Cargando…

Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension

Hypotensive events in the initial stage of anesthesia can cause serious complications in the patients after surgery, which could be fatal. In this study, we intended to predict hypotension after tracheal intubation using machine learning and deep learning techniques after intubation one minute in ad...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jihyun, Woo, Jiyoung, Kang, Ah Reum, Jeong, Young-Seob, Jung, Woohyun, Lee, Misoon, Kim, Sang Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164575
_version_ 1783578892244615168
author Lee, Jihyun
Woo, Jiyoung
Kang, Ah Reum
Jeong, Young-Seob
Jung, Woohyun
Lee, Misoon
Kim, Sang Hyun
author_facet Lee, Jihyun
Woo, Jiyoung
Kang, Ah Reum
Jeong, Young-Seob
Jung, Woohyun
Lee, Misoon
Kim, Sang Hyun
author_sort Lee, Jihyun
collection PubMed
description Hypotensive events in the initial stage of anesthesia can cause serious complications in the patients after surgery, which could be fatal. In this study, we intended to predict hypotension after tracheal intubation using machine learning and deep learning techniques after intubation one minute in advance. Meta learning models, such as random forest, extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost), and deep learning models, especially the convolutional neural network (CNN) model and the deep neural network (DNN), were trained to predict hypotension occurring between tracheal intubation and incision, using data from four minutes to one minute before tracheal intubation. Vital records and electronic health records (EHR) for 282 of 319 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from October 2018 to July 2019 were collected. Among the 282 patients, 151 developed post-induction hypotension. Our experiments had two scenarios: using raw vital records and feature engineering on vital records. The experiments on raw data showed that CNN had the best accuracy of 72.63%, followed by random forest (70.32%) and Xgboost (64.6%). The experiments on feature engineering showed that random forest combined with feature selection had the best accuracy of 74.89%, while CNN had a lower accuracy of 68.95% than that of the experiment on raw data. Our study is an extension of previous studies to detect hypotension before intubation with a one-minute advance. To improve accuracy, we built a model using state-of-art algorithms. We found that CNN had a good performance, but that random forest had a better performance when combined with feature selection. In addition, we found that the examination period (data period) is also important.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7472016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74720162020-09-17 Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension Lee, Jihyun Woo, Jiyoung Kang, Ah Reum Jeong, Young-Seob Jung, Woohyun Lee, Misoon Kim, Sang Hyun Sensors (Basel) Article Hypotensive events in the initial stage of anesthesia can cause serious complications in the patients after surgery, which could be fatal. In this study, we intended to predict hypotension after tracheal intubation using machine learning and deep learning techniques after intubation one minute in advance. Meta learning models, such as random forest, extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost), and deep learning models, especially the convolutional neural network (CNN) model and the deep neural network (DNN), were trained to predict hypotension occurring between tracheal intubation and incision, using data from four minutes to one minute before tracheal intubation. Vital records and electronic health records (EHR) for 282 of 319 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from October 2018 to July 2019 were collected. Among the 282 patients, 151 developed post-induction hypotension. Our experiments had two scenarios: using raw vital records and feature engineering on vital records. The experiments on raw data showed that CNN had the best accuracy of 72.63%, followed by random forest (70.32%) and Xgboost (64.6%). The experiments on feature engineering showed that random forest combined with feature selection had the best accuracy of 74.89%, while CNN had a lower accuracy of 68.95% than that of the experiment on raw data. Our study is an extension of previous studies to detect hypotension before intubation with a one-minute advance. To improve accuracy, we built a model using state-of-art algorithms. We found that CNN had a good performance, but that random forest had a better performance when combined with feature selection. In addition, we found that the examination period (data period) is also important. MDPI 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7472016/ /pubmed/32824073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164575 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Jihyun
Woo, Jiyoung
Kang, Ah Reum
Jeong, Young-Seob
Jung, Woohyun
Lee, Misoon
Kim, Sang Hyun
Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension
title Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension
title_full Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension
title_short Comparative Analysis on Machine Learning and Deep Learning to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension
title_sort comparative analysis on machine learning and deep learning to predict post-induction hypotension
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32824073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164575
work_keys_str_mv AT leejihyun comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension
AT woojiyoung comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension
AT kangahreum comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension
AT jeongyoungseob comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension
AT jungwoohyun comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension
AT leemisoon comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension
AT kimsanghyun comparativeanalysisonmachinelearninganddeeplearningtopredictpostinductionhypotension