Cargando…

Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes

PURPOSE: We conducted a scoping review of quality improvement in care homes. We aimed to identify participating occupational groups and methods for evaluation. Secondly, we aimed to describe resident-level interventions and which outcomes were measured. METHODS: Following extended PRISMA guideline f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chadborn, Neil H., Devi, Reena, Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn, Banerjee, Jay, Gordon, Adam L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32888183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w
_version_ 1783579085915553792
author Chadborn, Neil H.
Devi, Reena
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Banerjee, Jay
Gordon, Adam L.
author_facet Chadborn, Neil H.
Devi, Reena
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Banerjee, Jay
Gordon, Adam L.
author_sort Chadborn, Neil H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We conducted a scoping review of quality improvement in care homes. We aimed to identify participating occupational groups and methods for evaluation. Secondly, we aimed to describe resident-level interventions and which outcomes were measured. METHODS: Following extended PRISMA guideline for scoping reviews, we conducted systematic searches of Medline, CINAHL, Psychinfo, and ASSIA (2000–2019). Furthermore, we searched systematic reviews databases including Cochrane Library and JBI, and the grey literature database, Greylit. Four co-authors contributed to selection and data extraction. RESULTS: Sixty five studies were included, 6 of which had multiple publications (75 articles overall). A range of quality improvement strategies were implemented, including audit feedback and quality improvement collaboratives. Methods consisted of controlled trials, quantitative time series and qualitative interview and observational studies. Process evaluations, involving staff of various occupational groups, described experiences and implementation measures. Many studies measured resident-level outputs and health outcomes. 14 studies reported improvements to a clinical measure; however, four of these articles were of low quality. Larger randomised controlled studies did not show statistically significant benefits to resident health outcomes. CONCLUSION: In care homes, quality improvement has been applied with several different strategies, being evaluated by a variety of measures. In terms of measuring benefits to residents, process outputs and health outcomes have been reported. There was no pattern of which quality improvement strategy was used for which clinical problem. Further development of reporting of quality improvement projects and outcomes could facilitate implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7472942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74729422020-09-08 Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes Chadborn, Neil H. Devi, Reena Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn Banerjee, Jay Gordon, Adam L. Eur Geriatr Med Review PURPOSE: We conducted a scoping review of quality improvement in care homes. We aimed to identify participating occupational groups and methods for evaluation. Secondly, we aimed to describe resident-level interventions and which outcomes were measured. METHODS: Following extended PRISMA guideline for scoping reviews, we conducted systematic searches of Medline, CINAHL, Psychinfo, and ASSIA (2000–2019). Furthermore, we searched systematic reviews databases including Cochrane Library and JBI, and the grey literature database, Greylit. Four co-authors contributed to selection and data extraction. RESULTS: Sixty five studies were included, 6 of which had multiple publications (75 articles overall). A range of quality improvement strategies were implemented, including audit feedback and quality improvement collaboratives. Methods consisted of controlled trials, quantitative time series and qualitative interview and observational studies. Process evaluations, involving staff of various occupational groups, described experiences and implementation measures. Many studies measured resident-level outputs and health outcomes. 14 studies reported improvements to a clinical measure; however, four of these articles were of low quality. Larger randomised controlled studies did not show statistically significant benefits to resident health outcomes. CONCLUSION: In care homes, quality improvement has been applied with several different strategies, being evaluated by a variety of measures. In terms of measuring benefits to residents, process outputs and health outcomes have been reported. There was no pattern of which quality improvement strategy was used for which clinical problem. Further development of reporting of quality improvement projects and outcomes could facilitate implementation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-04 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7472942/ /pubmed/32888183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Chadborn, Neil H.
Devi, Reena
Hinsliff-Smith, Kathryn
Banerjee, Jay
Gordon, Adam L.
Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
title Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
title_full Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
title_fullStr Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
title_full_unstemmed Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
title_short Quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
title_sort quality improvement in long-term care settings: a scoping review of effective strategies used in care homes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32888183
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41999-020-00389-w
work_keys_str_mv AT chadbornneilh qualityimprovementinlongtermcaresettingsascopingreviewofeffectivestrategiesusedincarehomes
AT devireena qualityimprovementinlongtermcaresettingsascopingreviewofeffectivestrategiesusedincarehomes
AT hinsliffsmithkathryn qualityimprovementinlongtermcaresettingsascopingreviewofeffectivestrategiesusedincarehomes
AT banerjeejay qualityimprovementinlongtermcaresettingsascopingreviewofeffectivestrategiesusedincarehomes
AT gordonadaml qualityimprovementinlongtermcaresettingsascopingreviewofeffectivestrategiesusedincarehomes