Cargando…
Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM ha...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32806735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164515 |
_version_ | 1783578915696017408 |
---|---|
author | Bullmann, Markus Fetzer, Toni Ebner, Frank Ebner, Markus Deinzer, Frank Grzegorzek, Marcin |
author_facet | Bullmann, Markus Fetzer, Toni Ebner, Frank Ebner, Markus Deinzer, Frank Grzegorzek, Marcin |
author_sort | Bullmann, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM has gotten more attention from the scientific community as more compatible devices become available. Due to the claimed robustness and accuracy, FTM is a promising addition to the often used Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI). In this work, we evaluate FTM on the 2.4 GHz band with 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the context of realistic indoor positioning scenarios. For this purpose, we deploy a least-squares estimation method, a probabilistic positioning approach and a simplistic particle filter implementation. Each method is evaluated using FTM and RSSI separately to show the difference of the techniques. Our results show that, although FTM achieves smaller positioning errors compared to RSSI, its error behavior is similar to RSSI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an empirically optimized correction value for FTM is required to account for the environment. This correction value can reduce the positioning error significantly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7472118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74721182020-09-04 Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios Bullmann, Markus Fetzer, Toni Ebner, Frank Ebner, Markus Deinzer, Frank Grzegorzek, Marcin Sensors (Basel) Article With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM has gotten more attention from the scientific community as more compatible devices become available. Due to the claimed robustness and accuracy, FTM is a promising addition to the often used Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI). In this work, we evaluate FTM on the 2.4 GHz band with 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the context of realistic indoor positioning scenarios. For this purpose, we deploy a least-squares estimation method, a probabilistic positioning approach and a simplistic particle filter implementation. Each method is evaluated using FTM and RSSI separately to show the difference of the techniques. Our results show that, although FTM achieves smaller positioning errors compared to RSSI, its error behavior is similar to RSSI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an empirically optimized correction value for FTM is required to account for the environment. This correction value can reduce the positioning error significantly. MDPI 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7472118/ /pubmed/32806735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164515 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bullmann, Markus Fetzer, Toni Ebner, Frank Ebner, Markus Deinzer, Frank Grzegorzek, Marcin Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios |
title | Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios |
title_full | Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios |
title_fullStr | Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios |
title_short | Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios |
title_sort | comparison of 2.4 ghz wifi ftm- and rssi-based indoor positioning methods in realistic scenarios |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32806735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bullmannmarkus comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios AT fetzertoni comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios AT ebnerfrank comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios AT ebnermarkus comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios AT deinzerfrank comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios AT grzegorzekmarcin comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios |