Cargando…

Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with established clinical efficacy. However, little is known about their efficacy compared with each other. This network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated the comparative efficacy of JAK inhibitor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pope, Janet, Sawant, Ruta, Tundia, Namita, Du, Ella X., Qi, Cynthia Z., Song, Yan, Tang, Patrick, Betts, Keith A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3
_version_ 1783578016540000256
author Pope, Janet
Sawant, Ruta
Tundia, Namita
Du, Ella X.
Qi, Cynthia Z.
Song, Yan
Tang, Patrick
Betts, Keith A.
author_facet Pope, Janet
Sawant, Ruta
Tundia, Namita
Du, Ella X.
Qi, Cynthia Z.
Song, Yan
Tang, Patrick
Betts, Keith A.
author_sort Pope, Janet
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with established clinical efficacy. However, little is known about their efficacy compared with each other. This network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated the comparative efficacy of JAK inhibitors currently approved for RA. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of three approved JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) as monotherapy or combination therapy among patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD-IR). Using Bayesian NMA, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses and clinical remission (defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6) were evaluated separately at 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were identified and included in the NMA. All JAK inhibitors demonstrated significantly better efficacy than csDMARD. Among combination therapies, upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest 12-week ACR50 responses (median [95% credible interval]: 43.4% [33.4%, 54.5%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (38.7% [28.6%, 49.8%]), baricitinib 2 mg (37.1% [25.0%, 50.6%]), and baricitinib 4 mg (36.7%, [27.2%, 47.0%]). Similar results were observed for ACR20/70 and at week 24. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD was also found to have the highest clinical remission rates at week 12 (29.8% [16.9%, 47.0%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (24.3%, [12.7%, 40.2%]), baricitinib 4 mg (22.8%, [11.8%, 37.5%]), and baricitinib 2 mg (20.1%, [8.6%, 37.4%]). Similar results were seen at week 24. Among monotherapies, upadacitinib had a higher ACR50 response (38.5% [25.3%, 53.2%]) than tofacitinib (30.4% [18.3%, 45.5%]). The differences in efficacy measures were not statistically significant between the JAK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The NMA found that upadacitinib 15 mg once daily had numerically higher efficacy in terms of ACR response and clinical remission among approved JAK combination therapies and monotherapies for csDMARD-IR patients with RA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74674532020-09-11 Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis Pope, Janet Sawant, Ruta Tundia, Namita Du, Ella X. Qi, Cynthia Z. Song, Yan Tang, Patrick Betts, Keith A. Adv Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a class of targeted therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with established clinical efficacy. However, little is known about their efficacy compared with each other. This network meta-analysis (NMA) estimated the comparative efficacy of JAK inhibitors currently approved for RA. METHODS: A targeted literature review was conducted for phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of three approved JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) as monotherapy or combination therapy among patients with moderate-to-severe RA who had inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARD-IR). Using Bayesian NMA, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20/50/70 responses and clinical remission (defined as DAS28-CRP < 2.6) were evaluated separately at 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were identified and included in the NMA. All JAK inhibitors demonstrated significantly better efficacy than csDMARD. Among combination therapies, upadacitinib 15 mg had the highest 12-week ACR50 responses (median [95% credible interval]: 43.4% [33.4%, 54.5%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (38.7% [28.6%, 49.8%]), baricitinib 2 mg (37.1% [25.0%, 50.6%]), and baricitinib 4 mg (36.7%, [27.2%, 47.0%]). Similar results were observed for ACR20/70 and at week 24. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD was also found to have the highest clinical remission rates at week 12 (29.8% [16.9%, 47.0%]), followed by tofacitinib 5 mg (24.3%, [12.7%, 40.2%]), baricitinib 4 mg (22.8%, [11.8%, 37.5%]), and baricitinib 2 mg (20.1%, [8.6%, 37.4%]). Similar results were seen at week 24. Among monotherapies, upadacitinib had a higher ACR50 response (38.5% [25.3%, 53.2%]) than tofacitinib (30.4% [18.3%, 45.5%]). The differences in efficacy measures were not statistically significant between the JAK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The NMA found that upadacitinib 15 mg once daily had numerically higher efficacy in terms of ACR response and clinical remission among approved JAK combination therapies and monotherapies for csDMARD-IR patients with RA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-04-15 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7467453/ /pubmed/32297280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Pope, Janet
Sawant, Ruta
Tundia, Namita
Du, Ella X.
Qi, Cynthia Z.
Song, Yan
Tang, Patrick
Betts, Keith A.
Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Comparative Efficacy of JAK Inhibitors for Moderate-To-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of jak inhibitors for moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01303-3
work_keys_str_mv AT popejanet comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT sawantruta comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT tundianamita comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT duellax comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT qicynthiaz comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT songyan comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT tangpatrick comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis
AT bettskeitha comparativeefficacyofjakinhibitorsformoderatetosevererheumatoidarthritisanetworkmetaanalysis