Cargando…
South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation
BACKGROUND: Whenever South African (SA) research institutions share human biological material and associated data for health research or clinical trials they are legally compelled to have a material transfer agreement (MTA) in place that uses as framework the standard MTA newly gazetted by the South...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32883298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00526-x |
_version_ | 1783578403634413568 |
---|---|
author | Thaldar, Donrich W. Botes, Marietjie Nienaber, Annelize |
author_facet | Thaldar, Donrich W. Botes, Marietjie Nienaber, Annelize |
author_sort | Thaldar, Donrich W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Whenever South African (SA) research institutions share human biological material and associated data for health research or clinical trials they are legally compelled to have a material transfer agreement (MTA) in place that uses as framework the standard MTA newly gazetted by the South African Minister of Health (SA MTA). MAIN BODY: The article offers a legal analysis of the SA MTA and focuses on its substantive fit with the broader legal environment in South Africa, and the clarity and practicality of its terms. The following problematic aspects of the SA MTA are highlighted: (a) Where only data and no human biological material are transferred, the SA MTA does not apply, leaving a lacuna; (b) Health Research Ethics Committees are required to be parties to a MTA despite it being outside their legal mandate and undermining their oversight function; (c) the SA MTA’s consent provisions are not aligned with extant law; and, similarly, (d) its provision on donor ownership is misaligned with extant law; (e) its creation of fictitious performance can only cause frustration on the part of an injured party; (f) its benefit-sharing provision is vague and will have little practical effect; (g) its dispute-resolution provisions fail to adequately protect South African research institutions and research participants; (h) it fails to provide substantive guidance regarding intellectual property as its provisions relating to intellectual property may cause practical problems; and, finally, (i) its data privacy provision is insufficiently specific, is overbroad, and fails to provide terms that in general would facilitate the international sharing of human biological material and associated data in terms of existing privacy law. CONCLUSIONS: While some of the problematic aspects of the SA MTA are intricate and require consultative processes with stakeholders and others, to develop comprehensive solutions, most of the problematic aspects can be resolved immediately through amendments by the South African Minister of Health. The formulation of such amendments is proposed and, where possible, interim measures are suggested that may ameliorate the problems presented by the SA MTA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7469330 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74693302020-09-03 South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation Thaldar, Donrich W. Botes, Marietjie Nienaber, Annelize BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Whenever South African (SA) research institutions share human biological material and associated data for health research or clinical trials they are legally compelled to have a material transfer agreement (MTA) in place that uses as framework the standard MTA newly gazetted by the South African Minister of Health (SA MTA). MAIN BODY: The article offers a legal analysis of the SA MTA and focuses on its substantive fit with the broader legal environment in South Africa, and the clarity and practicality of its terms. The following problematic aspects of the SA MTA are highlighted: (a) Where only data and no human biological material are transferred, the SA MTA does not apply, leaving a lacuna; (b) Health Research Ethics Committees are required to be parties to a MTA despite it being outside their legal mandate and undermining their oversight function; (c) the SA MTA’s consent provisions are not aligned with extant law; and, similarly, (d) its provision on donor ownership is misaligned with extant law; (e) its creation of fictitious performance can only cause frustration on the part of an injured party; (f) its benefit-sharing provision is vague and will have little practical effect; (g) its dispute-resolution provisions fail to adequately protect South African research institutions and research participants; (h) it fails to provide substantive guidance regarding intellectual property as its provisions relating to intellectual property may cause practical problems; and, finally, (i) its data privacy provision is insufficiently specific, is overbroad, and fails to provide terms that in general would facilitate the international sharing of human biological material and associated data in terms of existing privacy law. CONCLUSIONS: While some of the problematic aspects of the SA MTA are intricate and require consultative processes with stakeholders and others, to develop comprehensive solutions, most of the problematic aspects can be resolved immediately through amendments by the South African Minister of Health. The formulation of such amendments is proposed and, where possible, interim measures are suggested that may ameliorate the problems presented by the SA MTA. BioMed Central 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7469330/ /pubmed/32883298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00526-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Debate Thaldar, Donrich W. Botes, Marietjie Nienaber, Annelize South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
title | South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
title_full | South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
title_fullStr | South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
title_full_unstemmed | South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
title_short | South Africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
title_sort | south africa’s new standard material transfer agreement: proposals for improvement and pointers for implementation |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469330/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32883298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00526-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thaldardonrichw southafricasnewstandardmaterialtransferagreementproposalsforimprovementandpointersforimplementation AT botesmarietjie southafricasnewstandardmaterialtransferagreementproposalsforimprovementandpointersforimplementation AT nienaberannelize southafricasnewstandardmaterialtransferagreementproposalsforimprovementandpointersforimplementation |