Cargando…

Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography

BACKGROUND: Physicians can find it challenging to decide whether confirmative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) should be performed in patients who present with “suspicious small aneurysm-like structures” on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Factors associated with “false positive aneurysms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jang, Minsu, Kim, Jang Hun, Park, Jin Woo, Roh, Haewon, Lee, Han-Joo, Seo, Junghan, Hwang, Sung Hwan, Yoon, Joon Ho, Yoon, Sang Hoon, Cho, Byung-Kyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238597
_version_ 1783578575596683264
author Jang, Minsu
Kim, Jang Hun
Park, Jin Woo
Roh, Haewon
Lee, Han-Joo
Seo, Junghan
Hwang, Sung Hwan
Yoon, Joon Ho
Yoon, Sang Hoon
Cho, Byung-Kyu
author_facet Jang, Minsu
Kim, Jang Hun
Park, Jin Woo
Roh, Haewon
Lee, Han-Joo
Seo, Junghan
Hwang, Sung Hwan
Yoon, Joon Ho
Yoon, Sang Hoon
Cho, Byung-Kyu
author_sort Jang, Minsu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physicians can find it challenging to decide whether confirmative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) should be performed in patients who present with “suspicious small aneurysm-like structures” on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Factors associated with “false positive aneurysms on MRA” (FPAMs),” which are finally confirmed as negative on DSA, have rarely been reported. This study aimed to identify the clinical or radiologic clues indicative of FPAM on DSA. METHODS: Patients who had undergone DSA between 2016 and 2019 for suspicious aneurysm-like structures < 5 mm in size on MRA were enrolled. Patient demographics and the details regarding the geometry of the structures were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the associated factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical implications. RESULTS: Of the 107 suspicious structures, 46 were indicated as being false positive on DSA (42.96%). Location (positive on C7 and negative on C5-6 ICA) and lower dome to neck ratio were found to be significant parameters in the multivariate analysis. The dome to neck ratio threshold value was 0.99. CONCLUSION: Suspicious aneurysm-like structures located not on C5-6 but on C7 ICA and having wide neck morphologies (dome to neck ratio < 0.99) are highly likely to be negative on DSA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7470380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74703802020-09-11 Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography Jang, Minsu Kim, Jang Hun Park, Jin Woo Roh, Haewon Lee, Han-Joo Seo, Junghan Hwang, Sung Hwan Yoon, Joon Ho Yoon, Sang Hoon Cho, Byung-Kyu PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Physicians can find it challenging to decide whether confirmative digital subtraction angiography (DSA) should be performed in patients who present with “suspicious small aneurysm-like structures” on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Factors associated with “false positive aneurysms on MRA” (FPAMs),” which are finally confirmed as negative on DSA, have rarely been reported. This study aimed to identify the clinical or radiologic clues indicative of FPAM on DSA. METHODS: Patients who had undergone DSA between 2016 and 2019 for suspicious aneurysm-like structures < 5 mm in size on MRA were enrolled. Patient demographics and the details regarding the geometry of the structures were retrospectively reviewed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the associated factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical implications. RESULTS: Of the 107 suspicious structures, 46 were indicated as being false positive on DSA (42.96%). Location (positive on C7 and negative on C5-6 ICA) and lower dome to neck ratio were found to be significant parameters in the multivariate analysis. The dome to neck ratio threshold value was 0.99. CONCLUSION: Suspicious aneurysm-like structures located not on C5-6 but on C7 ICA and having wide neck morphologies (dome to neck ratio < 0.99) are highly likely to be negative on DSA. Public Library of Science 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7470380/ /pubmed/32881975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238597 Text en © 2020 Jang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jang, Minsu
Kim, Jang Hun
Park, Jin Woo
Roh, Haewon
Lee, Han-Joo
Seo, Junghan
Hwang, Sung Hwan
Yoon, Joon Ho
Yoon, Sang Hoon
Cho, Byung-Kyu
Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
title Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
title_full Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
title_fullStr Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
title_full_unstemmed Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
title_short Features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
title_sort features of “false positive” unruptured intracranial aneurysms on screening magnetic resonance angiography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238597
work_keys_str_mv AT jangminsu featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT kimjanghun featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT parkjinwoo featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT rohhaewon featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT leehanjoo featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT seojunghan featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT hwangsunghwan featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT yoonjoonho featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT yoonsanghoon featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography
AT chobyungkyu featuresoffalsepositiveunrupturedintracranialaneurysmsonscreeningmagneticresonanceangiography