On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)

Rosenberg and Schwartz (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 473–482, 2019) criticize a number of aspects of the Behavior Analyst Certification Board’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts and propose, as an alternative, a decision-making process for evaluating the ethicality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sellers, Tyra P., Carr, James E., Nosik, Melissa R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Discussion and Review Paper
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00463-6
_version_ 1783578737985454080
author Sellers, Tyra P.
Carr, James E.
Nosik, Melissa R.
author_facet Sellers, Tyra P.
Carr, James E.
Nosik, Melissa R.
author_sort Sellers, Tyra P.
collection PubMed
description Rosenberg and Schwartz (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 473–482, 2019) criticize a number of aspects of the Behavior Analyst Certification Board’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts and propose, as an alternative, a decision-making process for evaluating the ethicality of behavior under a particular set of circumstances. We respond to the authors’ main criticisms and discuss the broader professional and legal context of any profession’s ethics code and enforcement activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7471222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74712222020-09-18 On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019) Sellers, Tyra P. Carr, James E. Nosik, Melissa R. Behav Anal Pract Discussion and Review Paper Rosenberg and Schwartz (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12, 473–482, 2019) criticize a number of aspects of the Behavior Analyst Certification Board’s Professional and Ethical Compliance Code for Behavior Analysts and propose, as an alternative, a decision-making process for evaluating the ethicality of behavior under a particular set of circumstances. We respond to the authors’ main criticisms and discuss the broader professional and legal context of any profession’s ethics code and enforcement activity. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7471222/ /pubmed/32953399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00463-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Discussion and Review Paper
Sellers, Tyra P.
Carr, James E.
Nosik, Melissa R.
On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)
title On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)
title_full On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)
title_fullStr On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)
title_full_unstemmed On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)
title_short On the BACB’s Ethics Requirements: A Response to Rosenberg and Schwartz (2019)
title_sort on the bacb’s ethics requirements: a response to rosenberg and schwartz (2019)
topic Discussion and Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32953399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00463-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sellerstyrap onthebacbsethicsrequirementsaresponsetorosenbergandschwartz2019
AT carrjamese onthebacbsethicsrequirementsaresponsetorosenbergandschwartz2019
AT nosikmelissar onthebacbsethicsrequirementsaresponsetorosenbergandschwartz2019

Ejemplares similares