Cargando…
Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149)
Pulsed light (PL) inactivation kinetics of Escherichia coli K-12, Clostridium sporogenes and Geobacillus stearothermophilus were evaluated under different treatment conditions. The PL system was factory set to operate at three pulses per second with a pulse width of 360 μs exposing samples placed on...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.03.005 |
_version_ | 1783579167584944128 |
---|---|
author | John, Dalia Ramaswamy, Hosahalli S. |
author_facet | John, Dalia Ramaswamy, Hosahalli S. |
author_sort | John, Dalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pulsed light (PL) inactivation kinetics of Escherichia coli K-12, Clostridium sporogenes and Geobacillus stearothermophilus were evaluated under different treatment conditions. The PL system was factory set to operate at three pulses per second with a pulse width of 360 μs exposing samples placed on one of the 9 trays on a rack. Two PL parameters were evaluated in the study: number of pulses (a time factor) and the tray position (a spatial distance factor) both influencing the amount of light energy absorbed. As expected, the level of microbial inactivation increased with an increase in the number of pulses (from 1 to 15) and decreased with an increase in the Spatial distance (Tray # 1 to 9) away from the light source. Both the number of pulses and spatial distance as well as their interactions were found to have a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the extent of microbial inactivation. Vegetative cells of E. coli were most sensitive to PL treatment with a maximum 5 logarithmic reductions on Tray 1 after a 12-pulse treatment (4 s). G. stearothermophilus was more resistant to PL than C. sporogenes. Overall, the PL treatments (12–15 pulses) achieved a minimum four logarithmic reductions in the populations of all three microorganisms on the top tray at doses still below 12 J/cm(2), the FDA-approved limit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7473348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74733482020-09-09 Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) John, Dalia Ramaswamy, Hosahalli S. Curr Res Food Sci Research Article Pulsed light (PL) inactivation kinetics of Escherichia coli K-12, Clostridium sporogenes and Geobacillus stearothermophilus were evaluated under different treatment conditions. The PL system was factory set to operate at three pulses per second with a pulse width of 360 μs exposing samples placed on one of the 9 trays on a rack. Two PL parameters were evaluated in the study: number of pulses (a time factor) and the tray position (a spatial distance factor) both influencing the amount of light energy absorbed. As expected, the level of microbial inactivation increased with an increase in the number of pulses (from 1 to 15) and decreased with an increase in the Spatial distance (Tray # 1 to 9) away from the light source. Both the number of pulses and spatial distance as well as their interactions were found to have a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the extent of microbial inactivation. Vegetative cells of E. coli were most sensitive to PL treatment with a maximum 5 logarithmic reductions on Tray 1 after a 12-pulse treatment (4 s). G. stearothermophilus was more resistant to PL than C. sporogenes. Overall, the PL treatments (12–15 pulses) achieved a minimum four logarithmic reductions in the populations of all three microorganisms on the top tray at doses still below 12 J/cm(2), the FDA-approved limit. Elsevier 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7473348/ /pubmed/32914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.03.005 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article John, Dalia Ramaswamy, Hosahalli S. Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) |
title | Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) |
title_full | Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) |
title_fullStr | Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) |
title_short | Comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of Escherichia coli (ATCC-29055), Clostridium sporogenes (ATCC-7955) and Geobacillus stearothermophilus (ATCC-10149) |
title_sort | comparison of pulsed light inactivation kinetics and modeling of escherichia coli (atcc-29055), clostridium sporogenes (atcc-7955) and geobacillus stearothermophilus (atcc-10149) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32914124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2020.03.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johndalia comparisonofpulsedlightinactivationkineticsandmodelingofescherichiacoliatcc29055clostridiumsporogenesatcc7955andgeobacillusstearothermophilusatcc10149 AT ramaswamyhosahallis comparisonofpulsedlightinactivationkineticsandmodelingofescherichiacoliatcc29055clostridiumsporogenesatcc7955andgeobacillusstearothermophilusatcc10149 |