Cargando…

A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation

Mangrove forests provide many ecosystem services but are among the world’s most threatened ecosystems. Mangroves vary substantially according to their geomorphic and sedimentary setting; while several conceptual frameworks describe these settings, their spatial distribution has not been quantified....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Worthington, Thomas A., zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E., Friess, Daniel A., Krauss, Ken W., Lovelock, Catherine E., Thorley, Julia, Tingey, Rick, Woodroffe, Colin D., Bunting, Pete, Cormier, Nicole, Lagomasino, David, Lucas, Richard, Murray, Nicholas J., Sutherland, William J., Spalding, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71194-5
_version_ 1783579248540254208
author Worthington, Thomas A.
zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E.
Friess, Daniel A.
Krauss, Ken W.
Lovelock, Catherine E.
Thorley, Julia
Tingey, Rick
Woodroffe, Colin D.
Bunting, Pete
Cormier, Nicole
Lagomasino, David
Lucas, Richard
Murray, Nicholas J.
Sutherland, William J.
Spalding, Mark
author_facet Worthington, Thomas A.
zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E.
Friess, Daniel A.
Krauss, Ken W.
Lovelock, Catherine E.
Thorley, Julia
Tingey, Rick
Woodroffe, Colin D.
Bunting, Pete
Cormier, Nicole
Lagomasino, David
Lucas, Richard
Murray, Nicholas J.
Sutherland, William J.
Spalding, Mark
author_sort Worthington, Thomas A.
collection PubMed
description Mangrove forests provide many ecosystem services but are among the world’s most threatened ecosystems. Mangroves vary substantially according to their geomorphic and sedimentary setting; while several conceptual frameworks describe these settings, their spatial distribution has not been quantified. Here, we present a new global mangrove biophysical typology and show that, based on their 2016 extent, 40.5% (54,972 km(2)) of mangrove systems were deltaic, 27.5% (37,411 km(2)) were estuarine and 21.0% (28,493 km(2)) were open coast, with lagoonal mangroves the least abundant (11.0%, 14,993 km(2)). Mangroves were also classified based on their sedimentary setting, with carbonate mangroves being less abundant than terrigenous, representing just 9.6% of global coverage. Our typology provides a basis for future research to incorporate geomorphic and sedimentary setting in analyses. We present two examples of such applications. Firstly, based on change in extent between 1996 and 2016, we show while all types exhibited considerable declines in area, losses of lagoonal mangroves (− 6.9%) were nearly twice that of other types. Secondly, we quantify differences in aboveground biomass between mangroves of different types, with it being significantly lower in lagoonal mangroves. Overall, our biophysical typology provides a baseline for assessing restoration potential and for quantifying mangrove ecosystem service provision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74738522020-09-08 A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation Worthington, Thomas A. zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E. Friess, Daniel A. Krauss, Ken W. Lovelock, Catherine E. Thorley, Julia Tingey, Rick Woodroffe, Colin D. Bunting, Pete Cormier, Nicole Lagomasino, David Lucas, Richard Murray, Nicholas J. Sutherland, William J. Spalding, Mark Sci Rep Article Mangrove forests provide many ecosystem services but are among the world’s most threatened ecosystems. Mangroves vary substantially according to their geomorphic and sedimentary setting; while several conceptual frameworks describe these settings, their spatial distribution has not been quantified. Here, we present a new global mangrove biophysical typology and show that, based on their 2016 extent, 40.5% (54,972 km(2)) of mangrove systems were deltaic, 27.5% (37,411 km(2)) were estuarine and 21.0% (28,493 km(2)) were open coast, with lagoonal mangroves the least abundant (11.0%, 14,993 km(2)). Mangroves were also classified based on their sedimentary setting, with carbonate mangroves being less abundant than terrigenous, representing just 9.6% of global coverage. Our typology provides a basis for future research to incorporate geomorphic and sedimentary setting in analyses. We present two examples of such applications. Firstly, based on change in extent between 1996 and 2016, we show while all types exhibited considerable declines in area, losses of lagoonal mangroves (− 6.9%) were nearly twice that of other types. Secondly, we quantify differences in aboveground biomass between mangroves of different types, with it being significantly lower in lagoonal mangroves. Overall, our biophysical typology provides a baseline for assessing restoration potential and for quantifying mangrove ecosystem service provision. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7473852/ /pubmed/32887898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71194-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Worthington, Thomas A.
zu Ermgassen, Philine S. E.
Friess, Daniel A.
Krauss, Ken W.
Lovelock, Catherine E.
Thorley, Julia
Tingey, Rick
Woodroffe, Colin D.
Bunting, Pete
Cormier, Nicole
Lagomasino, David
Lucas, Richard
Murray, Nicholas J.
Sutherland, William J.
Spalding, Mark
A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
title A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
title_full A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
title_fullStr A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
title_full_unstemmed A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
title_short A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
title_sort global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32887898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71194-5
work_keys_str_mv AT worthingtonthomasa aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT zuermgassenphilinese aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT friessdaniela aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT krausskenw aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT lovelockcatherinee aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT thorleyjulia aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT tingeyrick aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT woodroffecolind aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT buntingpete aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT cormiernicole aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT lagomasinodavid aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT lucasrichard aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT murraynicholasj aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT sutherlandwilliamj aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT spaldingmark aglobalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT worthingtonthomasa globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT zuermgassenphilinese globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT friessdaniela globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT krausskenw globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT lovelockcatherinee globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT thorleyjulia globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT tingeyrick globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT woodroffecolind globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT buntingpete globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT cormiernicole globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT lagomasinodavid globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT lucasrichard globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT murraynicholasj globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT sutherlandwilliamj globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation
AT spaldingmark globalbiophysicaltypologyofmangrovesanditsrelevanceforecosystemstructureanddeforestation