Cargando…

Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting

BACKGROUND: Globally obstetric anesthesia is being done under spinal and epidural than general anesthesia (GA) for most caesarean sections (CSs). This is because GA is associated with failed endotracheal intubation and aspiration of gastric contents. Eventhough general anesthesia is the fastest meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agegnehu, Abatneh Feleke, Gebregzi, Amare Hailekiros, Endalew, Nigussie Simeneh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2020.08.013
_version_ 1783578631767851008
author Agegnehu, Abatneh Feleke
Gebregzi, Amare Hailekiros
Endalew, Nigussie Simeneh
author_facet Agegnehu, Abatneh Feleke
Gebregzi, Amare Hailekiros
Endalew, Nigussie Simeneh
author_sort Agegnehu, Abatneh Feleke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Globally obstetric anesthesia is being done under spinal and epidural than general anesthesia (GA) for most caesarean sections (CSs). This is because GA is associated with failed endotracheal intubation and aspiration of gastric contents. Eventhough general anesthesia is the fastest method for anesthetizing a category 1 cesarean section, it is associated with increased maternal mortality and morbidity. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred regional technique for cesarean section but failure sometimes occurs. To minimize the time factor of spinal anesthesia as well as to avoid the side effects of general anesthesia ‘rapid sequence spinal ‘(RSS) has developed as a novel approach in cases of category one cesarean sections. METHODS: The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Search engines like PubMed through HINARI, Cochrane database and Google Scholars were used to find high-level evidences that help to draw appropriate conclusions. DISCUSSION: Neuraxial anesthetic techniques have several advantages which include low risk of aspiration and failed intubation, avoidance of central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory depressant drugs, the ability to maintain a wakeful state of mother enjoying the experience of delivery of baby and also lower incidence of blood loss. ‘Rapid sequence spinal’ described to minimize anesthetic time. This consists of a no-touch spinal technique, consideration of omission of the spinal opioid, limiting spinal attempts, allowing the start of surgery before full establishment of the spinal block, and being prepared for conversion to general anesthesia if there are delays or problems. To do rapid sequence spinal anesthesia safely and timely, cooperative work is mandatory with good team relation for those simultaneous and necessary tasks. CONCLUSION: The choice of anesthetic in Cesarean section has long been recognized as one of prime importance, because there are two lives to safeguard instead of one. A balance must be struck between the anesthetic dictated by the general condition of the mother and that suited to the needs of the fetal respiratory system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7470710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74707102020-09-04 Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting Agegnehu, Abatneh Feleke Gebregzi, Amare Hailekiros Endalew, Nigussie Simeneh Int J Surg Open Review Article BACKGROUND: Globally obstetric anesthesia is being done under spinal and epidural than general anesthesia (GA) for most caesarean sections (CSs). This is because GA is associated with failed endotracheal intubation and aspiration of gastric contents. Eventhough general anesthesia is the fastest method for anesthetizing a category 1 cesarean section, it is associated with increased maternal mortality and morbidity. Spinal anesthesia is the preferred regional technique for cesarean section but failure sometimes occurs. To minimize the time factor of spinal anesthesia as well as to avoid the side effects of general anesthesia ‘rapid sequence spinal ‘(RSS) has developed as a novel approach in cases of category one cesarean sections. METHODS: The study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Search engines like PubMed through HINARI, Cochrane database and Google Scholars were used to find high-level evidences that help to draw appropriate conclusions. DISCUSSION: Neuraxial anesthetic techniques have several advantages which include low risk of aspiration and failed intubation, avoidance of central nervous system (CNS) and respiratory depressant drugs, the ability to maintain a wakeful state of mother enjoying the experience of delivery of baby and also lower incidence of blood loss. ‘Rapid sequence spinal’ described to minimize anesthetic time. This consists of a no-touch spinal technique, consideration of omission of the spinal opioid, limiting spinal attempts, allowing the start of surgery before full establishment of the spinal block, and being prepared for conversion to general anesthesia if there are delays or problems. To do rapid sequence spinal anesthesia safely and timely, cooperative work is mandatory with good team relation for those simultaneous and necessary tasks. CONCLUSION: The choice of anesthetic in Cesarean section has long been recognized as one of prime importance, because there are two lives to safeguard instead of one. A balance must be struck between the anesthetic dictated by the general condition of the mother and that suited to the needs of the fetal respiratory system. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd. 2020 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7470710/ /pubmed/34568612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2020.08.013 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review Article
Agegnehu, Abatneh Feleke
Gebregzi, Amare Hailekiros
Endalew, Nigussie Simeneh
Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
title Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
title_full Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
title_fullStr Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
title_full_unstemmed Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
title_short Review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
title_sort review of evidences for management of rapid sequence spinal anesthesia for category one cesarean section, in resource limiting setting
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34568612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2020.08.013
work_keys_str_mv AT agegnehuabatnehfeleke reviewofevidencesformanagementofrapidsequencespinalanesthesiaforcategoryonecesareansectioninresourcelimitingsetting
AT gebregziamarehailekiros reviewofevidencesformanagementofrapidsequencespinalanesthesiaforcategoryonecesareansectioninresourcelimitingsetting
AT endalewnigussiesimeneh reviewofevidencesformanagementofrapidsequencespinalanesthesiaforcategoryonecesareansectioninresourcelimitingsetting