Cargando…

Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios

With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bullmann, Markus, Fetzer, Toni, Ebner, Frank, Ebner, Markus, Deinzer, Frank, Grzegorzek, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32806735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164515
_version_ 1783578915696017408
author Bullmann, Markus
Fetzer, Toni
Ebner, Frank
Ebner, Markus
Deinzer, Frank
Grzegorzek, Marcin
author_facet Bullmann, Markus
Fetzer, Toni
Ebner, Frank
Ebner, Markus
Deinzer, Frank
Grzegorzek, Marcin
author_sort Bullmann, Markus
collection PubMed
description With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM has gotten more attention from the scientific community as more compatible devices become available. Due to the claimed robustness and accuracy, FTM is a promising addition to the often used Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI). In this work, we evaluate FTM on the 2.4 GHz band with 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the context of realistic indoor positioning scenarios. For this purpose, we deploy a least-squares estimation method, a probabilistic positioning approach and a simplistic particle filter implementation. Each method is evaluated using FTM and RSSI separately to show the difference of the techniques. Our results show that, although FTM achieves smaller positioning errors compared to RSSI, its error behavior is similar to RSSI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an empirically optimized correction value for FTM is required to account for the environment. This correction value can reduce the positioning error significantly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7472118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74721182020-09-04 Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios Bullmann, Markus Fetzer, Toni Ebner, Frank Ebner, Markus Deinzer, Frank Grzegorzek, Marcin Sensors (Basel) Article With the addition of the Fine Timing Measurement (FTM) protocol in IEEE 802.11-2016, a promising sensor for smartphone-based indoor positioning systems was introduced. FTM enables a Wi-Fi device to estimate the distance to a second device based on the propagation time of the signal. Recently, FTM has gotten more attention from the scientific community as more compatible devices become available. Due to the claimed robustness and accuracy, FTM is a promising addition to the often used Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI). In this work, we evaluate FTM on the 2.4 GHz band with 20 MHz channel bandwidth in the context of realistic indoor positioning scenarios. For this purpose, we deploy a least-squares estimation method, a probabilistic positioning approach and a simplistic particle filter implementation. Each method is evaluated using FTM and RSSI separately to show the difference of the techniques. Our results show that, although FTM achieves smaller positioning errors compared to RSSI, its error behavior is similar to RSSI. Furthermore, we demonstrate that an empirically optimized correction value for FTM is required to account for the environment. This correction value can reduce the positioning error significantly. MDPI 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7472118/ /pubmed/32806735 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164515 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bullmann, Markus
Fetzer, Toni
Ebner, Frank
Ebner, Markus
Deinzer, Frank
Grzegorzek, Marcin
Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
title Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
title_full Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
title_fullStr Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
title_short Comparison of 2.4 GHz WiFi FTM- and RSSI-Based Indoor Positioning Methods in Realistic Scenarios
title_sort comparison of 2.4 ghz wifi ftm- and rssi-based indoor positioning methods in realistic scenarios
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32806735
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20164515
work_keys_str_mv AT bullmannmarkus comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios
AT fetzertoni comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios
AT ebnerfrank comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios
AT ebnermarkus comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios
AT deinzerfrank comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios
AT grzegorzekmarcin comparisonof24ghzwififtmandrssibasedindoorpositioningmethodsinrealisticscenarios