Cargando…

An Adherence-Enhancing Program Increases Retention in Care in the Swiss HIV Cohort

BACKGROUND: This study tested a theory-based adherence-enhancing intervention: the “Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program” (IMAP) to increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) retention in care. METHODS: We retrospectively compared our intervention center (intervention group [IG]) with a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamal, Susan, Glass, Tracy R, Doco-Lecompte, Thanh, Locher, Sophie, Bugnon, Olivier, Parienti, Jean-Jacques, Cavassini, Matthias, Schneider, Marie P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32913876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa323
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: This study tested a theory-based adherence-enhancing intervention: the “Interprofessional Medication Adherence Program” (IMAP) to increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) retention in care. METHODS: We retrospectively compared our intervention center (intervention group [IG]) with a standard of care center (control group [CG]) both participating in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study between 2004 and 2012. Endpoints were defined as >6-month and >12-month gaps in care for intervals of care longer than 6 and 12 months without any blood draw. Inverse probability of treatment weights was used to adjust for differences between patients at the 2 centers. Viral failure was defined as ribonucleic acid ≥50 copies/mL after 24+ weeks on antiretrovirals. RESULTS: The IG included 451 patients, CG 311. In the IG, 179 (40%) patients took part in the IMAP for a median of 27 months (interquartile range, 12–45). Gaps in care of ≥6 months were significantly more likely to happen in the CG versus IG (74.6% vs 57%, P < .001). The median time until the first treatment gap was longer in the IG vs CG (120 vs 84 weeks, P < .001). Gaps in care of ≥12 months evaluated in 709 (93%) patients were significantly more likely to occur in the CG compared with the IG (22.6% vs 12.5%, P < .001). The rate of viral failure was significantly lower in the IG (8.3% vs 15.1%, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: This study, in a real-world setting, shows the effectiveness of the IMAP to reduce 6- and 12-month gaps in follow up among people with HIV. These results should be confirmed by studies in other settings.