Measuring intradialyser transmembrane and hydrostatic pressures: pitfalls and relevance in haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND: Post-dilutional haemodiafiltration (HDF) with high convection volumes (HCVs) could improve survival. HCV-HDF requires a significant pressure to be applied to the dialyser membrane. The aim of this study was to assess the pressure applied to the dialysers in HCV-HDF, evaluate the influence of transmembrane pressure (TMP) calculation methods on TMP values and check how they relate to the safety limits proposed by guidelines. METHODS: Nine stable dialysis patients were treated with post-dilutional HCV-HDF with three different convection volumes [including haemodialysis (HD)]. The pressures at blood inlet (B(i)), blood outlet (B(o)) and dialysate outlet (D(o)) were continuously recorded. TMP was calculated using two pressures (TMP2: B(o), D(o)) or three pressures (TMP3: B(o), D(o), B(i)). Dialysis parameters were analysed at the start of the session and at the end of treatment or at the first occurrence of a manual intervention to decrease convection due to TMP alarms. RESULTS: During HD sessions, TMP2 and TMP3 remained stable. During HCV-HDF, TMP2 remained stable while TMP3 clearly increased. For the same condition, TMP3 could be 3-fold greater than TMP2. This shows that the TMP limit of 300 mmHg as recommended by guidelines could have different effects according to the TMP calculation method. In HCV-HDF, the pressure at the B(i) increased over time and exceeded the safety limits of 600 mmHg provided by the manufacturer, even when respecting TMP safety limits. CONCLUSIONS: This study draws our attention to the dangers of using a two-pressure points TMP calculation, particularly when performing HCV-HDF.