Cargando…

Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Marion F, Birchall, Sheila, Cobley, Christine, Condon, Laura, Fisher, Rebecca, Fletcher-Smith, Joanna, Golding-Day, Miriam R, Greensmith, Christopher, Kontou, Eirini, Matias, Oliver, Sprigg, Nikola, Thomas, Shirley A, Whitehead, Phillip J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520937039
_version_ 1783578449420484608
author Walker, Marion F
Birchall, Sheila
Cobley, Christine
Condon, Laura
Fisher, Rebecca
Fletcher-Smith, Joanna
Golding-Day, Miriam R
Greensmith, Christopher
Kontou, Eirini
Matias, Oliver
Sprigg, Nikola
Thomas, Shirley A
Whitehead, Phillip J
author_facet Walker, Marion F
Birchall, Sheila
Cobley, Christine
Condon, Laura
Fisher, Rebecca
Fletcher-Smith, Joanna
Golding-Day, Miriam R
Greensmith, Christopher
Kontou, Eirini
Matias, Oliver
Sprigg, Nikola
Thomas, Shirley A
Whitehead, Phillip J
author_sort Walker, Marion F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group or one-to-one format. SUBJECTS: Carers and stroke survivors within one year of stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS: A carer targeted intervention delivered by a research psychologist in six structured two-hour sessions or usual care control. The intervention combined education about the biological, psychological and social effects of stroke with strategies and techniques focussing on adjustment to stroke and caregiving. Stroke survivors in both groups received baseline and follow-up assessment but no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME: Recruitment rate, study attrition, fidelity of intervention delivery, acceptability and sensitivity of outcome measures used (health related quality of life, anxiety and depression and carer burden six months after randomisation). RESULTS: Of the 257 carers approached, 41 consented. Six withdrew before randomisation. Eighteen participants were randomised to receive the intervention and 17 to usual care. Attendance at sessions was greater when treated one-to-one. Feedback interviews suggested that participants found the intervention acceptable and peer support particularly helpful in normalising their feelings. Thirty participants were assessed at follow-up with improvements from baseline on all health measures for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to carers and can be delivered in group and one-to-one formats. Timing of approach and mode of intervention delivery is critical and requires tailoring to the carers individual needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7469713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74697132020-09-16 Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study Walker, Marion F Birchall, Sheila Cobley, Christine Condon, Laura Fisher, Rebecca Fletcher-Smith, Joanna Golding-Day, Miriam R Greensmith, Christopher Kontou, Eirini Matias, Oliver Sprigg, Nikola Thomas, Shirley A Whitehead, Phillip J Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of recruiting to and delivering a biopsychosocial intervention for carers of stroke survivors. DESIGN: Feasibility randomised controlled study with nested qualitative interview study. SETTING: The intervention was delivered in the community in either a group or one-to-one format. SUBJECTS: Carers and stroke survivors within one year of stroke onset. INTERVENTIONS: A carer targeted intervention delivered by a research psychologist in six structured two-hour sessions or usual care control. The intervention combined education about the biological, psychological and social effects of stroke with strategies and techniques focussing on adjustment to stroke and caregiving. Stroke survivors in both groups received baseline and follow-up assessment but no intervention. MAIN OUTCOME: Recruitment rate, study attrition, fidelity of intervention delivery, acceptability and sensitivity of outcome measures used (health related quality of life, anxiety and depression and carer burden six months after randomisation). RESULTS: Of the 257 carers approached, 41 consented. Six withdrew before randomisation. Eighteen participants were randomised to receive the intervention and 17 to usual care. Attendance at sessions was greater when treated one-to-one. Feedback interviews suggested that participants found the intervention acceptable and peer support particularly helpful in normalising their feelings. Thirty participants were assessed at follow-up with improvements from baseline on all health measures for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to carers and can be delivered in group and one-to-one formats. Timing of approach and mode of intervention delivery is critical and requires tailoring to the carers individual needs. SAGE Publications 2020-06-21 2020-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7469713/ /pubmed/32567356 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520937039 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Evaluative Studies
Walker, Marion F
Birchall, Sheila
Cobley, Christine
Condon, Laura
Fisher, Rebecca
Fletcher-Smith, Joanna
Golding-Day, Miriam R
Greensmith, Christopher
Kontou, Eirini
Matias, Oliver
Sprigg, Nikola
Thomas, Shirley A
Whitehead, Phillip J
Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
title Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
title_full Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
title_short Biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (BISC): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
title_sort biopsychosocial intervention for stroke carers (bisc): results of a feasibility randomised controlled trial and nested qualitative interview study
topic Evaluative Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32567356
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215520937039
work_keys_str_mv AT walkermarionf biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT birchallsheila biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT cobleychristine biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT condonlaura biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT fisherrebecca biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT fletchersmithjoanna biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT goldingdaymiriamr biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT greensmithchristopher biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT kontoueirini biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT matiasoliver biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT spriggnikola biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT thomasshirleya biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT whiteheadphillipj biopsychosocialinterventionforstrokecarersbiscresultsofafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrialandnestedqualitativeinterviewstudy