 patients with MS met all inclusion criteria (mean age 46.4 years; female 76.2%). Overall, 49.6% switched to an oral DMT, 36.5% to an injectable DMT, and 13.9% to an infusion DMT. Switching DMTs resulted in a 32.4% reduction in relapses between pre- and post-index. Only 54.6% of patients were persistent throughout the first year. Patients who switched to oral DMTs had 95% higher adjusted odds of persistence and 18% lower adjusted odds of a post-index period relapse than patients who switched to injectable DMTs. The number of baseline relapses was not associated with persistence but with 68% higher odds of a post-index relapse, with each additional baseline relapse associated with a 44% increase in number of post-index relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MS who switched DMTs, persistence was consistently low regardless of treatment. Although persistence with oral DMTs was slightly higher than with injectable DMTs, overall results indicate poor persistence to second-line therapy and highlight the need to improve long-term persistence with DMTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-05-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7467407/ /pubmed/32436028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bowen, James
Mehta, Rina
Pelletier, Corey
Tian, Marc
Noxon, Virginia
Johnson, Barbara H.
Bonafede, Machaon
Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_full Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_fullStr Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_short Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
title_sort treatment patterns among patients with multiple sclerosis initiating second-line disease-modifying therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenjames treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT mehtarina treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT pelletiercorey treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT tianmarc treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT noxonvirginia treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT johnsonbarbarah treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy
AT bonafedemachaon treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy