Cargando…
Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520937039 |
_version_ | 1783578449420484608 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Marion F Birchall, Sheila Cobley, Christine Condon, Laura Fisher, Rebecca Fletcher-Smith, Joanna Golding-Day, Miriam R Greensmith, Christopher Kontou, Eirini Matias, Oliver Sprigg, Nikola Thomas, Shirley A Whitehead, Phillip J |
author_facet | Walker, Marion F Birchall, Sheila Cobley, Christine Condon, Laura Fisher, Rebecca Fletcher-Smith, Joanna Golding-Day, Miriam R Greensmith, Christopher Kontou, Eirini Matias, Oliver Sprigg, Nikola Thomas, Shirley A Whitehead, Phillip J |
author_sort | Walker, Marion F |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group or one-to-one format. SUBJECTS: Carers and stroke survivors within one year of stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS: A carer targeted intervention delivered by a research psychologist in six structured two-hour sessions or usual care control. The intervention combined education about the biological, psychological and social effects of stroke with strategies and techniques focussing on adjustment to stroke and caregiving. Stroke survivors in both groups received baseline and follow-up assessment but no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME: Recruitment rate, study attrition, fidelity of intervention delivery, acceptability and sensitivity of outcome measures used (health related quality of life, anxiety and depression and carer burden six months after randomisation). RESULTS: Of the 257 carers approached, 41 consented. Six withdrew before randomisation. Eighteen participants were randomised to receive the intervention and 17 to usual care. Attendance at sessions was greater when treated one-to-one. Feedback interviews suggested that participants found the intervention acceptable and peer support particularly helpful in normalising their feelings. Thirty participants were assessed at follow-up with improvements from baseline on all health measures for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to carers and can be delivered in group and one-to-one formats. Timing of approach and mode of intervention delivery is critical and requires tailoring to the carers individual needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7469713 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74697132020-09-16 Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study Walker, Marion F Birchall, Sheila Cobley, Christine Condon, Laura Fisher, Rebecca Fletcher-Smith, Joanna Golding-Day, Miriam R Greensmith, Christopher Kontou, Eirini Matias, Oliver Sprigg, Nikola Thomas, Shirley A Whitehead, Phillip J Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group or one-to-one format. SUBJECTS: Carers and stroke survivors within one year of stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS: A carer targeted intervention delivered by a research psychologist in six structured two-hour sessions or usual care control. The intervention combined education about the biological, psychological and social effects of stroke with strategies and techniques focussing on adjustment to stroke and caregiving. Stroke survivors in both groups received baseline and follow-up assessment but no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME: Recruitment rate, study attrition, fidelity of intervention delivery, acceptability and sensitivity of outcome measures used (health related quality of life, anxiety and depression and carer burden six months after randomisation). RESULTS: Of the 257 carers approached, 41 consented. Six withdrew before randomisation. Eighteen participants were randomised to receive the intervention and 17 to usual care. Attendance at sessions was greater when treated one-to-one. Feedback interviews suggested that participants found the intervention acceptable and peer support particularly helpful in normalising their feelings. Thirty participants were assessed at follow-up with improvements from baseline on all health measures for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to carers and can be delivered in group and one-to-one formats. Timing of approach and mode of intervention delivery is critical and requires tailoring to the carers individual needs. SAGE Publications 2020-06-21 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7469713/ /pubmed/32567356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520937039 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Evaluative Studies Walker, Marion F Birchall, Sheila Cobley, Christine Condon, Laura Fisher, Rebecca Fletcher-Smith, Joanna Golding-Day, Miriam R Greensmith, Christopher Kontou, Eirini Matias, Oliver Sprigg, Nikola Thomas, Shirley A Whitehead, Phillip J Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
title | Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
title_full | Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr | Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
title_short | Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
title_sort | biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (bisc): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study |
topic | Evaluative Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520937039 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkermarionf biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT birchallsheila biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT cobleychristine biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT condonlaura biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT fisherrebecca biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT fletchersmithjoanna biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT goldingdaymiriamr biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT greensmithchristopher biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT kontoueirini biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT matiasoliver biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT spriggnikola biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT thomasshirleya biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy AT whiteheadphillipj biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy |