Cargando…
Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data
BACKGROUND: Surveillance of sepsis incidence is important for directing resources and evaluating quality-of-care interventions. The aim was to develop and validate a fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance system in non-intensive care wards using electronic health record (EHR) data, and demonstr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010123 |
_version_ | 1783578027190386688 |
---|---|
author | Valik, John Karlsson Ward, Logan Tanushi, Hideyuki Müllersdorf, Kajsa Ternhag, Anders Aufwerber, Ewa Färnert, Anna Johansson, Anders F Mogensen, Mads Lause Pickering, Brian Dalianis, Hercules Henriksson, Aron Herasevich, Vitaly Nauclér, Pontus |
author_facet | Valik, John Karlsson Ward, Logan Tanushi, Hideyuki Müllersdorf, Kajsa Ternhag, Anders Aufwerber, Ewa Färnert, Anna Johansson, Anders F Mogensen, Mads Lause Pickering, Brian Dalianis, Hercules Henriksson, Aron Herasevich, Vitaly Nauclér, Pontus |
author_sort | Valik, John Karlsson |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surveillance of sepsis incidence is important for directing resources and evaluating quality-of-care interventions. The aim was to develop and validate a fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance system in non-intensive care wards using electronic health record (EHR) data, and demonstrate utility by determining the burden of hospital-onset sepsis and variations between wards. METHODS: A rule-based algorithm was developed using EHR data from a cohort of all adult patients admitted at an academic centre between July 2012 and December 2013. Time in intensive care units was censored. To validate algorithm performance, a stratified random sample of 1000 hospital admissions (674 with and 326 without suspected infection) was classified according to the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria (suspected infection defined as having any culture taken and at least two doses of antimicrobials administered, and an increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by >2 points) and the likelihood of infection by physician medical record review. RESULTS: In total 82 653 hospital admissions were included. The Sepsis-3 clinical criteria determined by physician review were met in 343 of 1000 episodes. Among them, 313 (91%) had possible, probable or definite infection. Based on this reference, the algorithm achieved sensitivity 0.887 (95% CI: 0.799 to 0.964), specificity 0.985 (95% CI: 0.978 to 0.991), positive predictive value 0.881 (95% CI: 0.833 to 0.926) and negative predictive value 0.986 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.996). When applied to the total cohort taking into account the sampling proportions of those with and without suspected infection, the algorithm identified 8599 (10.4%) sepsis episodes. The burden of hospital-onset sepsis (>48 hour after admission) and related in-hospital mortality varied between wards. CONCLUSIONS: A fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance algorithm using EHR data performed well compared with physician medical record review in non-intensive care wards, and exposed variations in hospital-onset sepsis incidence between wards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7467502 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74675022020-09-15 Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data Valik, John Karlsson Ward, Logan Tanushi, Hideyuki Müllersdorf, Kajsa Ternhag, Anders Aufwerber, Ewa Färnert, Anna Johansson, Anders F Mogensen, Mads Lause Pickering, Brian Dalianis, Hercules Henriksson, Aron Herasevich, Vitaly Nauclér, Pontus BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Surveillance of sepsis incidence is important for directing resources and evaluating quality-of-care interventions. The aim was to develop and validate a fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance system in non-intensive care wards using electronic health record (EHR) data, and demonstrate utility by determining the burden of hospital-onset sepsis and variations between wards. METHODS: A rule-based algorithm was developed using EHR data from a cohort of all adult patients admitted at an academic centre between July 2012 and December 2013. Time in intensive care units was censored. To validate algorithm performance, a stratified random sample of 1000 hospital admissions (674 with and 326 without suspected infection) was classified according to the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria (suspected infection defined as having any culture taken and at least two doses of antimicrobials administered, and an increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score by >2 points) and the likelihood of infection by physician medical record review. RESULTS: In total 82 653 hospital admissions were included. The Sepsis-3 clinical criteria determined by physician review were met in 343 of 1000 episodes. Among them, 313 (91%) had possible, probable or definite infection. Based on this reference, the algorithm achieved sensitivity 0.887 (95% CI: 0.799 to 0.964), specificity 0.985 (95% CI: 0.978 to 0.991), positive predictive value 0.881 (95% CI: 0.833 to 0.926) and negative predictive value 0.986 (95% CI: 0.973 to 0.996). When applied to the total cohort taking into account the sampling proportions of those with and without suspected infection, the algorithm identified 8599 (10.4%) sepsis episodes. The burden of hospital-onset sepsis (>48 hour after admission) and related in-hospital mortality varied between wards. CONCLUSIONS: A fully-automated Sepsis-3 based surveillance algorithm using EHR data performed well compared with physician medical record review in non-intensive care wards, and exposed variations in hospital-onset sepsis incidence between wards. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09 2020-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7467502/ /pubmed/32029574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010123 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Valik, John Karlsson Ward, Logan Tanushi, Hideyuki Müllersdorf, Kajsa Ternhag, Anders Aufwerber, Ewa Färnert, Anna Johansson, Anders F Mogensen, Mads Lause Pickering, Brian Dalianis, Hercules Henriksson, Aron Herasevich, Vitaly Nauclér, Pontus Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
title | Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
title_full | Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
title_fullStr | Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
title_short | Validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
title_sort | validation of automated sepsis surveillance based on the sepsis-3 clinical criteria against physician record review in a general hospital population: observational study using electronic health records data |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467502/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32029574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valikjohnkarlsson validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT wardlogan validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT tanushihideyuki validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT mullersdorfkajsa validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT ternhaganders validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT aufwerberewa validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT farnertanna validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT johanssonandersf validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT mogensenmadslause validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT pickeringbrian validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT dalianishercules validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT henrikssonaron validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT herasevichvitaly validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata AT nauclerpontus validationofautomatedsepsissurveillancebasedonthesepsis3clinicalcriteriaagainstphysicianrecordreviewinageneralhospitalpopulationobservationalstudyusingelectronichealthrecordsdata |