Cargando…
Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with unilater...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105 |
_version_ | 1783579097687916544 |
---|---|
author | Omran, Mohamed Sakr, Ahmed Desoky, Esam A. E. Ali, Maged M. Abdalla, Mohamed M. H. |
author_facet | Omran, Mohamed Sakr, Ahmed Desoky, Esam A. E. Ali, Maged M. Abdalla, Mohamed M. H. |
author_sort | Omran, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with unilateral single UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, treated with SWL; and Group 2, treated with URS (6/7.5 F) and laser lithotripsy. The patients’ characteristics, stones demographics, operative time, adjunctive procedures, stone-free rate (SFR), re-treatment rate, and complications were statistically analysed and compared. Success was defined as stone-free status (no stone residual of ≥0.3 cm) at 1 month from the initial treatment without any auxiliary procedures. RESULTS: In all, 68 patients with UUT stones met our inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient or stone demographics. In Group 1, the SFR was 26/34 (76.4%) and in Group 2 it was 33/34 (97.1%) (P = 0.03). A total of 12 auxiliary procedures in Group 1 and two in Group 2 were needed to reach a 100% SFR (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups for operative times, adjunctive procedures, number of complicated cases or complications of Grade ≥III (P = 0.65, P = 0.23, P = 0.77, and P = 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Miniature semi-rigid URS with Ho-YAG laser lithotripsy for UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm in children was more effective than SWL in terms of SFR and re-treatment rate, with no significant difference in the rate or grade of complications. ABBREVIATIONS: EQ: efficiency quotient; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SFR: stone-free rate; SWL: shockwave lithotripsy; URS: ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography/ultrasound; URS: ureteroscopy; UUT: upper urinary tract; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7473001 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74730012020-10-06 Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children Omran, Mohamed Sakr, Ahmed Desoky, Esam A. E. Ali, Maged M. Abdalla, Mohamed M. H. Arab J Urol Paediatric Urology OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with unilateral single UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, treated with SWL; and Group 2, treated with URS (6/7.5 F) and laser lithotripsy. The patients’ characteristics, stones demographics, operative time, adjunctive procedures, stone-free rate (SFR), re-treatment rate, and complications were statistically analysed and compared. Success was defined as stone-free status (no stone residual of ≥0.3 cm) at 1 month from the initial treatment without any auxiliary procedures. RESULTS: In all, 68 patients with UUT stones met our inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient or stone demographics. In Group 1, the SFR was 26/34 (76.4%) and in Group 2 it was 33/34 (97.1%) (P = 0.03). A total of 12 auxiliary procedures in Group 1 and two in Group 2 were needed to reach a 100% SFR (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups for operative times, adjunctive procedures, number of complicated cases or complications of Grade ≥III (P = 0.65, P = 0.23, P = 0.77, and P = 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Miniature semi-rigid URS with Ho-YAG laser lithotripsy for UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm in children was more effective than SWL in terms of SFR and re-treatment rate, with no significant difference in the rate or grade of complications. ABBREVIATIONS: EQ: efficiency quotient; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SFR: stone-free rate; SWL: shockwave lithotripsy; URS: ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography/ultrasound; URS: ureteroscopy; UUT: upper urinary tract; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet Taylor & Francis 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7473001/ /pubmed/33029415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Paediatric Urology Omran, Mohamed Sakr, Ahmed Desoky, Esam A. E. Ali, Maged M. Abdalla, Mohamed M. H. Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
title | Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
title_full | Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
title_fullStr | Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
title_full_unstemmed | Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
title_short | Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
title_sort | miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children |
topic | Paediatric Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473001/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT omranmohamed miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren AT sakrahmed miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren AT desokyesamae miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren AT alimagedm miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren AT abdallamohamedmh miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren |