Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103

The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of gender-responsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those gender-responsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women’s empow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, Quisumbing, Agnes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society for Plant Pathology and Springer Nature B.V. 2018
Materias:
Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32968461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7
_version_ 1783579112374272000
author Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
Quisumbing, Agnes
author_facet Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
Quisumbing, Agnes
author_sort Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
collection PubMed
description The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of gender-responsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those gender-responsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women’s empowerment in agricultural development. It notes accomplishments and points out some shortcomings for both organizations to address. Although the objectives of the paper are worthwhile, we note important problems regarding methodology used, factual errors, and misrepresentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Society for Plant Pathology and Springer Nature B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74730692020-09-21 Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103 Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Quisumbing, Agnes Food Secur Articles The paper by Garcia and Wanner reviews examples of gender-responsive research and programming from the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to discuss those gender-responsive approaches which are most successful for achieving women’s empowerment in agricultural development. It notes accomplishments and points out some shortcomings for both organizations to address. Although the objectives of the paper are worthwhile, we note important problems regarding methodology used, factual errors, and misrepresentation. International Society for Plant Pathology and Springer Nature B.V. 2018-01-26 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC7473069/ /pubmed/32968461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Articles
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth
Quisumbing, Agnes
Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
title Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
title_full Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
title_fullStr Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
title_full_unstemmed Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
title_short Response to Garcia and Wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation” Food Security (2017) 9:1091–1103
title_sort response to garcia and wanner “gender inequality and food security: lessons for the gender-responsive work of the international food policy research institute and the bill and melinda gates foundation” food security (2017) 9:1091–1103
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32968461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0766-7
work_keys_str_mv AT meinzendickruth responsetogarciaandwannergenderinequalityandfoodsecuritylessonsforthegenderresponsiveworkoftheinternationalfoodpolicyresearchinstituteandthebillandmelindagatesfoundationfoodsecurity2017910911103
AT quisumbingagnes responsetogarciaandwannergenderinequalityandfoodsecuritylessonsforthegenderresponsiveworkoftheinternationalfoodpolicyresearchinstituteandthebillandmelindagatesfoundationfoodsecurity2017910911103

Ejemplares similares