Cargando…
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Objectives: Secondary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the head and neck is occasionally observed in childhood cancer survivors. The goal of this research was to compare the demographic and pathologic characteristics, as well as survival between primary and secondary MEC in children and adolescent...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00473 |
_version_ | 1783578229772124160 |
---|---|
author | Hao, Li Shi, Caixiao Xu, Ying |
author_facet | Hao, Li Shi, Caixiao Xu, Ying |
author_sort | Hao, Li |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Secondary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the head and neck is occasionally observed in childhood cancer survivors. The goal of this research was to compare the demographic and pathologic characteristics, as well as survival between primary and secondary MEC in children and adolescent patients. Methods: Pediatric patients (younger than 19 years old) with surgically treated MEC of the head and neck were retrospectively enrolled at the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Zhengzhou University and divided into two groups based on their cancer history. Demographic, pathologic, and survival characteristics between the two groups were compared. The main study interests were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: The primary and secondary groups consisted of 63 and 15 patients, respectively. The two groups had similar distributions in terms of age, sex, tumor stage, neck lymph node stage, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, p53, Bcl-2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, and Ki-67 index. The 10-year RFS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 80 and 71%, respectively, and this difference was not significant (p = 0.464). The 10-year DSS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 83 and 82%, respectively, and this difference was also not significant (p = 0.649). The 10-year OS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 74 and 51%, respectively; this difference was significant (p = 0.023). Further Cox model analysis confirmed the independence of a previous cancer history (p = 0.043) in decreasing OS. Conclusions: Pediatric patients with secondary MEC exhibit similar demographic, pathologic, and molecular characteristics as primary patients but worse OS. These findings indicate that special disease management approaches might be needed for secondary patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7468489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74684892020-09-23 Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck Hao, Li Shi, Caixiao Xu, Ying Front Pediatr Pediatrics Objectives: Secondary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) of the head and neck is occasionally observed in childhood cancer survivors. The goal of this research was to compare the demographic and pathologic characteristics, as well as survival between primary and secondary MEC in children and adolescent patients. Methods: Pediatric patients (younger than 19 years old) with surgically treated MEC of the head and neck were retrospectively enrolled at the Affiliated Children's Hospital of Zhengzhou University and divided into two groups based on their cancer history. Demographic, pathologic, and survival characteristics between the two groups were compared. The main study interests were recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS). Results: The primary and secondary groups consisted of 63 and 15 patients, respectively. The two groups had similar distributions in terms of age, sex, tumor stage, neck lymph node stage, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, p53, Bcl-2, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, and Ki-67 index. The 10-year RFS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 80 and 71%, respectively, and this difference was not significant (p = 0.464). The 10-year DSS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 83 and 82%, respectively, and this difference was also not significant (p = 0.649). The 10-year OS rates for the primary group and secondary group were 74 and 51%, respectively; this difference was significant (p = 0.023). Further Cox model analysis confirmed the independence of a previous cancer history (p = 0.043) in decreasing OS. Conclusions: Pediatric patients with secondary MEC exhibit similar demographic, pathologic, and molecular characteristics as primary patients but worse OS. These findings indicate that special disease management approaches might be needed for secondary patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7468489/ /pubmed/32974245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00473 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hao, Shi and Xu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pediatrics Hao, Li Shi, Caixiao Xu, Ying Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck |
title | Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck |
title_full | Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck |
title_fullStr | Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck |
title_short | Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Pediatric Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Head and Neck |
title_sort | comparison between primary and secondary pediatric mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the head and neck |
topic | Pediatrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7468489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00473 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haoli comparisonbetweenprimaryandsecondarypediatricmucoepidermoidcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT shicaixiao comparisonbetweenprimaryandsecondarypediatricmucoepidermoidcarcinomaoftheheadandneck AT xuying comparisonbetweenprimaryandsecondarypediatricmucoepidermoidcarcinomaoftheheadandneck |