Cargando…
A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain and edema are the most common problems associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare ice wrap and subacromial injection (SI) as treatments for early postop pain and edema control and to contrast them with a control gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00556-6 |
_version_ | 1783578132006043648 |
---|---|
author | Kara, Yavuz Selim Hapa, Onur Işın, Yağmur Kılıç, Ali İhsan Havitçioğlu, Hasan |
author_facet | Kara, Yavuz Selim Hapa, Onur Işın, Yağmur Kılıç, Ali İhsan Havitçioğlu, Hasan |
author_sort | Kara, Yavuz Selim |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain and edema are the most common problems associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare ice wrap and subacromial injection (SI) as treatments for early postop pain and edema control and to contrast them with a control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized into three groups: 23 patients who received an ice wrap, 20 patients who received a SI, and a control group of 16 patients. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, tear retraction, degree of fatty muscle degeneration, surgical procedures, and amount of irrigation fluid were similar for the three groups, which also showed similar results regarding postoperative pain and edema control as well as analgesic consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to show any difference in effectiveness between the two most common pain management modalities, or between those modalities and the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective observational study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7468014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74680142020-09-15 A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Kara, Yavuz Selim Hapa, Onur Işın, Yağmur Kılıç, Ali İhsan Havitçioğlu, Hasan J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain and edema are the most common problems associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare ice wrap and subacromial injection (SI) as treatments for early postop pain and edema control and to contrast them with a control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized into three groups: 23 patients who received an ice wrap, 20 patients who received a SI, and a control group of 16 patients. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, tear retraction, degree of fatty muscle degeneration, surgical procedures, and amount of irrigation fluid were similar for the three groups, which also showed similar results regarding postoperative pain and edema control as well as analgesic consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to show any difference in effectiveness between the two most common pain management modalities, or between those modalities and the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective observational study. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-02 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7468014/ /pubmed/32876791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00556-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kara, Yavuz Selim Hapa, Onur Işın, Yağmur Kılıç, Ali İhsan Havitçioğlu, Hasan A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
title | A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
title_full | A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
title_fullStr | A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
title_short | A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
title_sort | comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00556-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karayavuzselim acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT hapaonur acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT isınyagmur acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT kılıcaliihsan acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT havitciogluhasan acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT karayavuzselim comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT hapaonur comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT isınyagmur comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT kılıcaliihsan comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair AT havitciogluhasan comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair |