Cargando…
Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy
OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse rates; however, effectiveness of treatments may vary. It is important to understand real-world treatment patterns in the context of MS relapses. We describe MS relapses related to treatment patterns among patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1 |
_version_ | 1783578006498836480 |
---|---|
author | Bowen, James Mehta, Rina Pelletier, Corey Tian, Marc Noxon, Virginia Johnson, Barbara H. Bonafede, Machaon |
author_facet | Bowen, James Mehta, Rina Pelletier, Corey Tian, Marc Noxon, Virginia Johnson, Barbara H. Bonafede, Machaon |
author_sort | Bowen, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse rates; however, effectiveness of treatments may vary. It is important to understand real-world treatment patterns in the context of MS relapses. We describe MS relapses related to treatment patterns among patients who switch treatment after their first DMT. METHODS: IBM MarketScan research databases were used to identify adult patients with MS who switched DMTs (index-first switch) after being newly treated with a DMT from January 2009 through March 2017, with 12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuing (at least 60 days without DMT) or switching DMTs. MS relapses were defined using a validated claims-based algorithm. Multivariable analysis was used to examine odds of 12-month persistence, odds of post-index relapse, and number of relapses. RESULTS: In total, 4121 patients with MS met all inclusion criteria (mean age 46.4 years; female 76.2%). Overall, 49.6% switched to an oral DMT, 36.5% to an injectable DMT, and 13.9% to an infusion DMT. Switching DMTs resulted in a 32.4% reduction in relapses between pre- and post-index. Only 54.6% of patients were persistent throughout the first year. Patients who switched to oral DMTs had 95% higher adjusted odds of persistence and 18% lower adjusted odds of a post-index period relapse than patients who switched to injectable DMTs. The number of baseline relapses was not associated with persistence but with 68% higher odds of a post-index relapse, with each additional baseline relapse associated with a 44% increase in number of post-index relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MS who switched DMTs, persistence was consistently low regardless of treatment. Although persistence with oral DMTs was slightly higher than with injectable DMTs, overall results indicate poor persistence to second-line therapy and highlight the need to improve long-term persistence with DMTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7467407 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74674072020-09-11 Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy Bowen, James Mehta, Rina Pelletier, Corey Tian, Marc Noxon, Virginia Johnson, Barbara H. Bonafede, Machaon Adv Ther Original Research OBJECTIVE: Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) can reduce multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse rates; however, effectiveness of treatments may vary. It is important to understand real-world treatment patterns in the context of MS relapses. We describe MS relapses related to treatment patterns among patients who switch treatment after their first DMT. METHODS: IBM MarketScan research databases were used to identify adult patients with MS who switched DMTs (index-first switch) after being newly treated with a DMT from January 2009 through March 2017, with 12 months of continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Non-persistence was defined as discontinuing (at least 60 days without DMT) or switching DMTs. MS relapses were defined using a validated claims-based algorithm. Multivariable analysis was used to examine odds of 12-month persistence, odds of post-index relapse, and number of relapses. RESULTS: In total, 4121 patients with MS met all inclusion criteria (mean age 46.4 years; female 76.2%). Overall, 49.6% switched to an oral DMT, 36.5% to an injectable DMT, and 13.9% to an infusion DMT. Switching DMTs resulted in a 32.4% reduction in relapses between pre- and post-index. Only 54.6% of patients were persistent throughout the first year. Patients who switched to oral DMTs had 95% higher adjusted odds of persistence and 18% lower adjusted odds of a post-index period relapse than patients who switched to injectable DMTs. The number of baseline relapses was not associated with persistence but with 68% higher odds of a post-index relapse, with each additional baseline relapse associated with a 44% increase in number of post-index relapses. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MS who switched DMTs, persistence was consistently low regardless of treatment. Although persistence with oral DMTs was slightly higher than with injectable DMTs, overall results indicate poor persistence to second-line therapy and highlight the need to improve long-term persistence with DMTs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-05-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7467407/ /pubmed/32436028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bowen, James Mehta, Rina Pelletier, Corey Tian, Marc Noxon, Virginia Johnson, Barbara H. Bonafede, Machaon Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy |
title | Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy |
title_full | Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy |
title_fullStr | Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy |
title_short | Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Initiating Second-Line Disease-Modifying Therapy |
title_sort | treatment patterns among patients with multiple sclerosis initiating second-line disease-modifying therapy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467407/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32436028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01367-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowenjames treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy AT mehtarina treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy AT pelletiercorey treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy AT tianmarc treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy AT noxonvirginia treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy AT johnsonbarbarah treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy AT bonafedemachaon treatmentpatternsamongpatientswithmultiplesclerosisinitiatingsecondlinediseasemodifyingtherapy |