Cargando…

Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer

INTRODUCTION: Self-management support can enable and empower people living with and beyond cancer to take an active role in managing long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Healthcare professionals are key to promoting patients to self-manage, however, they do not routinely engage in these discu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kantilal, Kumud, Hardeman, Wendy, Whiteside, Hattie, Karapanagiotou, Eleni, Small, Matthew, Bhattacharya, Debi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32883731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037636
_version_ 1783579220413251584
author Kantilal, Kumud
Hardeman, Wendy
Whiteside, Hattie
Karapanagiotou, Eleni
Small, Matthew
Bhattacharya, Debi
author_facet Kantilal, Kumud
Hardeman, Wendy
Whiteside, Hattie
Karapanagiotou, Eleni
Small, Matthew
Bhattacharya, Debi
author_sort Kantilal, Kumud
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Self-management support can enable and empower people living with and beyond cancer to take an active role in managing long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Healthcare professionals are key to promoting patients to self-manage, however, they do not routinely engage in these discussions. This review aims to understand what works for whom and in what circumstances in relation to practitioners engaging with supporting people living with and beyond cancer to self-manage long-term consequences of systemic anticancer treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow five steps for undertaking the realist review: (1) define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) evidence search, (4) selection and appraisal and (5) data extraction and synthesis. We will combine an informal literature search with a theory-based approach, using the theoretical domains framework, and stakeholder feedback to develop initial programme theories. We will search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and AMED databases to September 2019, and supplement this with citation tracking, grey literature and practitioner surveys. Data selection will be based on relevance and rigour. Data will be extracted and synthesised iteratively, and causal links between contexts, mechanism and outcomes illuminated in the process. The results will be reported according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and publication standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We have received ethical approval through the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia (ref 2 01 819-124). We will disseminate to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. We will work with healthcare organisations, cancer charities and patients to agree a strategy for disseminating to these groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120910.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74736572020-09-16 Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer Kantilal, Kumud Hardeman, Wendy Whiteside, Hattie Karapanagiotou, Eleni Small, Matthew Bhattacharya, Debi BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Self-management support can enable and empower people living with and beyond cancer to take an active role in managing long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Healthcare professionals are key to promoting patients to self-manage, however, they do not routinely engage in these discussions. This review aims to understand what works for whom and in what circumstances in relation to practitioners engaging with supporting people living with and beyond cancer to self-manage long-term consequences of systemic anticancer treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow five steps for undertaking the realist review: (1) define the review scope, (2) develop initial programme theories, (3) evidence search, (4) selection and appraisal and (5) data extraction and synthesis. We will combine an informal literature search with a theory-based approach, using the theoretical domains framework, and stakeholder feedback to develop initial programme theories. We will search Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and AMED databases to September 2019, and supplement this with citation tracking, grey literature and practitioner surveys. Data selection will be based on relevance and rigour. Data will be extracted and synthesised iteratively, and causal links between contexts, mechanism and outcomes illuminated in the process. The results will be reported according to the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and publication standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We have received ethical approval through the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia (ref 2 01 819-124). We will disseminate to the research community through conference presentations and a peer-reviewed journal article. We will work with healthcare organisations, cancer charities and patients to agree a strategy for disseminating to these groups. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019120910. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7473657/ /pubmed/32883731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037636 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Oncology
Kantilal, Kumud
Hardeman, Wendy
Whiteside, Hattie
Karapanagiotou, Eleni
Small, Matthew
Bhattacharya, Debi
Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_full Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_fullStr Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_full_unstemmed Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_short Realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
title_sort realist review protocol for understanding the real-world barriers and enablers to practitioners implementing self-management support to people living with and beyond cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32883731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037636
work_keys_str_mv AT kantilalkumud realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT hardemanwendy realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT whitesidehattie realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT karapanagiotoueleni realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT smallmatthew realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer
AT bhattacharyadebi realistreviewprotocolforunderstandingtherealworldbarriersandenablerstopractitionersimplementingselfmanagementsupporttopeoplelivingwithandbeyondcancer