Cargando…

Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahn, Michael, Rekowski, Jan, Jánosi, Rolf Alexander, Kribben, Andreas, Canbay, Ali, Katsounas, Antonios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238587
_version_ 1783578577974853632
author Jahn, Michael
Rekowski, Jan
Jánosi, Rolf Alexander
Kribben, Andreas
Canbay, Ali
Katsounas, Antonios
author_facet Jahn, Michael
Rekowski, Jan
Jánosi, Rolf Alexander
Kribben, Andreas
Canbay, Ali
Katsounas, Antonios
author_sort Jahn, Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in an interdisciplinary 22-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a German university hospital. Within an 18-month period, SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 were calculated for 514 critically ill patients that were admitted to the internal medicine department. To evaluate discrimination performance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for each score, exclusively or in combination with IL-6 or PCT or CRP. DeLong test was used to compare different AUROCs. RESULTS: The SAPS 2 exhibited a better discrimination performance than SAPS 3 with AUROCs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78), respectively. Overall, combination of the SAPS 2 with IL-6 showed the best discrimination performance (AUROC 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.87), albeit not significantly different from SAPS2. IL-6 performed better than PCT and CRP with AUROCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69–0.81), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.72), respectively. Performance of the SAPS 3 improved significantly when combined with IL-6 (AUROC 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81) or PCT (AUROC 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67–0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provided evidence that the risk stratification performance of the SAPS 3 and, to a lesser degree, also of the SAPS 2 can increase when combined with IL-6. A more accurate detection of aberrant or dysregulated systemic immunological responses (by IL-6) may explain the higher performance achieved by SAPS 3 + IL-6 vs. SAPS 3. Thus, implementation of IL-6 in critical care scores can improve prediction outcomes, especially in patients experiencing acute inflammatory conditions; however, statistical results may vary across hospital types and/or patient populations with different case mix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7470390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74703902020-09-11 Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP Jahn, Michael Rekowski, Jan Jánosi, Rolf Alexander Kribben, Andreas Canbay, Ali Katsounas, Antonios PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in an interdisciplinary 22-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a German university hospital. Within an 18-month period, SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 were calculated for 514 critically ill patients that were admitted to the internal medicine department. To evaluate discrimination performance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for each score, exclusively or in combination with IL-6 or PCT or CRP. DeLong test was used to compare different AUROCs. RESULTS: The SAPS 2 exhibited a better discrimination performance than SAPS 3 with AUROCs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78), respectively. Overall, combination of the SAPS 2 with IL-6 showed the best discrimination performance (AUROC 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.87), albeit not significantly different from SAPS2. IL-6 performed better than PCT and CRP with AUROCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69–0.81), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.72), respectively. Performance of the SAPS 3 improved significantly when combined with IL-6 (AUROC 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81) or PCT (AUROC 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67–0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provided evidence that the risk stratification performance of the SAPS 3 and, to a lesser degree, also of the SAPS 2 can increase when combined with IL-6. A more accurate detection of aberrant or dysregulated systemic immunological responses (by IL-6) may explain the higher performance achieved by SAPS 3 + IL-6 vs. SAPS 3. Thus, implementation of IL-6 in critical care scores can improve prediction outcomes, especially in patients experiencing acute inflammatory conditions; however, statistical results may vary across hospital types and/or patient populations with different case mix. Public Library of Science 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7470390/ /pubmed/32881963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238587 Text en © 2020 Jahn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jahn, Michael
Rekowski, Jan
Jánosi, Rolf Alexander
Kribben, Andreas
Canbay, Ali
Katsounas, Antonios
Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
title Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
title_full Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
title_fullStr Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
title_full_unstemmed Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
title_short Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
title_sort score performance of saps 2 and saps 3 in combination with biomarkers il-6, pct or crp
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238587
work_keys_str_mv AT jahnmichael scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp
AT rekowskijan scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp
AT janosirolfalexander scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp
AT kribbenandreas scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp
AT canbayali scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp
AT katsounasantonios scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp