Cargando…

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) ultrasound (US)-guided fusion biopsy (FB) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) under active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 47 patients under AS who consecutively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Röthlin, Kilian, Zamboni, Stefania, Moschini, Marco, Stucki, Patrick, Afferi, Luca, Baumeister, Philipp, Mattei, Agostino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1749477
_version_ 1783579117300482048
author Röthlin, Kilian
Zamboni, Stefania
Moschini, Marco
Stucki, Patrick
Afferi, Luca
Baumeister, Philipp
Mattei, Agostino
author_facet Röthlin, Kilian
Zamboni, Stefania
Moschini, Marco
Stucki, Patrick
Afferi, Luca
Baumeister, Philipp
Mattei, Agostino
author_sort Röthlin, Kilian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyse the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) ultrasound (US)-guided fusion biopsy (FB) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) under active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 47 patients under AS who consecutively underwent both FB and standard biopsy (SB), from May 2015 until November 2017. We defined FB as a transrectal US-guided biopsy based on mpMRI. The primary endpoint was to assess the rate of concordance between FB and SB in terms of diagnostic yield, as well as the rate of Gleason Score upgrading/downgrading between the two techniques. Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) was applied to test the concordance between FB and SB. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 20 (13–37) months. The median (IQR) number of cores taken was 13 (12–14) at SB and 4 (4–6) at FB. Overall, FB missed 12/47 (26%) PCa diagnoses compared to SB. There was concordance between SB and FB in 64% of the patients. The [Image: see text] showed a perfect agreement between SB and FB for the detection of PCa with Gleason Score 4 + 4 and a weak concordance for negative biopsies ([Image: see text] : 0.46) and for PCa with a Gleason Score 4 + 3 ([Image: see text] : 0.54). There was Gleason Score upgrading at FB in two of 47 (4%) patients, whereas there was downgrading in three of 47 (6%) patients. CONCLUSION: In our present study, FB showed no superiority over SB for the detection of PCa. On the contrary, FB had a high rate of missed PCa compared to SB. Further studies are required to ascertain the role of FB in AS. ABBREVIATIONS: AS: active surveillance; FB: fusion biopsy; IL: index lesion; IQR: interquartile range; mpMRI: multiparametric MRI; (cs)PCa: (clinically significant) prostate cancer; PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; PRIAS: Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance; ROI: region of interest; SB: standard biopsy
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74731022020-10-06 Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study Röthlin, Kilian Zamboni, Stefania Moschini, Marco Stucki, Patrick Afferi, Luca Baumeister, Philipp Mattei, Agostino Arab J Urol Oncology/ Reconstruction OBJECTIVE: To analyse the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) ultrasound (US)-guided fusion biopsy (FB) in patients with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) under active surveillance (AS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our retrospective study included 47 patients under AS who consecutively underwent both FB and standard biopsy (SB), from May 2015 until November 2017. We defined FB as a transrectal US-guided biopsy based on mpMRI. The primary endpoint was to assess the rate of concordance between FB and SB in terms of diagnostic yield, as well as the rate of Gleason Score upgrading/downgrading between the two techniques. Cohen’s kappa coefficient (κ) was applied to test the concordance between FB and SB. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was 20 (13–37) months. The median (IQR) number of cores taken was 13 (12–14) at SB and 4 (4–6) at FB. Overall, FB missed 12/47 (26%) PCa diagnoses compared to SB. There was concordance between SB and FB in 64% of the patients. The [Image: see text] showed a perfect agreement between SB and FB for the detection of PCa with Gleason Score 4 + 4 and a weak concordance for negative biopsies ([Image: see text] : 0.46) and for PCa with a Gleason Score 4 + 3 ([Image: see text] : 0.54). There was Gleason Score upgrading at FB in two of 47 (4%) patients, whereas there was downgrading in three of 47 (6%) patients. CONCLUSION: In our present study, FB showed no superiority over SB for the detection of PCa. On the contrary, FB had a high rate of missed PCa compared to SB. Further studies are required to ascertain the role of FB in AS. ABBREVIATIONS: AS: active surveillance; FB: fusion biopsy; IL: index lesion; IQR: interquartile range; mpMRI: multiparametric MRI; (cs)PCa: (clinically significant) prostate cancer; PI-RADS: Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System; PRIAS: Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance; ROI: region of interest; SB: standard biopsy Taylor & Francis 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7473102/ /pubmed/33029423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1749477 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology/ Reconstruction
Röthlin, Kilian
Zamboni, Stefania
Moschini, Marco
Stucki, Patrick
Afferi, Luca
Baumeister, Philipp
Mattei, Agostino
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study
title Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study
title_full Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study
title_fullStr Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study
title_full_unstemmed Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study
title_short Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: A single-centre study
title_sort multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy during active surveillance: a single-centre study
topic Oncology/ Reconstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1749477
work_keys_str_mv AT rothlinkilian multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy
AT zambonistefania multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy
AT moschinimarco multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy
AT stuckipatrick multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy
AT afferiluca multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy
AT baumeisterphilipp multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy
AT matteiagostino multiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingultrasoundguidedfusionbiopsyduringactivesurveillanceasinglecentrestudy