Cargando…

Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes and treatment burden between intravitreally administered aflibercept (IVT-AFL) and ranibizumab (RBZ) treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) at 2 years. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohji, Masahito, Lanzetta, Paolo, Korobelnik, Jean-Francois, Wojciechowski, Piotr, Taieb, Vanessa, Deschaseaux, Celine, Janer, Daniel, Tuckmantel, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32222903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01298-x
_version_ 1783578022244253696
author Ohji, Masahito
Lanzetta, Paolo
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Wojciechowski, Piotr
Taieb, Vanessa
Deschaseaux, Celine
Janer, Daniel
Tuckmantel, Claudia
author_facet Ohji, Masahito
Lanzetta, Paolo
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Wojciechowski, Piotr
Taieb, Vanessa
Deschaseaux, Celine
Janer, Daniel
Tuckmantel, Claudia
author_sort Ohji, Masahito
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes and treatment burden between intravitreally administered aflibercept (IVT-AFL) and ranibizumab (RBZ) treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) at 2 years. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL in October 2018. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and/or individual patient data meta-regression was used to connect ALTAIR (assessing IVT-AFL T&E) with other studies, adjusting for between-trial differences in baseline visual acuity and age or baseline visual acuity, age, and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) status. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results, including direct MAIC between IVT-AFL T&E (ALTAIR) and RBZ T&E (CANTREAT and TREX-AMD trials). RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (ALTAIR, VIEW 1 and 2, CATT, CANTREAT, and TREX) were included in the analysis. IVT-AFL T&E was assessed in one study, ALTAIR (n = 255), while RBZ T&E was assessed in two trials (n = 327). At 2 years, the median difference (95% credibility interval) between IVT-AFL T&E and RBZ T&E regarding the numbers of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters gained was not significant (M1: − 2.29 [− 8.10, 3.58]; M2: − 0.55 [− 6.34, 5.29]). IVT-AFL T&E was associated with significantly fewer injections than RBZ-T&E (M1: − 6.12 [− 7.60, − 4.65]; M2: − 5.93 [− 7.42, − 4.45]). Results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main scenarios. CONCLUSION: Patients with wAMD receiving an IVT-AFL T&E regimen achieved and maintained improvement in visual acuity with fewer injections over 2 years compared with RBZ T&E. IVT-AFL T&E may therefore serve as the optimal therapy for wAMD, as it was associated with clinical efficacy and minimized treatment burden. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74674782020-09-11 Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison Ohji, Masahito Lanzetta, Paolo Korobelnik, Jean-Francois Wojciechowski, Piotr Taieb, Vanessa Deschaseaux, Celine Janer, Daniel Tuckmantel, Claudia Adv Ther Original Research PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes and treatment burden between intravitreally administered aflibercept (IVT-AFL) and ranibizumab (RBZ) treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) at 2 years. METHODS: A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL in October 2018. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and/or individual patient data meta-regression was used to connect ALTAIR (assessing IVT-AFL T&E) with other studies, adjusting for between-trial differences in baseline visual acuity and age or baseline visual acuity, age, and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) status. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the robustness of the results, including direct MAIC between IVT-AFL T&E (ALTAIR) and RBZ T&E (CANTREAT and TREX-AMD trials). RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (ALTAIR, VIEW 1 and 2, CATT, CANTREAT, and TREX) were included in the analysis. IVT-AFL T&E was assessed in one study, ALTAIR (n = 255), while RBZ T&E was assessed in two trials (n = 327). At 2 years, the median difference (95% credibility interval) between IVT-AFL T&E and RBZ T&E regarding the numbers of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters gained was not significant (M1: − 2.29 [− 8.10, 3.58]; M2: − 0.55 [− 6.34, 5.29]). IVT-AFL T&E was associated with significantly fewer injections than RBZ-T&E (M1: − 6.12 [− 7.60, − 4.65]; M2: − 5.93 [− 7.42, − 4.45]). Results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main scenarios. CONCLUSION: Patients with wAMD receiving an IVT-AFL T&E regimen achieved and maintained improvement in visual acuity with fewer injections over 2 years compared with RBZ T&E. IVT-AFL T&E may therefore serve as the optimal therapy for wAMD, as it was associated with clinical efficacy and minimized treatment burden. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12325-020-01298-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Healthcare 2020-03-28 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7467478/ /pubmed/32222903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01298-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Ohji, Masahito
Lanzetta, Paolo
Korobelnik, Jean-Francois
Wojciechowski, Piotr
Taieb, Vanessa
Deschaseaux, Celine
Janer, Daniel
Tuckmantel, Claudia
Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
title Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
title_full Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
title_fullStr Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
title_short Efficacy and Treatment Burden of Intravitreal Aflibercept Versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Treat-and-Extend Regimens at 2 Years: Network Meta-Analysis Incorporating Individual Patient Data Meta-Regression and Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison
title_sort efficacy and treatment burden of intravitreal aflibercept versus intravitreal ranibizumab treat-and-extend regimens at 2 years: network meta-analysis incorporating individual patient data meta-regression and matching-adjusted indirect comparison
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32222903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01298-x
work_keys_str_mv AT ohjimasahito efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT lanzettapaolo efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT korobelnikjeanfrancois efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT wojciechowskipiotr efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT taiebvanessa efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT deschaseauxceline efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT janerdaniel efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison
AT tuckmantelclaudia efficacyandtreatmentburdenofintravitrealafliberceptversusintravitrealranibizumabtreatandextendregimensat2yearsnetworkmetaanalysisincorporatingindividualpatientdatametaregressionandmatchingadjustedindirectcomparison