Cargando…
Quality and reporting of clinical guidelines for breast cancer treatment: A systematic review
BACKGROUND: High-quality, well-reported clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and consensus statements (CSs) underpinned by systematic reviews are needed. We appraised the quality and reporting of CPGs and CSs for breast cancer (BC) treatment. METHODS: Following protocol registration (Prospero n(o): C...
Autores principales: | Maes-Carballo, Marta, Mignini, Luciano, Martín-Díaz, Manuel, Bueno-Cavanillas, Aurora, Khan, Khalid Saeed |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7473996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32858405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.011 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Shared decision making in breast cancer treatment guidelines: Development of a quality assessment tool and a systematic review
por: Maes‐Carballo, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evaluation of the Use of Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer: International Survey
por: Maes-Carballo, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Quality indicators for breast cancer care: A systematic review
por: Maes-Carballo, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators in Spain: A Systematic Review
por: Maes-Carballo, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
A comprehensive systematic review of colorectal cancer screening clinical practices guidelines and consensus statements
por: Maes-Carballo, Marta, et al.
Publicado: (2022)