Cargando…
Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms
As an indirect and computational imaging approach, imaging reconstruction efficiency is critical for ghost imaging (GI). Here, we compare different GI algorithms, including logarithmic GI and exponential GI we proposed, by numerically analysing their imaging reconstruction efficiency and error toler...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71642-2 |
_version_ | 1783578755468361728 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Hong-Chao |
author_facet | Liu, Hong-Chao |
author_sort | Liu, Hong-Chao |
collection | PubMed |
description | As an indirect and computational imaging approach, imaging reconstruction efficiency is critical for ghost imaging (GI). Here, we compare different GI algorithms, including logarithmic GI and exponential GI we proposed, by numerically analysing their imaging reconstruction efficiency and error tolerance. Simulation results show that compressive GI algorithm has the highest reconstruction efficiency due to its global optimization property. Error tolerance studies further manifest that compressive GI and exponential GI are sensitive to the error ratio. By replacing the bucket input of compressive GI with different bucket object signal functions, we integrate compressive GI with other GI algorithms and discuss their imaging efficiency. With the combination between the differential GI (or normalized GI) and compressive GI, both reconstruction efficiency and error tolerance will present the best performance. Moreover, an optical encryption is proposed by combining logarithmic GI, exponential GI and compressive GI, which can enhance the encryption security based on GI principle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7471319 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74713192020-09-04 Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms Liu, Hong-Chao Sci Rep Article As an indirect and computational imaging approach, imaging reconstruction efficiency is critical for ghost imaging (GI). Here, we compare different GI algorithms, including logarithmic GI and exponential GI we proposed, by numerically analysing their imaging reconstruction efficiency and error tolerance. Simulation results show that compressive GI algorithm has the highest reconstruction efficiency due to its global optimization property. Error tolerance studies further manifest that compressive GI and exponential GI are sensitive to the error ratio. By replacing the bucket input of compressive GI with different bucket object signal functions, we integrate compressive GI with other GI algorithms and discuss their imaging efficiency. With the combination between the differential GI (or normalized GI) and compressive GI, both reconstruction efficiency and error tolerance will present the best performance. Moreover, an optical encryption is proposed by combining logarithmic GI, exponential GI and compressive GI, which can enhance the encryption security based on GI principle. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7471319/ /pubmed/32884085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71642-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Liu, Hong-Chao Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
title | Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
title_full | Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
title_fullStr | Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
title_short | Imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
title_sort | imaging reconstruction comparison of different ghost imaging algorithms |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471319/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32884085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71642-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuhongchao imagingreconstructioncomparisonofdifferentghostimagingalgorithms |