Cargando…

The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis

AIM: Survival rates and prognostic factors of cortical ependymomas (CEs) remain elusive. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment, and outcomes for patients with CEs based on institutional and literature case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Qiguang, Cheng, Jian, Li, Jiuhong, Zhang, Si, Liu, Wenke, Ju, Yan, Hui, Xuhui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01585
_version_ 1783579095997612032
author Wang, Qiguang
Cheng, Jian
Li, Jiuhong
Zhang, Si
Liu, Wenke
Ju, Yan
Hui, Xuhui
author_facet Wang, Qiguang
Cheng, Jian
Li, Jiuhong
Zhang, Si
Liu, Wenke
Ju, Yan
Hui, Xuhui
author_sort Wang, Qiguang
collection PubMed
description AIM: Survival rates and prognostic factors of cortical ependymomas (CEs) remain elusive. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment, and outcomes for patients with CEs based on institutional and literature case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with CEs from our department were included in this study. Furthermore, a systemic review of the literature yielded an additional 106 patients with CEs. Clinical data including patient age, sex, symptoms, tumor location, World Health Organization (WHO) grade, extent of surgery, radiation, recurrence, and survival were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2009 to October 2019, 30 (4.2%) cases were diagnosed as CEs in our department. These series consisted of 19 males and 11 females, 10 continuous patients after 2017 screened for C11orf95-RELA fusion, and 9 patients (90%) were RELA fusion positive. During the follow-up period, nine (30%) patients depicted tumor recurrence or progression; four (13.3%) patients died of tumor progression. The literature review yielded 106 CE cases, with additional 30 cases of our own collected for further analysis. Of these 136 cases, the frontal lobe (40%) was the most common location, and the average age was 22.6 ± 17.6 years. Anaplastic histology/WHO grade III tumors were identified in 68 (50%) patients. Statistically analysis demonstrated that extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors in Kaplan–Meier log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models. Gross total resection (GTR) predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) [P = 0.013, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.257–7.213] and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.003, HR = 5.322, 95% CI = 1.751–16.178). WHO grade III tumors had worse PFS (P = 0.002, HR = 5.17, 95% CI = 1.804–14.816) and OS (P = 0.025, HR = 5.640, 95% CI = 1.248–25.495). CONCLUSION: CEs accounted for only 3.5 to 5.7% of ependymomas, with seizures the most common symptom and the frontal lobe the most frequent location. CEs may have higher rate of RELA fusions, but generally favorable prognosis. The extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. GTTR or WHO grade II tumors had better overall outcome in patients with CEs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7472988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74729882020-09-23 The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis Wang, Qiguang Cheng, Jian Li, Jiuhong Zhang, Si Liu, Wenke Ju, Yan Hui, Xuhui Front Oncol Oncology AIM: Survival rates and prognostic factors of cortical ependymomas (CEs) remain elusive. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment, and outcomes for patients with CEs based on institutional and literature case series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with CEs from our department were included in this study. Furthermore, a systemic review of the literature yielded an additional 106 patients with CEs. Clinical data including patient age, sex, symptoms, tumor location, World Health Organization (WHO) grade, extent of surgery, radiation, recurrence, and survival were recorded and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2009 to October 2019, 30 (4.2%) cases were diagnosed as CEs in our department. These series consisted of 19 males and 11 females, 10 continuous patients after 2017 screened for C11orf95-RELA fusion, and 9 patients (90%) were RELA fusion positive. During the follow-up period, nine (30%) patients depicted tumor recurrence or progression; four (13.3%) patients died of tumor progression. The literature review yielded 106 CE cases, with additional 30 cases of our own collected for further analysis. Of these 136 cases, the frontal lobe (40%) was the most common location, and the average age was 22.6 ± 17.6 years. Anaplastic histology/WHO grade III tumors were identified in 68 (50%) patients. Statistically analysis demonstrated that extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors in Kaplan–Meier log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards models. Gross total resection (GTR) predicted longer progression-free survival (PFS) [P = 0.013, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.012, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.257–7.213] and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.003, HR = 5.322, 95% CI = 1.751–16.178). WHO grade III tumors had worse PFS (P = 0.002, HR = 5.17, 95% CI = 1.804–14.816) and OS (P = 0.025, HR = 5.640, 95% CI = 1.248–25.495). CONCLUSION: CEs accounted for only 3.5 to 5.7% of ependymomas, with seizures the most common symptom and the frontal lobe the most frequent location. CEs may have higher rate of RELA fusions, but generally favorable prognosis. The extent of surgery and WHO tumor grade were significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. GTTR or WHO grade II tumors had better overall outcome in patients with CEs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7472988/ /pubmed/32974195 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01585 Text en Copyright © 2020 Wang, Cheng, Li, Zhang, Liu, Ju and Hui. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wang, Qiguang
Cheng, Jian
Li, Jiuhong
Zhang, Si
Liu, Wenke
Ju, Yan
Hui, Xuhui
The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis
title The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis
title_full The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis
title_fullStr The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis
title_short The Survival and Prognostic Factors of Supratentorial Cortical Ependymomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature-Based Analysis
title_sort survival and prognostic factors of supratentorial cortical ependymomas: a retrospective cohort study and literature-based analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7472988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32974195
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01585
work_keys_str_mv AT wangqiguang thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT chengjian thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT lijiuhong thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT zhangsi thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT liuwenke thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT juyan thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT huixuhui thesurvivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT wangqiguang survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT chengjian survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT lijiuhong survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT zhangsi survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT liuwenke survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT juyan survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis
AT huixuhui survivalandprognosticfactorsofsupratentorialcorticalependymomasaretrospectivecohortstudyandliteraturebasedanalysis