Cargando…

Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery

BACKGROUND: This research evaluated the numbness produced by lignocaine at an equal or higher concentration than that of 4% articaine through a single point of injection for maxillary third molar surgery. This randomized double-blind study was conducted to compare the anesthetic efficiency of 4% lig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phyo, Hnin Ei, Chaiyasamut, Teeranut, Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai, Pairuchvej, Verasak, Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash, Wongsirichat, Natthamet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934986
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203
_version_ 1783578688338526208
author Phyo, Hnin Ei
Chaiyasamut, Teeranut
Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai
Pairuchvej, Verasak
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
Wongsirichat, Natthamet
author_facet Phyo, Hnin Ei
Chaiyasamut, Teeranut
Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai
Pairuchvej, Verasak
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
Wongsirichat, Natthamet
author_sort Phyo, Hnin Ei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This research evaluated the numbness produced by lignocaine at an equal or higher concentration than that of 4% articaine through a single point of injection for maxillary third molar surgery. This randomized double-blind study was conducted to compare the anesthetic efficiency of 4% lignocaine with that of 4% articaine in impacted maxillary third molar surgery using a single buccal infiltration alone. METHODS: The study participants were 30 healthy patients requiring the bilateral surgical removal of symmetrically-positioned maxillary third molars. Using a split-mouth design, each patient randomly received buccal infiltration of 1.7 ml of 4% lignocaine and 1.7 ml of 4% articaine during two separate appointments. After 15 minutes of anesthetic injection, surgery was performed by the same surgeon using a consistent technique on both sides. Pinprick test pain scores of the buccal and palatal gingiva of the maxillary third molar after 10 minutes and 15 minutes latencies, pain scores during the surgery, the need for supplemental anesthesia, and patients' satisfaction with anesthetic efficiency were recorded. Surgery performed without supplemental anesthesia was categorized as successful. RESULTS: The success rates of 4% lignocaine and 4% articaine (83.34% vs. 86.67%, P = 1.00) were not significantly different. Only 5 cases (4 cases in the articaine group and 1 case in the lignocaine group) reported mild pain and pressure sensation (NRS ≤ 1) on probing at the palatal side after 15 minutes of latency (P = 0.25). The pain scores of maxillary third molar surgery in the two groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Moreover, the statistical analysis confirmed the comparable patient satisfaction of two study groups (P = 0.284). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that single buccal infiltrations of 4% lignocaine and 4% articaine have comparable anesthetic efficacy and success rates for impacted maxillary third molar surgery. Both 4% lignocaine and 4% articaine can produce effective palatal anesthesia and pain control using buccal infiltration alone after 15 minutes of latency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7470997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74709972020-09-14 Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery Phyo, Hnin Ei Chaiyasamut, Teeranut Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai Pairuchvej, Verasak Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash Wongsirichat, Natthamet J Dent Anesth Pain Med Original Article BACKGROUND: This research evaluated the numbness produced by lignocaine at an equal or higher concentration than that of 4% articaine through a single point of injection for maxillary third molar surgery. This randomized double-blind study was conducted to compare the anesthetic efficiency of 4% lignocaine with that of 4% articaine in impacted maxillary third molar surgery using a single buccal infiltration alone. METHODS: The study participants were 30 healthy patients requiring the bilateral surgical removal of symmetrically-positioned maxillary third molars. Using a split-mouth design, each patient randomly received buccal infiltration of 1.7 ml of 4% lignocaine and 1.7 ml of 4% articaine during two separate appointments. After 15 minutes of anesthetic injection, surgery was performed by the same surgeon using a consistent technique on both sides. Pinprick test pain scores of the buccal and palatal gingiva of the maxillary third molar after 10 minutes and 15 minutes latencies, pain scores during the surgery, the need for supplemental anesthesia, and patients' satisfaction with anesthetic efficiency were recorded. Surgery performed without supplemental anesthesia was categorized as successful. RESULTS: The success rates of 4% lignocaine and 4% articaine (83.34% vs. 86.67%, P = 1.00) were not significantly different. Only 5 cases (4 cases in the articaine group and 1 case in the lignocaine group) reported mild pain and pressure sensation (NRS ≤ 1) on probing at the palatal side after 15 minutes of latency (P = 0.25). The pain scores of maxillary third molar surgery in the two groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Moreover, the statistical analysis confirmed the comparable patient satisfaction of two study groups (P = 0.284). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that single buccal infiltrations of 4% lignocaine and 4% articaine have comparable anesthetic efficacy and success rates for impacted maxillary third molar surgery. Both 4% lignocaine and 4% articaine can produce effective palatal anesthesia and pain control using buccal infiltration alone after 15 minutes of latency. The Korean Dental Society of Anesthsiology 2020-08 2020-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7470997/ /pubmed/32934986 http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203 Text en Copyright © 2020 Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Phyo, Hnin Ei
Chaiyasamut, Teeranut
Kiattavorncharoen, Sirichai
Pairuchvej, Verasak
Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
Wongsirichat, Natthamet
Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
title Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
title_full Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
title_fullStr Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
title_full_unstemmed Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
title_short Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
title_sort single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7470997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934986
http://dx.doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.203
work_keys_str_mv AT phyohninei singlebuccalinfiltrationofhighconcentrationlignocaineversusarticaineinmaxillarythirdmolarsurgery
AT chaiyasamutteeranut singlebuccalinfiltrationofhighconcentrationlignocaineversusarticaineinmaxillarythirdmolarsurgery
AT kiattavorncharoensirichai singlebuccalinfiltrationofhighconcentrationlignocaineversusarticaineinmaxillarythirdmolarsurgery
AT pairuchvejverasak singlebuccalinfiltrationofhighconcentrationlignocaineversusarticaineinmaxillarythirdmolarsurgery
AT bhattaraibishwaprakash singlebuccalinfiltrationofhighconcentrationlignocaineversusarticaineinmaxillarythirdmolarsurgery
AT wongsirichatnatthamet singlebuccalinfiltrationofhighconcentrationlignocaineversusarticaineinmaxillarythirdmolarsurgery