Cargando…

Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study

Corneal astigmatism significantly compromises uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) after phacoemulsification with implantation of traditional spherical or non-spherical monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). Toric IOL provides an effective way to gain favorable postoperative UCVA for the patients with catara...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Juan-Juan, Qin, Ya-Zhou, Qin, Li, Li, Jing-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934690
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9153
_version_ 1783578855449034752
author Yang, Juan-Juan
Qin, Ya-Zhou
Qin, Li
Li, Jing-Ming
author_facet Yang, Juan-Juan
Qin, Ya-Zhou
Qin, Li
Li, Jing-Ming
author_sort Yang, Juan-Juan
collection PubMed
description Corneal astigmatism significantly compromises uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) after phacoemulsification with implantation of traditional spherical or non-spherical monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). Toric IOL provides an effective way to gain favorable postoperative UCVA for the patients with cataracts with corneal astigmatism. There are numerous types of toric IOLs; however AcrySof(®) IQ toric IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) and TECNIS(®) toric IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision; Johnson & Johnson) are most frequently used in our clinical practice. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical efficacy of AcrySof IQ with TECNIS toric IOL implantation, and to provide a clinical basis on selecting an appropriate toric IOL before cataract surgery for patients with corneal astigmatism. A total of 30 patients with cataract (44 eyes) with corneal astigmatism [0.82-7.27 diopters (D)], who have undergone phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation between October 2012 and December 2017, were included in the current retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups: One group (26 eyes) received the AcrySof IQ toric IOL (AcrySof group) and the other group (18 eyes) received the TECNIS toric IOL (Tecnis group). The indexes of curative effect, such as uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, respectively), refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity (CS), IOL rotation, and satisfaction, were evaluated. Both toric IOLs significantly improved UDVA and CDVA. Postoperative mean residual astigmatism was similar in the AcrySof group and in the Tecnis group (0.75±0.50 and 0.78±0.90 D; P=0.896). There was no statistically significant between postoperative CS in the AcrySof and Tecnis groups. Rotations of >10˚ were considered to be significant and were identified in three eyes. The mean IOL rotation showed no statistically significant difference (AcrySof group, 0.24±5.54˚; Tecnis group, -0.19±6.28˚; P=0.416). The mean patient satisfaction score was 8.46±1.21 in the AcrySof group and 8.78±1.44 in the Tecnis group (P=0.260). The results of the current study indicated that patients with cataracts with corneal astigmatism undergoing phacoemulsification with AcrySof IQ and TECNIS toric IOL implantation achieved similar clinical efficacy in term of visual outcomes, refraction correction, CS, rotational stability and satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7471847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74718472020-09-14 Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study Yang, Juan-Juan Qin, Ya-Zhou Qin, Li Li, Jing-Ming Exp Ther Med Articles Corneal astigmatism significantly compromises uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) after phacoemulsification with implantation of traditional spherical or non-spherical monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). Toric IOL provides an effective way to gain favorable postoperative UCVA for the patients with cataracts with corneal astigmatism. There are numerous types of toric IOLs; however AcrySof(®) IQ toric IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) and TECNIS(®) toric IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision; Johnson & Johnson) are most frequently used in our clinical practice. The purpose of the current study was to compare the clinical efficacy of AcrySof IQ with TECNIS toric IOL implantation, and to provide a clinical basis on selecting an appropriate toric IOL before cataract surgery for patients with corneal astigmatism. A total of 30 patients with cataract (44 eyes) with corneal astigmatism [0.82-7.27 diopters (D)], who have undergone phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation between October 2012 and December 2017, were included in the current retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into two groups: One group (26 eyes) received the AcrySof IQ toric IOL (AcrySof group) and the other group (18 eyes) received the TECNIS toric IOL (Tecnis group). The indexes of curative effect, such as uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA and CDVA, respectively), refractive outcomes, contrast sensitivity (CS), IOL rotation, and satisfaction, were evaluated. Both toric IOLs significantly improved UDVA and CDVA. Postoperative mean residual astigmatism was similar in the AcrySof group and in the Tecnis group (0.75±0.50 and 0.78±0.90 D; P=0.896). There was no statistically significant between postoperative CS in the AcrySof and Tecnis groups. Rotations of >10˚ were considered to be significant and were identified in three eyes. The mean IOL rotation showed no statistically significant difference (AcrySof group, 0.24±5.54˚; Tecnis group, -0.19±6.28˚; P=0.416). The mean patient satisfaction score was 8.46±1.21 in the AcrySof group and 8.78±1.44 in the Tecnis group (P=0.260). The results of the current study indicated that patients with cataracts with corneal astigmatism undergoing phacoemulsification with AcrySof IQ and TECNIS toric IOL implantation achieved similar clinical efficacy in term of visual outcomes, refraction correction, CS, rotational stability and satisfaction. D.A. Spandidos 2020-11 2020-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7471847/ /pubmed/32934690 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9153 Text en Copyright: © Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Yang, Juan-Juan
Qin, Ya-Zhou
Qin, Li
Li, Jing-Ming
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study
title Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study
title_full Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study
title_short Comparison of the clinical efficacy of AcrySof(®) IQ and TECNIS(®) toric intraocular lenses: A real-world study
title_sort comparison of the clinical efficacy of acrysof(®) iq and tecnis(®) toric intraocular lenses: a real-world study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7471847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32934690
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9153
work_keys_str_mv AT yangjuanjuan comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofacrysofiqandtecnistoricintraocularlensesarealworldstudy
AT qinyazhou comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofacrysofiqandtecnistoricintraocularlensesarealworldstudy
AT qinli comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofacrysofiqandtecnistoricintraocularlensesarealworldstudy
AT lijingming comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyofacrysofiqandtecnistoricintraocularlensesarealworldstudy