Cargando…

A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion

Neuroimaging studies have revealed two separate classes of category-selective regions specialized in optic flow (egomotion-compatible) processing and in scene/place perception. Despite the importance of both optic flow and scene/place recognition to estimate changes in position and orientation withi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sulpizio, Valentina, Galati, Gaspare, Fattori, Patrizia, Galletti, Claudio, Pitzalis, Sabrina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02112-8
_version_ 1783579258858242048
author Sulpizio, Valentina
Galati, Gaspare
Fattori, Patrizia
Galletti, Claudio
Pitzalis, Sabrina
author_facet Sulpizio, Valentina
Galati, Gaspare
Fattori, Patrizia
Galletti, Claudio
Pitzalis, Sabrina
author_sort Sulpizio, Valentina
collection PubMed
description Neuroimaging studies have revealed two separate classes of category-selective regions specialized in optic flow (egomotion-compatible) processing and in scene/place perception. Despite the importance of both optic flow and scene/place recognition to estimate changes in position and orientation within the environment during self-motion, the possible functional link between egomotion- and scene-selective regions has not yet been established. Here we reanalyzed functional magnetic resonance images from a large sample of participants performing two well-known “localizer” fMRI experiments, consisting in passive viewing of navigationally relevant stimuli such as buildings and places (scene/place stimulus) and coherently moving fields of dots simulating the visual stimulation during self-motion (flow fields). After interrogating the egomotion-selective areas with respect to the scene/place stimulus and the scene-selective areas with respect to flow fields, we found that the egomotion-selective areas V6+ and pIPS/V3A responded bilaterally more to scenes/places compared to faces, and all the scene-selective areas (parahippocampal place area or PPA, retrosplenial complex or RSC, and occipital place area or OPA) responded more to egomotion-compatible optic flow compared to random motion. The conjunction analysis between scene/place and flow field stimuli revealed that the most important focus of common activation was found in the dorsolateral parieto-occipital cortex, spanning the scene-selective OPA and the egomotion-selective pIPS/V3A. Individual inspection of the relative locations of these two regions revealed a partial overlap and a similar response profile to an independent low-level visual motion stimulus, suggesting that OPA and pIPS/V3A may be part of a unique motion-selective complex specialized in encoding both egomotion- and scene-relevant information, likely for the control of navigation in a structured environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00429-020-02112-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7473967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74739672020-09-16 A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion Sulpizio, Valentina Galati, Gaspare Fattori, Patrizia Galletti, Claudio Pitzalis, Sabrina Brain Struct Funct Original Article Neuroimaging studies have revealed two separate classes of category-selective regions specialized in optic flow (egomotion-compatible) processing and in scene/place perception. Despite the importance of both optic flow and scene/place recognition to estimate changes in position and orientation within the environment during self-motion, the possible functional link between egomotion- and scene-selective regions has not yet been established. Here we reanalyzed functional magnetic resonance images from a large sample of participants performing two well-known “localizer” fMRI experiments, consisting in passive viewing of navigationally relevant stimuli such as buildings and places (scene/place stimulus) and coherently moving fields of dots simulating the visual stimulation during self-motion (flow fields). After interrogating the egomotion-selective areas with respect to the scene/place stimulus and the scene-selective areas with respect to flow fields, we found that the egomotion-selective areas V6+ and pIPS/V3A responded bilaterally more to scenes/places compared to faces, and all the scene-selective areas (parahippocampal place area or PPA, retrosplenial complex or RSC, and occipital place area or OPA) responded more to egomotion-compatible optic flow compared to random motion. The conjunction analysis between scene/place and flow field stimuli revealed that the most important focus of common activation was found in the dorsolateral parieto-occipital cortex, spanning the scene-selective OPA and the egomotion-selective pIPS/V3A. Individual inspection of the relative locations of these two regions revealed a partial overlap and a similar response profile to an independent low-level visual motion stimulus, suggesting that OPA and pIPS/V3A may be part of a unique motion-selective complex specialized in encoding both egomotion- and scene-relevant information, likely for the control of navigation in a structured environment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00429-020-02112-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7473967/ /pubmed/32647918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02112-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sulpizio, Valentina
Galati, Gaspare
Fattori, Patrizia
Galletti, Claudio
Pitzalis, Sabrina
A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
title A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
title_full A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
title_fullStr A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
title_full_unstemmed A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
title_short A common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
title_sort common neural substrate for processing scenes and egomotion-compatible visual motion
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32647918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00429-020-02112-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sulpiziovalentina acommonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT galatigaspare acommonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT fattoripatrizia acommonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT galletticlaudio acommonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT pitzalissabrina acommonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT sulpiziovalentina commonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT galatigaspare commonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT fattoripatrizia commonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT galletticlaudio commonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion
AT pitzalissabrina commonneuralsubstrateforprocessingscenesandegomotioncompatiblevisualmotion