Cargando…
Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951 |
_version_ | 1783579121975033856 |
---|---|
author | Chia, Wan Ni Tan, Chee Wah Foo, Randy Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng Peng, Yilong Sivalingam, Velraj Tiu, Charles Ong, Xin Mei Zhu, Feng Young, Barnaby E. Chen, Mark I.-C. Tan, Yee-Joo Lye, David C. Anderson, Danielle E. Wang, Lin-Fa |
author_facet | Chia, Wan Ni Tan, Chee Wah Foo, Randy Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng Peng, Yilong Sivalingam, Velraj Tiu, Charles Ong, Xin Mei Zhu, Feng Young, Barnaby E. Chen, Mark I.-C. Tan, Yee-Joo Lye, David C. Anderson, Danielle E. Wang, Lin-Fa |
author_sort | Chia, Wan Ni |
collection | PubMed |
description | In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute diagnostic setting, serological tests are urgently needed. Unlike PCR tests which are highly specific, cross-reactivity is a major challenge for COVID-19 antibody tests considering there are six other coronaviruses known to infect humans. SARS-CoV is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2 sharing approximately 80% sequence identity and both belong to the species SARS related coronavirus in the genus Betacoronavirus of family Coronaviridae. We developed and compared the performance of four different serological tests to comprehensively assess the cross-reactivity between COVID-19 and SARS patient sera. There is significant cross-reactivity when N protein of either virus is used. The S1 or RBD regions from the spike (S) protein offers better specificity. Amongst the different platforms, capture ELISA performed best. We found that SARS survivors all have significant levels of antibodies remaining in their blood 17 years after infection. Anti-N antibodies waned more than anti-RBD antibodies, and the latter is known to play a more important role in providing protective immunity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7473126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74731262020-09-15 Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections Chia, Wan Ni Tan, Chee Wah Foo, Randy Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng Peng, Yilong Sivalingam, Velraj Tiu, Charles Ong, Xin Mei Zhu, Feng Young, Barnaby E. Chen, Mark I.-C. Tan, Yee-Joo Lye, David C. Anderson, Danielle E. Wang, Lin-Fa Emerg Microbes Infect Articles In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute diagnostic setting, serological tests are urgently needed. Unlike PCR tests which are highly specific, cross-reactivity is a major challenge for COVID-19 antibody tests considering there are six other coronaviruses known to infect humans. SARS-CoV is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2 sharing approximately 80% sequence identity and both belong to the species SARS related coronavirus in the genus Betacoronavirus of family Coronaviridae. We developed and compared the performance of four different serological tests to comprehensively assess the cross-reactivity between COVID-19 and SARS patient sera. There is significant cross-reactivity when N protein of either virus is used. The S1 or RBD regions from the spike (S) protein offers better specificity. Amongst the different platforms, capture ELISA performed best. We found that SARS survivors all have significant levels of antibodies remaining in their blood 17 years after infection. Anti-N antibodies waned more than anti-RBD antibodies, and the latter is known to play a more important role in providing protective immunity. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7473126/ /pubmed/32529906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of Shanghai Shangyixun Cultural Communication Co., Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Chia, Wan Ni Tan, Chee Wah Foo, Randy Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng Peng, Yilong Sivalingam, Velraj Tiu, Charles Ong, Xin Mei Zhu, Feng Young, Barnaby E. Chen, Mark I.-C. Tan, Yee-Joo Lye, David C. Anderson, Danielle E. Wang, Lin-Fa Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections |
title | Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections |
title_full | Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections |
title_fullStr | Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections |
title_full_unstemmed | Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections |
title_short | Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections |
title_sort | serological differentiation between covid-19 and sars infections |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chiawanni serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT tancheewah serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT foorandy serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT kangadrianengzheng serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT pengyilong serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT sivalingamvelraj serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT tiucharles serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT ongxinmei serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT zhufeng serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT youngbarnabye serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT chenmarkic serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT tanyeejoo serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT lyedavidc serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT andersondaniellee serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections AT wanglinfa serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections |