Cargando…
Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective
This exploratory study was aimed at evaluating the current status of global occupational therapy practice on the use of assessments for clients with cognitive impairments and providing recommendations for ongoing evidence. We targeted international occupational therapy clinicians working with client...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8914372 |
_version_ | 1783578849407139840 |
---|---|
author | Manee, Fahad S. Nadar, Mohammed Shaban Alotaibi, Naser M. Rassafiani, Mehdi |
author_facet | Manee, Fahad S. Nadar, Mohammed Shaban Alotaibi, Naser M. Rassafiani, Mehdi |
author_sort | Manee, Fahad S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This exploratory study was aimed at evaluating the current status of global occupational therapy practice on the use of assessments for clients with cognitive impairments and providing recommendations for ongoing evidence. We targeted international occupational therapy clinicians working with clients experiencing neurocognitive impairments. 323 occupational therapists from a wide range of clinical practice areas participated in the study. A large number of therapists used noncognitive specific assessments with a focus on functional approaches. The most commonly used standardized assessments were the COPM (56.7%), followed by MMSE (54.2%) and MoCA (45.5%), while the nonstandardized assessments were clinical observation (38.4%) and generic ADL assessment (34.1%). The use of main assessments was significantly different across world regions (p < 0.05), as were the reasons for choosing them (p < 0.05). The occupational therapists' use of assessment tools with clients suffering from neurocognitive impairments is inconsistent across the globe. The identification of international best practices for selecting and implementing proper outcome measures is warranted. It is essential to promote the development of an occupational therapy initiative to support the use of appropriate assessments at the international levels to facilitate consistent best practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7471821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74718212020-09-14 Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective Manee, Fahad S. Nadar, Mohammed Shaban Alotaibi, Naser M. Rassafiani, Mehdi Occup Ther Int Research Article This exploratory study was aimed at evaluating the current status of global occupational therapy practice on the use of assessments for clients with cognitive impairments and providing recommendations for ongoing evidence. We targeted international occupational therapy clinicians working with clients experiencing neurocognitive impairments. 323 occupational therapists from a wide range of clinical practice areas participated in the study. A large number of therapists used noncognitive specific assessments with a focus on functional approaches. The most commonly used standardized assessments were the COPM (56.7%), followed by MMSE (54.2%) and MoCA (45.5%), while the nonstandardized assessments were clinical observation (38.4%) and generic ADL assessment (34.1%). The use of main assessments was significantly different across world regions (p < 0.05), as were the reasons for choosing them (p < 0.05). The occupational therapists' use of assessment tools with clients suffering from neurocognitive impairments is inconsistent across the globe. The identification of international best practices for selecting and implementing proper outcome measures is warranted. It is essential to promote the development of an occupational therapy initiative to support the use of appropriate assessments at the international levels to facilitate consistent best practice. Hindawi 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7471821/ /pubmed/32934613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8914372 Text en Copyright © 2020 Fahad S. Manee et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Manee, Fahad S. Nadar, Mohammed Shaban Alotaibi, Naser M. Rassafiani, Mehdi Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective |
title | Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective |
title_full | Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective |
title_fullStr | Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective |
title_short | Cognitive Assessments Used in Occupational Therapy Practice: A Global Perspective |
title_sort | cognitive assessments used in occupational therapy practice: a global perspective |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8914372 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maneefahads cognitiveassessmentsusedinoccupationaltherapypracticeaglobalperspective AT nadarmohammedshaban cognitiveassessmentsusedinoccupationaltherapypracticeaglobalperspective AT alotaibinaserm cognitiveassessmentsusedinoccupationaltherapypracticeaglobalperspective AT rassafianimehdi cognitiveassessmentsusedinoccupationaltherapypracticeaglobalperspective |