Cargando…

Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly that needs surgical management for repositioning intestines into the abdominal cavity and for abdominal closure. Higher hospital or surgeon volume has previously been found to be associated with better clinical outcomes for different especially high-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morche, Johannes, Mathes, Tim, Jacobs, Anja, Wessel, Lucas, Neugebauer, Edmund A. M., Pieper, Dawid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01462-y
_version_ 1783578356317421568
author Morche, Johannes
Mathes, Tim
Jacobs, Anja
Wessel, Lucas
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Pieper, Dawid
author_facet Morche, Johannes
Mathes, Tim
Jacobs, Anja
Wessel, Lucas
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Pieper, Dawid
author_sort Morche, Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly that needs surgical management for repositioning intestines into the abdominal cavity and for abdominal closure. Higher hospital or surgeon volume has previously been found to be associated with better clinical outcomes for different especially high-risk, low volume procedures. Therefore, we aim to examine the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for gastroschisis. METHODS: We will perform a systematic literature search from inception onwards in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Biosis Previews without applying any limitations. In addition, we will search trial registries and relevant conference proceedings. We will include (cluster-) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective cohort studies analyzing the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and clinical outcomes. The primary outcomes will be survival and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be different measures of morbidity (e.g., severe gastrointestinal complications, gastrointestinal dysfunctions, and sepsis), quality of life, and length of stay. We will systematically assess risk of bias of included studies using RoB 2 for individually or cluster-randomized trials and ROBINS-I for cohort studies, and extract data on the study design, patient characteristics, case-mix adjustments, statistical methods, hospital and surgeon volume, and outcomes into standardized tables. Title and abstract screening, full text screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction of results will be conducted by two reviewers independently. Other data will be extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second one. Any disagreements will be resolved by discussion. We will not pool results statistically as we expect included studies to be clinically and methodologically very diverse. We will conduct a systematic synthesis without meta-analysis and use GRADE for assessing the certainty of the evidence. DISCUSSION: Given the lack of a comprehensive summary of findings on the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for gastroschisis, this systematic review will put things right. Results can be used to inform decision makers or clinicians and to adapt medical care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EX34M; 10.17605/OSF.IO/HGPZ2)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7469094
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74690942020-09-03 Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol Morche, Johannes Mathes, Tim Jacobs, Anja Wessel, Lucas Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. Pieper, Dawid Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis is a congenital anomaly that needs surgical management for repositioning intestines into the abdominal cavity and for abdominal closure. Higher hospital or surgeon volume has previously been found to be associated with better clinical outcomes for different especially high-risk, low volume procedures. Therefore, we aim to examine the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for gastroschisis. METHODS: We will perform a systematic literature search from inception onwards in Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and Biosis Previews without applying any limitations. In addition, we will search trial registries and relevant conference proceedings. We will include (cluster-) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective or retrospective cohort studies analyzing the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and clinical outcomes. The primary outcomes will be survival and mortality. Secondary outcomes will be different measures of morbidity (e.g., severe gastrointestinal complications, gastrointestinal dysfunctions, and sepsis), quality of life, and length of stay. We will systematically assess risk of bias of included studies using RoB 2 for individually or cluster-randomized trials and ROBINS-I for cohort studies, and extract data on the study design, patient characteristics, case-mix adjustments, statistical methods, hospital and surgeon volume, and outcomes into standardized tables. Title and abstract screening, full text screening, critical appraisal, and data extraction of results will be conducted by two reviewers independently. Other data will be extracted by one reviewer and checked for accuracy by a second one. Any disagreements will be resolved by discussion. We will not pool results statistically as we expect included studies to be clinically and methodologically very diverse. We will conduct a systematic synthesis without meta-analysis and use GRADE for assessing the certainty of the evidence. DISCUSSION: Given the lack of a comprehensive summary of findings on the relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes for gastroschisis, this systematic review will put things right. Results can be used to inform decision makers or clinicians and to adapt medical care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/EX34M; 10.17605/OSF.IO/HGPZ2) BioMed Central 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7469094/ /pubmed/32878649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01462-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Morche, Johannes
Mathes, Tim
Jacobs, Anja
Wessel, Lucas
Neugebauer, Edmund A. M.
Pieper, Dawid
Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
title Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
title_full Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
title_short Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
title_sort relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469094/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01462-y
work_keys_str_mv AT morchejohannes relationshipbetweenvolumeandoutcomeforgastroschisisasystematicreviewprotocol
AT mathestim relationshipbetweenvolumeandoutcomeforgastroschisisasystematicreviewprotocol
AT jacobsanja relationshipbetweenvolumeandoutcomeforgastroschisisasystematicreviewprotocol
AT wessellucas relationshipbetweenvolumeandoutcomeforgastroschisisasystematicreviewprotocol
AT neugebaueredmundam relationshipbetweenvolumeandoutcomeforgastroschisisasystematicreviewprotocol
AT pieperdawid relationshipbetweenvolumeandoutcomeforgastroschisisasystematicreviewprotocol