Cargando…

Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, collectively referred to as the SNAP risk factors. Due to the high prevalence, co-occurrence and possible...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollis, Jenna L., Doherty, Emma, Dray, Julia, Tremain, Danika, Hunter, Mandy, Takats, Karen, Williams, Christopher M., Murray, Henry, Pennell, Craig E., Tully, Belinda, Wiggers, John, Daly, Justine B., Kingsland, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01453-z
_version_ 1783578391012704256
author Hollis, Jenna L.
Doherty, Emma
Dray, Julia
Tremain, Danika
Hunter, Mandy
Takats, Karen
Williams, Christopher M.
Murray, Henry
Pennell, Craig E.
Tully, Belinda
Wiggers, John
Daly, Justine B.
Kingsland, Melanie
author_facet Hollis, Jenna L.
Doherty, Emma
Dray, Julia
Tremain, Danika
Hunter, Mandy
Takats, Karen
Williams, Christopher M.
Murray, Henry
Pennell, Craig E.
Tully, Belinda
Wiggers, John
Daly, Justine B.
Kingsland, Melanie
author_sort Hollis, Jenna L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, collectively referred to as the SNAP risk factors. Due to the high prevalence, co-occurrence and possible interactive health effects of such health behaviours in pregnancy, antenatal interventions that support pregnant women to improve multiple SNAP behaviours have a greater potential impact on the health outcomes of women and their children than interventions addressing single behaviours. The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered as part of antenatal care that aim to improve multiple SNAP behaviours among pregnant women. METHODS: Seven electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible studies. Eligible studies will include those where pregnant women are attending antenatal care. Studies that examine the effect of an intervention that addresses multiple SNAP behaviours (≥ 2 behaviours) during pregnancy and are delivered or instigated through antenatal care in a healthcare service will be included. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RCTs, cluster RCTs, stepped-wedge RCTs and non-randomised control trials will be eligible. Studies that include a no-intervention control, wait-list control group, standard/usual care, or another active single behavioural intervention (e.g. addressing one behaviour only) will be considered. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer if required. A random effects model will be used to synthesise the results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarising effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form. DISCUSSION: The review will synthesise the evidence on the effect of interventions that address multiple SNAP behaviours in antenatal care and will help researchers, policy-makers and health services to develop and deliver best practice integrated models of antenatal care that have the potential to impact on both the short- and long-term health outcomes for women and their children. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018095315
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7469269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74692692020-09-03 Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol Hollis, Jenna L. Doherty, Emma Dray, Julia Tremain, Danika Hunter, Mandy Takats, Karen Williams, Christopher M. Murray, Henry Pennell, Craig E. Tully, Belinda Wiggers, John Daly, Justine B. Kingsland, Melanie Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Maternal behaviours in pregnancy associated with adverse pregnancy, birth and health outcomes include tobacco smoking, poor nutrition, alcohol consumption and low physical activity, collectively referred to as the SNAP risk factors. Due to the high prevalence, co-occurrence and possible interactive health effects of such health behaviours in pregnancy, antenatal interventions that support pregnant women to improve multiple SNAP behaviours have a greater potential impact on the health outcomes of women and their children than interventions addressing single behaviours. The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of interventions delivered as part of antenatal care that aim to improve multiple SNAP behaviours among pregnant women. METHODS: Seven electronic databases will be searched for potentially eligible studies. Eligible studies will include those where pregnant women are attending antenatal care. Studies that examine the effect of an intervention that addresses multiple SNAP behaviours (≥ 2 behaviours) during pregnancy and are delivered or instigated through antenatal care in a healthcare service will be included. Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs), RCTs, cluster RCTs, stepped-wedge RCTs and non-randomised control trials will be eligible. Studies that include a no-intervention control, wait-list control group, standard/usual care, or another active single behavioural intervention (e.g. addressing one behaviour only) will be considered. Two independent reviewers will conduct study screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or a third reviewer if required. A random effects model will be used to synthesise the results. Alternative synthesis methods will be investigated in instances where a meta-analysis is not appropriate, such as summarising effect estimates, combining P values, vote counting based on direction of effect, or synthesis in narrative form. DISCUSSION: The review will synthesise the evidence on the effect of interventions that address multiple SNAP behaviours in antenatal care and will help researchers, policy-makers and health services to develop and deliver best practice integrated models of antenatal care that have the potential to impact on both the short- and long-term health outcomes for women and their children. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42018095315 BioMed Central 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7469269/ /pubmed/32878647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01453-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Protocol
Hollis, Jenna L.
Doherty, Emma
Dray, Julia
Tremain, Danika
Hunter, Mandy
Takats, Karen
Williams, Christopher M.
Murray, Henry
Pennell, Craig E.
Tully, Belinda
Wiggers, John
Daly, Justine B.
Kingsland, Melanie
Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
title Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
title_full Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
title_fullStr Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
title_short Are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? A systematic review protocol
title_sort are antenatal interventions effective in improving multiple health behaviours among pregnant women? a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32878647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01453-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hollisjennal areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT dohertyemma areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT drayjulia areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tremaindanika areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT huntermandy areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT takatskaren areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT williamschristopherm areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT murrayhenry areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT pennellcraige areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tullybelinda areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT wiggersjohn areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT dalyjustineb areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol
AT kingslandmelanie areantenatalinterventionseffectiveinimprovingmultiplehealthbehavioursamongpregnantwomenasystematicreviewprotocol