Cargando…

The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network

Previous studies have shown age‐related impairments in the ability to suppress salient distractors. One possibility is that this is mediated by age‐related impairments in the recruitment of the left intraparietal sulcus (Left IPS), which has been shown to mediate the suppression of salient distracto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashinoff, Brandon K., Mayhew, Stephen D., Mevorach, Carmel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25097
_version_ 1783578468263395328
author Ashinoff, Brandon K.
Mayhew, Stephen D.
Mevorach, Carmel
author_facet Ashinoff, Brandon K.
Mayhew, Stephen D.
Mevorach, Carmel
author_sort Ashinoff, Brandon K.
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have shown age‐related impairments in the ability to suppress salient distractors. One possibility is that this is mediated by age‐related impairments in the recruitment of the left intraparietal sulcus (Left IPS), which has been shown to mediate the suppression of salient distractors in healthy, young participants. Alternatively, this effect may be due to a shift in engagement from proactive control to reactive control, possibly to compensate for age‐related impairments in proactive control. Another possibility is that this is due to changes in the functional specificity of brain regions that mediate salience suppression, expressed in changes in spontaneous connectivity of these regions. We assessed these possibilities by having participants engage in a proactive distractor suppression task while in an fMRI scanner. Although we did not find any age‐related differences in behavior, the young (N = 15) and older (N = 15) cohorts engaged qualitatively distinctive brain networks to complete the task. Younger participants engaged the predicted proactive control network, including the Left IPS. On the other hand, older participants simultaneously engaged both a proactive and a reactive network, but this was not a consequence of reduced network specificity as resting state functional connectivity was largely comparable in both age groups. Furthermore, improved behavioral performance for older adults was associated with increased resting state functional connectivity between these two networks. Overall, the results of this study suggest that age‐related differences in the recruitment of a left lateralized ventral fronto‐parietal network likely reflect the specific recruitment of reactive control mechanisms for distractor inhibition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7469802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74698022020-09-09 The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network Ashinoff, Brandon K. Mayhew, Stephen D. Mevorach, Carmel Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Previous studies have shown age‐related impairments in the ability to suppress salient distractors. One possibility is that this is mediated by age‐related impairments in the recruitment of the left intraparietal sulcus (Left IPS), which has been shown to mediate the suppression of salient distractors in healthy, young participants. Alternatively, this effect may be due to a shift in engagement from proactive control to reactive control, possibly to compensate for age‐related impairments in proactive control. Another possibility is that this is due to changes in the functional specificity of brain regions that mediate salience suppression, expressed in changes in spontaneous connectivity of these regions. We assessed these possibilities by having participants engage in a proactive distractor suppression task while in an fMRI scanner. Although we did not find any age‐related differences in behavior, the young (N = 15) and older (N = 15) cohorts engaged qualitatively distinctive brain networks to complete the task. Younger participants engaged the predicted proactive control network, including the Left IPS. On the other hand, older participants simultaneously engaged both a proactive and a reactive network, but this was not a consequence of reduced network specificity as resting state functional connectivity was largely comparable in both age groups. Furthermore, improved behavioral performance for older adults was associated with increased resting state functional connectivity between these two networks. Overall, the results of this study suggest that age‐related differences in the recruitment of a left lateralized ventral fronto‐parietal network likely reflect the specific recruitment of reactive control mechanisms for distractor inhibition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7469802/ /pubmed/32573907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25097 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Ashinoff, Brandon K.
Mayhew, Stephen D.
Mevorach, Carmel
The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
title The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
title_full The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
title_fullStr The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
title_full_unstemmed The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
title_short The same, but different: Preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
title_sort same, but different: preserved distractor suppression in old age is implemented through an age‐specific reactive ventral fronto‐parietal network
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32573907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25097
work_keys_str_mv AT ashinoffbrandonk thesamebutdifferentpreserveddistractorsuppressioninoldageisimplementedthroughanagespecificreactiveventralfrontoparietalnetwork
AT mayhewstephend thesamebutdifferentpreserveddistractorsuppressioninoldageisimplementedthroughanagespecificreactiveventralfrontoparietalnetwork
AT mevorachcarmel thesamebutdifferentpreserveddistractorsuppressioninoldageisimplementedthroughanagespecificreactiveventralfrontoparietalnetwork
AT ashinoffbrandonk samebutdifferentpreserveddistractorsuppressioninoldageisimplementedthroughanagespecificreactiveventralfrontoparietalnetwork
AT mayhewstephend samebutdifferentpreserveddistractorsuppressioninoldageisimplementedthroughanagespecificreactiveventralfrontoparietalnetwork
AT mevorachcarmel samebutdifferentpreserveddistractorsuppressioninoldageisimplementedthroughanagespecificreactiveventralfrontoparietalnetwork