Cargando…

One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer

Esophagectomy with extended lymph node (LN) dissection is a standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer to prevent recurrence, but severe, potentially life-threatening postoperative complications are still important issues. Accurate diagnosis of LN metastases would enable the decision to dis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshimura, Shuntaro, Takahashi, Miwako, Aikou, Susumu, Okumura, Yasuhiro, Jinbo, Keiichi, Onoyama, Haruna, Urabe, Masayuki, Kawasaki, Koichiro, Yagi, Koichi, Nishida, Masato, Mori, Kazuhiko, Yamashita, Hiroharu, Nomura, Sachiyo, Koyama, Keitaro, Momose, Toshimitsu, Abe, Hiroyuki, Ushiku, Tetsuo, Fukayama, Masashi, Seto, Yasuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003224
_version_ 1783578482910953472
author Yoshimura, Shuntaro
Takahashi, Miwako
Aikou, Susumu
Okumura, Yasuhiro
Jinbo, Keiichi
Onoyama, Haruna
Urabe, Masayuki
Kawasaki, Koichiro
Yagi, Koichi
Nishida, Masato
Mori, Kazuhiko
Yamashita, Hiroharu
Nomura, Sachiyo
Koyama, Keitaro
Momose, Toshimitsu
Abe, Hiroyuki
Ushiku, Tetsuo
Fukayama, Masashi
Seto, Yasuyuki
author_facet Yoshimura, Shuntaro
Takahashi, Miwako
Aikou, Susumu
Okumura, Yasuhiro
Jinbo, Keiichi
Onoyama, Haruna
Urabe, Masayuki
Kawasaki, Koichiro
Yagi, Koichi
Nishida, Masato
Mori, Kazuhiko
Yamashita, Hiroharu
Nomura, Sachiyo
Koyama, Keitaro
Momose, Toshimitsu
Abe, Hiroyuki
Ushiku, Tetsuo
Fukayama, Masashi
Seto, Yasuyuki
author_sort Yoshimura, Shuntaro
collection PubMed
description Esophagectomy with extended lymph node (LN) dissection is a standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer to prevent recurrence, but severe, potentially life-threatening postoperative complications are still important issues. Accurate diagnosis of LN metastases would enable the decision to dissect or leave the LNs in regions with high risk of complications. Advancements in intraoperative gamma probe and radioactivity detectors have made intraoperative navigation surgery possible using a radiotracer as a marker. (18)F-FDG is one such candidate markers, and the diagnostic power of FDG through counting the radioactivity close to each LN should be elucidated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 patients, 1073 LNs including 38 metastatic LNs were prospectively investigated. Preoperative FDG PET was performed on the same day before esophagectomy and visually surveyed in each LN station to identify abnormal uptake. The FDG radioactivity of each individual dissected LN was measured by a well-type counter, and the pathological diagnosis was compared with LN radioactivity on a one-by-one basis and with the preoperative FDG PET findings for each LN station. RESULTS: Lymph node station-based analysis showed a sensitivity and specificity of 28.6% and 96.7%, respectively. One-by-one LN-based analysis using a cutoff value obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve showed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 78.7%, respectively, demonstrating higher accuracy compared with the use of LN weight or the shortest diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The FDG uptake by each LN is a potentially useful marker for navigation surgery in esophageal cancer and has higher accuracy than LN weight or diameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7469872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74698722020-09-16 One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer Yoshimura, Shuntaro Takahashi, Miwako Aikou, Susumu Okumura, Yasuhiro Jinbo, Keiichi Onoyama, Haruna Urabe, Masayuki Kawasaki, Koichiro Yagi, Koichi Nishida, Masato Mori, Kazuhiko Yamashita, Hiroharu Nomura, Sachiyo Koyama, Keitaro Momose, Toshimitsu Abe, Hiroyuki Ushiku, Tetsuo Fukayama, Masashi Seto, Yasuyuki Clin Nucl Med Original Articles Esophagectomy with extended lymph node (LN) dissection is a standard treatment for resectable esophageal cancer to prevent recurrence, but severe, potentially life-threatening postoperative complications are still important issues. Accurate diagnosis of LN metastases would enable the decision to dissect or leave the LNs in regions with high risk of complications. Advancements in intraoperative gamma probe and radioactivity detectors have made intraoperative navigation surgery possible using a radiotracer as a marker. (18)F-FDG is one such candidate markers, and the diagnostic power of FDG through counting the radioactivity close to each LN should be elucidated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 patients, 1073 LNs including 38 metastatic LNs were prospectively investigated. Preoperative FDG PET was performed on the same day before esophagectomy and visually surveyed in each LN station to identify abnormal uptake. The FDG radioactivity of each individual dissected LN was measured by a well-type counter, and the pathological diagnosis was compared with LN radioactivity on a one-by-one basis and with the preoperative FDG PET findings for each LN station. RESULTS: Lymph node station-based analysis showed a sensitivity and specificity of 28.6% and 96.7%, respectively. One-by-one LN-based analysis using a cutoff value obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve showed a sensitivity and specificity of 94.7% and 78.7%, respectively, demonstrating higher accuracy compared with the use of LN weight or the shortest diameter. CONCLUSIONS: The FDG uptake by each LN is a potentially useful marker for navigation surgery in esophageal cancer and has higher accuracy than LN weight or diameter. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-10 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7469872/ /pubmed/32796247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003224 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yoshimura, Shuntaro
Takahashi, Miwako
Aikou, Susumu
Okumura, Yasuhiro
Jinbo, Keiichi
Onoyama, Haruna
Urabe, Masayuki
Kawasaki, Koichiro
Yagi, Koichi
Nishida, Masato
Mori, Kazuhiko
Yamashita, Hiroharu
Nomura, Sachiyo
Koyama, Keitaro
Momose, Toshimitsu
Abe, Hiroyuki
Ushiku, Tetsuo
Fukayama, Masashi
Seto, Yasuyuki
One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer
title One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer
title_full One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer
title_fullStr One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer
title_full_unstemmed One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer
title_short One-by-One Comparison of Lymph Nodes Between (18)F-FDG Uptake and Pathological Diagnosis in Esophageal Cancer
title_sort one-by-one comparison of lymph nodes between (18)f-fdg uptake and pathological diagnosis in esophageal cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7469872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796247
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003224
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshimurashuntaro onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT takahashimiwako onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT aikoususumu onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT okumurayasuhiro onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT jinbokeiichi onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT onoyamaharuna onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT urabemasayuki onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT kawasakikoichiro onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT yagikoichi onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT nishidamasato onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT morikazuhiko onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT yamashitahiroharu onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT nomurasachiyo onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT koyamakeitaro onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT momosetoshimitsu onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT abehiroyuki onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT ushikutetsuo onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT fukayamamasashi onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer
AT setoyasuyuki onebyonecomparisonoflymphnodesbetween18ffdguptakeandpathologicaldiagnosisinesophagealcancer