Cargando…

Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention

Event‐related potentials (ERPs) are used extensively to investigate the neural mechanisms of attention control and selection. The univariate ERP approach, however, has left important questions inadequately answered. We addressed two questions by applying multivariate pattern classification to multic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Xiangfei, Bo, Ke, Meyyappan, Sreenivasan, Tong, Shanbao, Ding, Mingzhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25094
_version_ 1783578481984012288
author Hong, Xiangfei
Bo, Ke
Meyyappan, Sreenivasan
Tong, Shanbao
Ding, Mingzhou
author_facet Hong, Xiangfei
Bo, Ke
Meyyappan, Sreenivasan
Tong, Shanbao
Ding, Mingzhou
author_sort Hong, Xiangfei
collection PubMed
description Event‐related potentials (ERPs) are used extensively to investigate the neural mechanisms of attention control and selection. The univariate ERP approach, however, has left important questions inadequately answered. We addressed two questions by applying multivariate pattern classification to multichannel ERPs in two cued visual spatial attention experiments (N = 56): (a) impact of cueing strategies (instructional vs. probabilistic) on attention control and selection and (b) neural and behavioral effects of individual differences. Following cue onset, the decoding accuracy (cue left vs. cue right) began to rise above chance level earlier and remained higher in instructional cueing (~80 ms) than in probabilistic cueing (~160 ms), suggesting that unilateral attention focus leads to earlier and more distinct formation of the attention control set. A similar temporal sequence was also found for target‐related processing (cued target vs. uncued target), suggesting earlier and stronger attention selection under instructional cueing. Across the two experiments: (a) individuals with higher cue‐related decoding accuracy showed higher magnitude of attentional modulation of target‐evoked N1 amplitude, suggesting that better formation of anticipatory attentional state leads to stronger modulation of target processing, and (b) individuals with higher target‐related decoding accuracy showed faster reaction times (or larger cueing effects), suggesting that stronger selection of task‐relevant information leads to better behavioral performance. Taken together, multichannel ERPs combined with machine learning decoding yields new insights into attention control and selection that complement the univariate ERP approach, and along with the univariate ERP approach, provides a more comprehensive methodology to the study of visual spatial attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7469865
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74698652020-09-09 Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention Hong, Xiangfei Bo, Ke Meyyappan, Sreenivasan Tong, Shanbao Ding, Mingzhou Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Event‐related potentials (ERPs) are used extensively to investigate the neural mechanisms of attention control and selection. The univariate ERP approach, however, has left important questions inadequately answered. We addressed two questions by applying multivariate pattern classification to multichannel ERPs in two cued visual spatial attention experiments (N = 56): (a) impact of cueing strategies (instructional vs. probabilistic) on attention control and selection and (b) neural and behavioral effects of individual differences. Following cue onset, the decoding accuracy (cue left vs. cue right) began to rise above chance level earlier and remained higher in instructional cueing (~80 ms) than in probabilistic cueing (~160 ms), suggesting that unilateral attention focus leads to earlier and more distinct formation of the attention control set. A similar temporal sequence was also found for target‐related processing (cued target vs. uncued target), suggesting earlier and stronger attention selection under instructional cueing. Across the two experiments: (a) individuals with higher cue‐related decoding accuracy showed higher magnitude of attentional modulation of target‐evoked N1 amplitude, suggesting that better formation of anticipatory attentional state leads to stronger modulation of target processing, and (b) individuals with higher target‐related decoding accuracy showed faster reaction times (or larger cueing effects), suggesting that stronger selection of task‐relevant information leads to better behavioral performance. Taken together, multichannel ERPs combined with machine learning decoding yields new insights into attention control and selection that complement the univariate ERP approach, and along with the univariate ERP approach, provides a more comprehensive methodology to the study of visual spatial attention. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7469865/ /pubmed/32542852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25094 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hong, Xiangfei
Bo, Ke
Meyyappan, Sreenivasan
Tong, Shanbao
Ding, Mingzhou
Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
title Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
title_full Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
title_fullStr Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
title_full_unstemmed Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
title_short Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
title_sort decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469865/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32542852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25094
work_keys_str_mv AT hongxiangfei decodingattentioncontrolandselectioninvisualspatialattention
AT boke decodingattentioncontrolandselectioninvisualspatialattention
AT meyyappansreenivasan decodingattentioncontrolandselectioninvisualspatialattention
AT tongshanbao decodingattentioncontrolandselectioninvisualspatialattention
AT dingmingzhou decodingattentioncontrolandselectioninvisualspatialattention