Cargando…

A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients

As of August 06, 2020, 18.9 million cases of SARS-CoV-2 and more than 711,000 deaths have been reported. As per available data, 80% of the patients experience mild disease, 20% need hospital admission, and about 5% require intensive care. To date, several modes of transmission such as droplet, conta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karia, Rutu, Nagraj, Sanjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00499-3
_version_ 1783578791976632320
author Karia, Rutu
Nagraj, Sanjana
author_facet Karia, Rutu
Nagraj, Sanjana
author_sort Karia, Rutu
collection PubMed
description As of August 06, 2020, 18.9 million cases of SARS-CoV-2 and more than 711,000 deaths have been reported. As per available data, 80% of the patients experience mild disease, 20% need hospital admission, and about 5% require intensive care. To date, several modes of transmission such as droplet, contact, airborne, blood borne, and fomite have been described as plausible. Several studies have demonstrated shedding of the virus from patients after being free from symptoms, i.e. prolonged virus shedding. While few studies demonstrated virus shedding in convalescent patients, i.e. those testing negative for presence of virus on nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs, yet virus shedding was reported from other sources. Maximum duration of conversion time reported among the included studies was 60 days, while the least duration was 3 days. Viral shedding from sources other than nasopharynx and oropharynx, like stools, urine, saliva, semen, and tears, was reported. More number of studies described virus shedding from gastrointestinal tract (mainly in stools), while least a number of cases tested positive for the virus in tears. Prolonged viral shedding is important to consider while discontinuing isolation procedures and/or discharging SARS-CoV-2 patients. The risk of transmission varies in magnitude and depends on the infectivity of the shed virus in biological samples and the patient population involved. Clinical decision-making should be governed by clinical scenario, guidelines, detectable viral load, source of detectable virus, infectivity, and patient-related factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7471550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74715502020-09-04 A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients Karia, Rutu Nagraj, Sanjana SN Compr Clin Med Covid-19 As of August 06, 2020, 18.9 million cases of SARS-CoV-2 and more than 711,000 deaths have been reported. As per available data, 80% of the patients experience mild disease, 20% need hospital admission, and about 5% require intensive care. To date, several modes of transmission such as droplet, contact, airborne, blood borne, and fomite have been described as plausible. Several studies have demonstrated shedding of the virus from patients after being free from symptoms, i.e. prolonged virus shedding. While few studies demonstrated virus shedding in convalescent patients, i.e. those testing negative for presence of virus on nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs, yet virus shedding was reported from other sources. Maximum duration of conversion time reported among the included studies was 60 days, while the least duration was 3 days. Viral shedding from sources other than nasopharynx and oropharynx, like stools, urine, saliva, semen, and tears, was reported. More number of studies described virus shedding from gastrointestinal tract (mainly in stools), while least a number of cases tested positive for the virus in tears. Prolonged viral shedding is important to consider while discontinuing isolation procedures and/or discharging SARS-CoV-2 patients. The risk of transmission varies in magnitude and depends on the infectivity of the shed virus in biological samples and the patient population involved. Clinical decision-making should be governed by clinical scenario, guidelines, detectable viral load, source of detectable virus, infectivity, and patient-related factors. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7471550/ /pubmed/32901229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00499-3 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Covid-19
Karia, Rutu
Nagraj, Sanjana
A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
title A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
title_full A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
title_fullStr A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
title_short A Review of Viral Shedding in Resolved and Convalescent COVID-19 Patients
title_sort review of viral shedding in resolved and convalescent covid-19 patients
topic Covid-19
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32901229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42399-020-00499-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kariarutu areviewofviralsheddinginresolvedandconvalescentcovid19patients
AT nagrajsanjana areviewofviralsheddinginresolvedandconvalescentcovid19patients
AT kariarutu reviewofviralsheddinginresolvedandconvalescentcovid19patients
AT nagrajsanjana reviewofviralsheddinginresolvedandconvalescentcovid19patients