Cargando…

Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Despite the non-negligible weight loss failure rate at midterm, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains the reference procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity with metabolic comorbidities. A recently emerged procedure, the single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robert, Maud, Poghosyan, Tigran, Delaunay, Dominique, Pelascini, Elise, Iceta, Sylvain, Sterkers, Adrien, Barsamian, Charles, Khamphommala, Litavan, Bin Dorel, Sylvie, Maucort-Boulch, Delphine, Czernichow, Sebastien, Disse, Emmanuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576
_version_ 1783578028134105088
author Robert, Maud
Poghosyan, Tigran
Delaunay, Dominique
Pelascini, Elise
Iceta, Sylvain
Sterkers, Adrien
Barsamian, Charles
Khamphommala, Litavan
Bin Dorel, Sylvie
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Czernichow, Sebastien
Disse, Emmanuel
author_facet Robert, Maud
Poghosyan, Tigran
Delaunay, Dominique
Pelascini, Elise
Iceta, Sylvain
Sterkers, Adrien
Barsamian, Charles
Khamphommala, Litavan
Bin Dorel, Sylvie
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Czernichow, Sebastien
Disse, Emmanuel
author_sort Robert, Maud
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite the non-negligible weight loss failure rate at midterm, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains the reference procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity with metabolic comorbidities. A recently emerged procedure, the single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), could be more effective on weight loss with similar morbidity and lower weight loss failure rate than RYGB. We propose the first randomised, open, multicentre superiority trial comparing the SADI-S to RYGB (SADISLEEVE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority at 2 years after surgery of the SADI-S compared with RYGB in term of excess weight loss percentage. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of nutritional status, metabolic outcomes, overall complication rates and quality of life, within 2 years after surgery. Key inclusion criteria are obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m(2) or ≥35 kg/m(2) with at least one comorbid condition and candidate to a first bariatric procedure or after failure of sleeve gastrectomy. Patients randomised by minimisation in two arms, based on centre, surgery as a revisional procedure, presence of type 2 diabetes and BMI >50 kg/m(2) will be included over 2 years. A sample size of 166 patients in each group will have a power of 90% to detect a probability of 0.603 that excess weight loss in the RYGB arm is less than excess weight loss in the SADI-S arm with a 5% two-sided significance level. With a drop-out rate of 10%, it will be necessary to include 183 patients per group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan (CPP1089-HPS1). Study was also approved by the French national agency for drug safety (2018061500148). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03610256.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7467507
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74675072020-09-11 Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol Robert, Maud Poghosyan, Tigran Delaunay, Dominique Pelascini, Elise Iceta, Sylvain Sterkers, Adrien Barsamian, Charles Khamphommala, Litavan Bin Dorel, Sylvie Maucort-Boulch, Delphine Czernichow, Sebastien Disse, Emmanuel BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism INTRODUCTION: Despite the non-negligible weight loss failure rate at midterm, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) remains the reference procedure in the treatment of morbid obesity with metabolic comorbidities. A recently emerged procedure, the single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S), could be more effective on weight loss with similar morbidity and lower weight loss failure rate than RYGB. We propose the first randomised, open, multicentre superiority trial comparing the SADI-S to RYGB (SADISLEEVE). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The main objective is to demonstrate the superiority at 2 years after surgery of the SADI-S compared with RYGB in term of excess weight loss percentage. The secondary objectives are the evaluation of nutritional status, metabolic outcomes, overall complication rates and quality of life, within 2 years after surgery. Key inclusion criteria are obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m(2) or ≥35 kg/m(2) with at least one comorbid condition and candidate to a first bariatric procedure or after failure of sleeve gastrectomy. Patients randomised by minimisation in two arms, based on centre, surgery as a revisional procedure, presence of type 2 diabetes and BMI >50 kg/m(2) will be included over 2 years. A sample size of 166 patients in each group will have a power of 90% to detect a probability of 0.603 that excess weight loss in the RYGB arm is less than excess weight loss in the SADI-S arm with a 5% two-sided significance level. With a drop-out rate of 10%, it will be necessary to include 183 patients per group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by Institutional Review Board of Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Morvan (CPP1089-HPS1). Study was also approved by the French national agency for drug safety (2018061500148). Results will be reported in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03610256. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7467507/ /pubmed/32873678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Nutrition and Metabolism
Robert, Maud
Poghosyan, Tigran
Delaunay, Dominique
Pelascini, Elise
Iceta, Sylvain
Sterkers, Adrien
Barsamian, Charles
Khamphommala, Litavan
Bin Dorel, Sylvie
Maucort-Boulch, Delphine
Czernichow, Sebastien
Disse, Emmanuel
Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol
title Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol
title_full Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol
title_fullStr Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol
title_short Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol
title_sort prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (sadi-s) versus roux-en-y gastric bypass (rygb): sadisleeve study protocol
topic Nutrition and Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467507/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576
work_keys_str_mv AT robertmaud prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT poghosyantigran prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT delaunaydominique prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT pelascinielise prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT icetasylvain prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT sterkersadrien prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT barsamiancharles prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT khamphommalalitavan prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT bindorelsylvie prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT maucortboulchdelphine prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT czernichowsebastien prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol
AT disseemmanuel prospectivemulticentrerandomisedtrialcomparingtheefficacyandsafetyofsingleanastomosisduodenoilealbypasswithsleevegastrectomysadisversusrouxenygastricbypassrygbsadisleevestudyprotocol