Cargando…

Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with unilater...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omran, Mohamed, Sakr, Ahmed, Desoky, Esam A. E., Ali, Maged M., Abdalla, Mohamed M. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105
_version_ 1783579097687916544
author Omran, Mohamed
Sakr, Ahmed
Desoky, Esam A. E.
Ali, Maged M.
Abdalla, Mohamed M. H.
author_facet Omran, Mohamed
Sakr, Ahmed
Desoky, Esam A. E.
Ali, Maged M.
Abdalla, Mohamed M. H.
author_sort Omran, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with unilateral single UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, treated with SWL; and Group 2, treated with URS (6/7.5 F) and laser lithotripsy. The patients’ characteristics, stones demographics, operative time, adjunctive procedures, stone-free rate (SFR), re-treatment rate, and complications were statistically analysed and compared. Success was defined as stone-free status (no stone residual of ≥0.3 cm) at 1 month from the initial treatment without any auxiliary procedures. RESULTS: In all, 68 patients with UUT stones met our inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient or stone demographics. In Group 1, the SFR was 26/34 (76.4%) and in Group 2 it was 33/34 (97.1%) (P = 0.03). A total of 12 auxiliary procedures in Group 1 and two in Group 2 were needed to reach a 100% SFR (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups for operative times, adjunctive procedures, number of complicated cases or complications of Grade ≥III (P = 0.65, P = 0.23, P = 0.77, and P = 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Miniature semi-rigid URS with Ho-YAG laser lithotripsy for UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm in children was more effective than SWL in terms of SFR and re-treatment rate, with no significant difference in the rate or grade of complications. ABBREVIATIONS: EQ: efficiency quotient; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SFR: stone-free rate; SWL: shockwave lithotripsy; URS: ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography/ultrasound; URS: ureteroscopy; UUT: upper urinary tract; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473001
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74730012020-10-06 Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children Omran, Mohamed Sakr, Ahmed Desoky, Esam A. E. Ali, Maged M. Abdalla, Mohamed M. H. Arab J Urol Paediatric Urology OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy (URS) with holmium (Ho)-yttrium-aluminium-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy vs shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for treating upper urinary tract (UUT) calculi >1 cm in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with unilateral single UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group 1, treated with SWL; and Group 2, treated with URS (6/7.5 F) and laser lithotripsy. The patients’ characteristics, stones demographics, operative time, adjunctive procedures, stone-free rate (SFR), re-treatment rate, and complications were statistically analysed and compared. Success was defined as stone-free status (no stone residual of ≥0.3 cm) at 1 month from the initial treatment without any auxiliary procedures. RESULTS: In all, 68 patients with UUT stones met our inclusion criteria. There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient or stone demographics. In Group 1, the SFR was 26/34 (76.4%) and in Group 2 it was 33/34 (97.1%) (P = 0.03). A total of 12 auxiliary procedures in Group 1 and two in Group 2 were needed to reach a 100% SFR (P = 0.014). There were no significant differences between the two groups for operative times, adjunctive procedures, number of complicated cases or complications of Grade ≥III (P = 0.65, P = 0.23, P = 0.77, and P = 0.62, respectively). CONCLUSION: Miniature semi-rigid URS with Ho-YAG laser lithotripsy for UUT ureteric stones of >1 cm in children was more effective than SWL in terms of SFR and re-treatment rate, with no significant difference in the rate or grade of complications. ABBREVIATIONS: EQ: efficiency quotient; KUB: plain abdominal radiograph of the kidneys, ureters and bladder; RCT: randomised controlled trial; SFR: stone-free rate; SWL: shockwave lithotripsy; URS: ureteroscopy; US: ultrasonography/ultrasound; URS: ureteroscopy; UUT: upper urinary tract; YAG: yttrium-aluminium-garnet Taylor & Francis 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7473001/ /pubmed/33029415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Paediatric Urology
Omran, Mohamed
Sakr, Ahmed
Desoky, Esam A. E.
Ali, Maged M.
Abdalla, Mohamed M. H.
Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
title Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
title_full Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
title_fullStr Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
title_full_unstemmed Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
title_short Miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
title_sort miniature semi-rigid ureteroscopy with holmium-yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser vs shockwave lithotripsy in the management of upper urinary tract stones >1 cm in children
topic Paediatric Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473001/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1738105
work_keys_str_mv AT omranmohamed miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren
AT sakrahmed miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren
AT desokyesamae miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren
AT alimagedm miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren
AT abdallamohamedmh miniaturesemirigidureteroscopywithholmiumyttriumaluminiumgarnetlaservsshockwavelithotripsyinthemanagementofupperurinarytractstones1cminchildren