Cargando…

Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore if consequent use of chest X-ray (CXR), when the physician is not sure of the diagnosis of pneumonia after clinical examination and CRP-testing, favors a more restrictive prescribing of antibiotics. DESIGN: This was an intervention study conducted bet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moberg, Anna B, Kling, Moa, Paues, Jakob, Fransson, Sven Göran, Falk, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1794404
_version_ 1783578531908812800
author Moberg, Anna B
Kling, Moa
Paues, Jakob
Fransson, Sven Göran
Falk, Magnus
author_facet Moberg, Anna B
Kling, Moa
Paues, Jakob
Fransson, Sven Göran
Falk, Magnus
author_sort Moberg, Anna B
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore if consequent use of chest X-ray (CXR), when the physician is not sure of the diagnosis of pneumonia after clinical examination and CRP-testing, favors a more restrictive prescribing of antibiotics. DESIGN: This was an intervention study conducted between September 2015 and December 2017. SETTING: Two intervention primary health care centers (PHCCs) and three control PHCCs in the southeast of Sweden. INTERVENTION: All patients were referred for CXR when the physician´s suspicion of pneumonia was ‘unsure’, or ‘quite sure’ after CRP-testing. Control units managed patients according to their usual routine after clinical examination and CRP-testing. SUBJECTS: A total of 104 patients were included in the intervention group and 81 patients in the control group. The inclusion criteria of the study were clinically suspected pneumonia in patients ≥18 years, with respiratory symptoms for more than 24 h. Main outcome measure: Antibiotic prescribing rate. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 85% were referred for CXR and 69% were prescribed antibiotics, as compared to 26% and 77% in the control group. The difference in antibiotic prescribing rate was not statistically significant, unadjusted OR 0.68 [0.35–1.3] and adjusted OR 1.1 [CI 0.43–3.0]. A total of 24% of patients with negative CXR were prescribed antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This study could not prove that use of CXR when the physician was not sure of the diagnosis of pneumonia results in lowered antibiotic prescribing rate in primary care. In cases of negative findings on CXR the physicians do not seem to rely on the outcome when it comes to antibiotic prescribing. KEY POINTS: Routine use of chest X-ray when the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia is uncertain has not been proven to result in lowered antibiotic prescribing rate. Physicians do not fully rely on chest X-ray outcome and to some extent prescribe antibiotics even if negative, when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected. Chest X-ray is already used in one out of four cases in routine primary care of pneumonia patients in Sweden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7470159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74701592020-09-15 Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study Moberg, Anna B Kling, Moa Paues, Jakob Fransson, Sven Göran Falk, Magnus Scand J Prim Health Care Research Articles OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore if consequent use of chest X-ray (CXR), when the physician is not sure of the diagnosis of pneumonia after clinical examination and CRP-testing, favors a more restrictive prescribing of antibiotics. DESIGN: This was an intervention study conducted between September 2015 and December 2017. SETTING: Two intervention primary health care centers (PHCCs) and three control PHCCs in the southeast of Sweden. INTERVENTION: All patients were referred for CXR when the physician´s suspicion of pneumonia was ‘unsure’, or ‘quite sure’ after CRP-testing. Control units managed patients according to their usual routine after clinical examination and CRP-testing. SUBJECTS: A total of 104 patients were included in the intervention group and 81 patients in the control group. The inclusion criteria of the study were clinically suspected pneumonia in patients ≥18 years, with respiratory symptoms for more than 24 h. Main outcome measure: Antibiotic prescribing rate. RESULTS: In the intervention group, 85% were referred for CXR and 69% were prescribed antibiotics, as compared to 26% and 77% in the control group. The difference in antibiotic prescribing rate was not statistically significant, unadjusted OR 0.68 [0.35–1.3] and adjusted OR 1.1 [CI 0.43–3.0]. A total of 24% of patients with negative CXR were prescribed antibiotics. CONCLUSION: This study could not prove that use of CXR when the physician was not sure of the diagnosis of pneumonia results in lowered antibiotic prescribing rate in primary care. In cases of negative findings on CXR the physicians do not seem to rely on the outcome when it comes to antibiotic prescribing. KEY POINTS: Routine use of chest X-ray when the clinical diagnosis of pneumonia is uncertain has not been proven to result in lowered antibiotic prescribing rate. Physicians do not fully rely on chest X-ray outcome and to some extent prescribe antibiotics even if negative, when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected. Chest X-ray is already used in one out of four cases in routine primary care of pneumonia patients in Sweden. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7470159/ /pubmed/32705941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1794404 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Moberg, Anna B
Kling, Moa
Paues, Jakob
Fransson, Sven Göran
Falk, Magnus
Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
title Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
title_full Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
title_fullStr Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
title_short Use of chest X-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
title_sort use of chest x-ray in the assessment of community acquired pneumonia in primary care – an intervention study
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32705941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2020.1794404
work_keys_str_mv AT mobergannab useofchestxrayintheassessmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniainprimarycareaninterventionstudy
AT klingmoa useofchestxrayintheassessmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniainprimarycareaninterventionstudy
AT pauesjakob useofchestxrayintheassessmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniainprimarycareaninterventionstudy
AT franssonsvengoran useofchestxrayintheassessmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniainprimarycareaninterventionstudy
AT falkmagnus useofchestxrayintheassessmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniainprimarycareaninterventionstudy