Cargando…

A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain and edema are the most common problems associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare ice wrap and subacromial injection (SI) as treatments for early postop pain and edema control and to contrast them with a control gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kara, Yavuz Selim, Hapa, Onur, Işın, Yağmur, Kılıç, Ali İhsan, Havitçioğlu, Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00556-6
_version_ 1783578132006043648
author Kara, Yavuz Selim
Hapa, Onur
Işın, Yağmur
Kılıç, Ali İhsan
Havitçioğlu, Hasan
author_facet Kara, Yavuz Selim
Hapa, Onur
Işın, Yağmur
Kılıç, Ali İhsan
Havitçioğlu, Hasan
author_sort Kara, Yavuz Selim
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain and edema are the most common problems associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare ice wrap and subacromial injection (SI) as treatments for early postop pain and edema control and to contrast them with a control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized into three groups: 23 patients who received an ice wrap, 20 patients who received a SI, and a control group of 16 patients. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, tear retraction, degree of fatty muscle degeneration, surgical procedures, and amount of irrigation fluid were similar for the three groups, which also showed similar results regarding postoperative pain and edema control as well as analgesic consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to show any difference in effectiveness between the two most common pain management modalities, or between those modalities and the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective observational study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7468014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74680142020-09-15 A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair Kara, Yavuz Selim Hapa, Onur Işın, Yağmur Kılıç, Ali İhsan Havitçioğlu, Hasan J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain and edema are the most common problems associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The purpose of the present study was to compare ice wrap and subacromial injection (SI) as treatments for early postop pain and edema control and to contrast them with a control group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 59 patients treated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were randomized into three groups: 23 patients who received an ice wrap, 20 patients who received a SI, and a control group of 16 patients. RESULTS: Patient demographics, comorbidities, tear retraction, degree of fatty muscle degeneration, surgical procedures, and amount of irrigation fluid were similar for the three groups, which also showed similar results regarding postoperative pain and edema control as well as analgesic consumption. CONCLUSIONS: The present study failed to show any difference in effectiveness between the two most common pain management modalities, or between those modalities and the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, prospective observational study. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-02 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7468014/ /pubmed/32876791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00556-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kara, Yavuz Selim
Hapa, Onur
Işın, Yağmur
Kılıç, Ali İhsan
Havitçioğlu, Hasan
A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
title A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
title_full A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
title_fullStr A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
title_short A comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
title_sort comparison of ice wrap and subacromial injection for postoperative pain and edema control following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32876791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10195-020-00556-6
work_keys_str_mv AT karayavuzselim acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT hapaonur acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT isınyagmur acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT kılıcaliihsan acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT havitciogluhasan acomparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT karayavuzselim comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT hapaonur comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT isınyagmur comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT kılıcaliihsan comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair
AT havitciogluhasan comparisonoficewrapandsubacromialinjectionforpostoperativepainandedemacontrolfollowingarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair