Cargando…
Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238587 |
_version_ | 1783578577974853632 |
---|---|
author | Jahn, Michael Rekowski, Jan Jánosi, Rolf Alexander Kribben, Andreas Canbay, Ali Katsounas, Antonios |
author_facet | Jahn, Michael Rekowski, Jan Jánosi, Rolf Alexander Kribben, Andreas Canbay, Ali Katsounas, Antonios |
author_sort | Jahn, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in an interdisciplinary 22-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a German university hospital. Within an 18-month period, SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 were calculated for 514 critically ill patients that were admitted to the internal medicine department. To evaluate discrimination performance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for each score, exclusively or in combination with IL-6 or PCT or CRP. DeLong test was used to compare different AUROCs. RESULTS: The SAPS 2 exhibited a better discrimination performance than SAPS 3 with AUROCs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78), respectively. Overall, combination of the SAPS 2 with IL-6 showed the best discrimination performance (AUROC 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.87), albeit not significantly different from SAPS2. IL-6 performed better than PCT and CRP with AUROCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69–0.81), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.72), respectively. Performance of the SAPS 3 improved significantly when combined with IL-6 (AUROC 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81) or PCT (AUROC 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67–0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provided evidence that the risk stratification performance of the SAPS 3 and, to a lesser degree, also of the SAPS 2 can increase when combined with IL-6. A more accurate detection of aberrant or dysregulated systemic immunological responses (by IL-6) may explain the higher performance achieved by SAPS 3 + IL-6 vs. SAPS 3. Thus, implementation of IL-6 in critical care scores can improve prediction outcomes, especially in patients experiencing acute inflammatory conditions; however, statistical results may vary across hospital types and/or patient populations with different case mix. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7470390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74703902020-09-11 Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP Jahn, Michael Rekowski, Jan Jánosi, Rolf Alexander Kribben, Andreas Canbay, Ali Katsounas, Antonios PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the effects of combining the Simplified-Acute-Physiology-Score (SAPS) 2 or the SAPS 3 with Interleukin-6 (IL-6) or Procalcitonin (PCT) or C-Reactive Protein (CRP) concentrations for predicting in-hospital mortality. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in an interdisciplinary 22-bed intensive care unit (ICU) at a German university hospital. Within an 18-month period, SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 were calculated for 514 critically ill patients that were admitted to the internal medicine department. To evaluate discrimination performance, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for each score, exclusively or in combination with IL-6 or PCT or CRP. DeLong test was used to compare different AUROCs. RESULTS: The SAPS 2 exhibited a better discrimination performance than SAPS 3 with AUROCs of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.78), respectively. Overall, combination of the SAPS 2 with IL-6 showed the best discrimination performance (AUROC 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.87), albeit not significantly different from SAPS2. IL-6 performed better than PCT and CRP with AUROCs of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.69–0.81), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66–0.77) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59–0.72), respectively. Performance of the SAPS 3 improved significantly when combined with IL-6 (AUROC 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69–0.81) or PCT (AUROC 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67–0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis provided evidence that the risk stratification performance of the SAPS 3 and, to a lesser degree, also of the SAPS 2 can increase when combined with IL-6. A more accurate detection of aberrant or dysregulated systemic immunological responses (by IL-6) may explain the higher performance achieved by SAPS 3 + IL-6 vs. SAPS 3. Thus, implementation of IL-6 in critical care scores can improve prediction outcomes, especially in patients experiencing acute inflammatory conditions; however, statistical results may vary across hospital types and/or patient populations with different case mix. Public Library of Science 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7470390/ /pubmed/32881963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238587 Text en © 2020 Jahn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jahn, Michael Rekowski, Jan Jánosi, Rolf Alexander Kribben, Andreas Canbay, Ali Katsounas, Antonios Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP |
title | Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP |
title_full | Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP |
title_fullStr | Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP |
title_full_unstemmed | Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP |
title_short | Score performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in combination with biomarkers IL-6, PCT or CRP |
title_sort | score performance of saps 2 and saps 3 in combination with biomarkers il-6, pct or crp |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32881963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jahnmichael scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp AT rekowskijan scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp AT janosirolfalexander scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp AT kribbenandreas scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp AT canbayali scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp AT katsounasantonios scoreperformanceofsaps2andsaps3incombinationwithbiomarkersil6pctorcrp |