Cargando…

Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections

In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chia, Wan Ni, Tan, Chee Wah, Foo, Randy, Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng, Peng, Yilong, Sivalingam, Velraj, Tiu, Charles, Ong, Xin Mei, Zhu, Feng, Young, Barnaby E., Chen, Mark I.-C., Tan, Yee-Joo, Lye, David C., Anderson, Danielle E., Wang, Lin-Fa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951
_version_ 1783579121975033856
author Chia, Wan Ni
Tan, Chee Wah
Foo, Randy
Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng
Peng, Yilong
Sivalingam, Velraj
Tiu, Charles
Ong, Xin Mei
Zhu, Feng
Young, Barnaby E.
Chen, Mark I.-C.
Tan, Yee-Joo
Lye, David C.
Anderson, Danielle E.
Wang, Lin-Fa
author_facet Chia, Wan Ni
Tan, Chee Wah
Foo, Randy
Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng
Peng, Yilong
Sivalingam, Velraj
Tiu, Charles
Ong, Xin Mei
Zhu, Feng
Young, Barnaby E.
Chen, Mark I.-C.
Tan, Yee-Joo
Lye, David C.
Anderson, Danielle E.
Wang, Lin-Fa
author_sort Chia, Wan Ni
collection PubMed
description In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute diagnostic setting, serological tests are urgently needed. Unlike PCR tests which are highly specific, cross-reactivity is a major challenge for COVID-19 antibody tests considering there are six other coronaviruses known to infect humans. SARS-CoV is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2 sharing approximately 80% sequence identity and both belong to the species SARS related coronavirus in the genus Betacoronavirus of family Coronaviridae. We developed and compared the performance of four different serological tests to comprehensively assess the cross-reactivity between COVID-19 and SARS patient sera. There is significant cross-reactivity when N protein of either virus is used. The S1 or RBD regions from the spike (S) protein offers better specificity. Amongst the different platforms, capture ELISA performed best. We found that SARS survivors all have significant levels of antibodies remaining in their blood 17 years after infection. Anti-N antibodies waned more than anti-RBD antibodies, and the latter is known to play a more important role in providing protective immunity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74731262020-09-15 Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections Chia, Wan Ni Tan, Chee Wah Foo, Randy Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng Peng, Yilong Sivalingam, Velraj Tiu, Charles Ong, Xin Mei Zhu, Feng Young, Barnaby E. Chen, Mark I.-C. Tan, Yee-Joo Lye, David C. Anderson, Danielle E. Wang, Lin-Fa Emerg Microbes Infect Articles In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, caused by SARS-CoV-2, multiple diagnostic tests are required for acute disease diagnosis, contact tracing, monitoring asymptomatic infection rates and assessing herd immunity. While PCR remains the frontline test of choice in the acute diagnostic setting, serological tests are urgently needed. Unlike PCR tests which are highly specific, cross-reactivity is a major challenge for COVID-19 antibody tests considering there are six other coronaviruses known to infect humans. SARS-CoV is genetically related to SARS-CoV-2 sharing approximately 80% sequence identity and both belong to the species SARS related coronavirus in the genus Betacoronavirus of family Coronaviridae. We developed and compared the performance of four different serological tests to comprehensively assess the cross-reactivity between COVID-19 and SARS patient sera. There is significant cross-reactivity when N protein of either virus is used. The S1 or RBD regions from the spike (S) protein offers better specificity. Amongst the different platforms, capture ELISA performed best. We found that SARS survivors all have significant levels of antibodies remaining in their blood 17 years after infection. Anti-N antibodies waned more than anti-RBD antibodies, and the latter is known to play a more important role in providing protective immunity. Taylor & Francis 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7473126/ /pubmed/32529906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group, on behalf of Shanghai Shangyixun Cultural Communication Co., Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Chia, Wan Ni
Tan, Chee Wah
Foo, Randy
Kang, Adrian Eng Zheng
Peng, Yilong
Sivalingam, Velraj
Tiu, Charles
Ong, Xin Mei
Zhu, Feng
Young, Barnaby E.
Chen, Mark I.-C.
Tan, Yee-Joo
Lye, David C.
Anderson, Danielle E.
Wang, Lin-Fa
Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
title Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
title_full Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
title_fullStr Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
title_full_unstemmed Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
title_short Serological differentiation between COVID-19 and SARS infections
title_sort serological differentiation between covid-19 and sars infections
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32529906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1780951
work_keys_str_mv AT chiawanni serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT tancheewah serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT foorandy serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT kangadrianengzheng serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT pengyilong serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT sivalingamvelraj serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT tiucharles serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT ongxinmei serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT zhufeng serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT youngbarnabye serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT chenmarkic serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT tanyeejoo serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT lyedavidc serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT andersondaniellee serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections
AT wanglinfa serologicaldifferentiationbetweencovid19andsarsinfections