Cargando…

Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation

OBJECTIVE: To investigate complications and treatment failure rates of percutaneous renal cryoablation (PRC) for small renal masses under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (LACS), to assess the safety and effectiveness of this approach, as PRC is typically performed under general anaesthesia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Sagar Rohitkumar, Francois, Sean, Bhamber, Tiagpaul, Evans, Holt, Gaston, Kris, Riggs, Stephen B., Teigland, Chris, Clark, Peter E., Roy, Ornob P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1739382
_version_ 1783579119194210304
author Patel, Sagar Rohitkumar
Francois, Sean
Bhamber, Tiagpaul
Evans, Holt
Gaston, Kris
Riggs, Stephen B.
Teigland, Chris
Clark, Peter E.
Roy, Ornob P.
author_facet Patel, Sagar Rohitkumar
Francois, Sean
Bhamber, Tiagpaul
Evans, Holt
Gaston, Kris
Riggs, Stephen B.
Teigland, Chris
Clark, Peter E.
Roy, Ornob P.
author_sort Patel, Sagar Rohitkumar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate complications and treatment failure rates of percutaneous renal cryoablation (PRC) for small renal masses under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (LACS), to assess the safety and effectiveness of this approach, as PRC is typically performed under general anaesthesia (GA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed PRC under LACS from 2003 to 2017. We analysed perioperative parameters between patients who successfully underwent PRC under LACS and patients with post-procedural complications or treatment failure (renal mass enhancement after successful intraoperative tumour ablation). Two-sided non-parametric and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to compare uncomplicated or disease-free PRC with the complication or treatment failure group, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 100 PRCs under LACS were performed during the study period. Of these patients, six patients had at least one postoperative complication (6%), and treatment failure was diagnosed in nine patients (9%) after PRC [mean (SD) follow-up of 42.7 (26.6) months]. The procedural failure rate was 1%. No ablations were converted to GA. The mean tumour size was smaller in patients who had no complications during PRC compared to those who did, at a mean (SD) of 2.2 (0.6) cm vs 3.0 (1.0) cm (P = 0.039). The use of more intraoperative probes during the PRC was also associated with complications, at a mean (SD) 3.0 (1.4) vs 1.8 (0.8) (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: PRC under LACS is an effective and safe procedural approach for managing small renal masses with low complication, treatment failure, and procedural failure rates. Larger renal masses and intraoperative use of multiple probes is associated with an increased risk of PRC complications. ABBREVIATIONS: BMI: body mass index; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; GA: general anaesthesia; LACS: local anaesthesia and conscious sedation; PRC: percutaneous renal cryoablation; R.E.N.A.L.: Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473112
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74731122020-10-06 Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation Patel, Sagar Rohitkumar Francois, Sean Bhamber, Tiagpaul Evans, Holt Gaston, Kris Riggs, Stephen B. Teigland, Chris Clark, Peter E. Roy, Ornob P. Arab J Urol Oncology/ Reconstruction OBJECTIVE: To investigate complications and treatment failure rates of percutaneous renal cryoablation (PRC) for small renal masses under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (LACS), to assess the safety and effectiveness of this approach, as PRC is typically performed under general anaesthesia (GA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed PRC under LACS from 2003 to 2017. We analysed perioperative parameters between patients who successfully underwent PRC under LACS and patients with post-procedural complications or treatment failure (renal mass enhancement after successful intraoperative tumour ablation). Two-sided non-parametric and Fisher’s exact tests were performed to compare uncomplicated or disease-free PRC with the complication or treatment failure group, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 100 PRCs under LACS were performed during the study period. Of these patients, six patients had at least one postoperative complication (6%), and treatment failure was diagnosed in nine patients (9%) after PRC [mean (SD) follow-up of 42.7 (26.6) months]. The procedural failure rate was 1%. No ablations were converted to GA. The mean tumour size was smaller in patients who had no complications during PRC compared to those who did, at a mean (SD) of 2.2 (0.6) cm vs 3.0 (1.0) cm (P = 0.039). The use of more intraoperative probes during the PRC was also associated with complications, at a mean (SD) 3.0 (1.4) vs 1.8 (0.8) (P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: PRC under LACS is an effective and safe procedural approach for managing small renal masses with low complication, treatment failure, and procedural failure rates. Larger renal masses and intraoperative use of multiple probes is associated with an increased risk of PRC complications. ABBREVIATIONS: BMI: body mass index; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; GA: general anaesthesia; LACS: local anaesthesia and conscious sedation; PRC: percutaneous renal cryoablation; R.E.N.A.L.: Radius, Exophytic/Endophytic, Nearness, Anterior/Posterior, Location Taylor & Francis 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7473112/ /pubmed/33029426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1739382 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology/ Reconstruction
Patel, Sagar Rohitkumar
Francois, Sean
Bhamber, Tiagpaul
Evans, Holt
Gaston, Kris
Riggs, Stephen B.
Teigland, Chris
Clark, Peter E.
Roy, Ornob P.
Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
title Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
title_full Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
title_fullStr Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
title_full_unstemmed Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
title_short Safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
title_sort safety and effectiveness of percutaneous renal cryoablation with conscious sedation
topic Oncology/ Reconstruction
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473112/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33029426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2020.1739382
work_keys_str_mv AT patelsagarrohitkumar safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT francoissean safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT bhambertiagpaul safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT evansholt safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT gastonkris safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT riggsstephenb safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT teiglandchris safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT clarkpetere safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation
AT royornobp safetyandeffectivenessofpercutaneousrenalcryoablationwithconscioussedation